426 research outputs found
The generalized Robinson-Foulds metric
The Robinson-Foulds (RF) metric is arguably the most widely used measure of
phylogenetic tree similarity, despite its well-known shortcomings: For example,
moving a single taxon in a tree can result in a tree that has maximum distance
to the original one; but the two trees are identical if we remove the single
taxon. To this end, we propose a natural extension of the RF metric that does
not simply count identical clades but instead, also takes similar clades into
consideration. In contrast to previous approaches, our model requires the
matching between clades to respect the structure of the two trees, a property
that the classical RF metric exhibits, too. We show that computing this
generalized RF metric is, unfortunately, NP-hard. We then present a simple
Integer Linear Program for its computation, and evaluate it by an
all-against-all comparison of 100 trees from a benchmark data set. We find that
matchings that respect the tree structure differ significantly from those that
do not, underlining the importance of this natural condition.Comment: Peer-reviewed and presented as part of the 13th Workshop on
Algorithms in Bioinformatics (WABI2013
The generalized Robinson-Foulds distance for phylogenetic trees
The Robinson-Foulds (RF) distance, one of the most widely used metrics for comparing phylogenetic trees, has the advantage of being intuitive, with a natural interpretation in terms of common splits, and it can be computed in linear time, but it has a very low resolution, and it may become trivial for phylogenetic trees with overlapping taxa, that is, phylogenetic trees that share some but not all of their leaf labels. In this article, we study the properties of the Generalized Robinson-Foulds (GRF) distance, a recently proposed metric for comparing any structures that can be described by multisets of multisets of labels, when applied to rooted phylogenetic trees with overlapping taxa, which are described by sets of clusters, that is, by sets of sets of labels. We show that the GRF distance has a very high resolution, it can also be computed in linear time, and it is not (uniformly) equivalent to the RF distance.This research was partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universitiesand the European Regional Development Fund through project PGC2018-096956-B-C43 (FEDER/MICINN/AEI), and by the Agency for Management of University and Research Grants (AGAUR) throughgrant 2017-SGR-786 (ALBCOM).Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
On the accuracy of language trees
Historical linguistics aims at inferring the most likely language
phylogenetic tree starting from information concerning the evolutionary
relatedness of languages. The available information are typically lists of
homologous (lexical, phonological, syntactic) features or characters for many
different languages.
From this perspective the reconstruction of language trees is an example of
inverse problems: starting from present, incomplete and often noisy,
information, one aims at inferring the most likely past evolutionary history. A
fundamental issue in inverse problems is the evaluation of the inference made.
A standard way of dealing with this question is to generate data with
artificial models in order to have full access to the evolutionary process one
is going to infer. This procedure presents an intrinsic limitation: when
dealing with real data sets, one typically does not know which model of
evolution is the most suitable for them. A possible way out is to compare
algorithmic inference with expert classifications. This is the point of view we
take here by conducting a thorough survey of the accuracy of reconstruction
methods as compared with the Ethnologue expert classifications. We focus in
particular on state-of-the-art distance-based methods for phylogeny
reconstruction using worldwide linguistic databases.
In order to assess the accuracy of the inferred trees we introduce and
characterize two generalizations of standard definitions of distances between
trees. Based on these scores we quantify the relative performances of the
distance-based algorithms considered. Further we quantify how the completeness
and the coverage of the available databases affect the accuracy of the
reconstruction. Finally we draw some conclusions about where the accuracy of
the reconstructions in historical linguistics stands and about the leading
directions to improve it.Comment: 36 pages, 14 figure
Inferring Species Trees from Incongruent Multi-Copy Gene Trees Using the Robinson-Foulds Distance
We present a new method for inferring species trees from multi-copy gene
trees. Our method is based on a generalization of the Robinson-Foulds (RF)
distance to multi-labeled trees (mul-trees), i.e., gene trees in which multiple
leaves can have the same label. Unlike most previous phylogenetic methods using
gene trees, this method does not assume that gene tree incongruence is caused
by a single, specific biological process, such as gene duplication and loss,
deep coalescence, or lateral gene transfer. We prove that it is NP-hard to
compute the RF distance between two mul-trees, but it is easy to calculate the
generalized RF distance between a mul-tree and a singly-labeled tree. Motivated
by this observation, we formulate the RF supertree problem for mul-trees
(MulRF), which takes a collection of mul-trees and constructs a species tree
that minimizes the total RF distance from the input mul-trees. We present a
fast heuristic algorithm for the MulRF supertree problem. Simulation
experiments demonstrate that the MulRF method produces more accurate species
trees than gene tree parsimony methods when incongruence is caused by gene tree
error, duplications and losses, and/or lateral gene transfer. Furthermore, the
MulRF heuristic runs quickly on data sets containing hundreds of trees with up
to a hundred taxa.Comment: 16 pages, 11 figure
Polyhedral geometry of Phylogenetic Rogue Taxa
It is well known among phylogeneticists that adding an extra taxon (e.g.
species) to a data set can alter the structure of the optimal phylogenetic tree
in surprising ways. However, little is known about this "rogue taxon" effect.
In this paper we characterize the behavior of balanced minimum evolution (BME)
phylogenetics on data sets of this type using tools from polyhedral geometry.
First we show that for any distance matrix there exist distances to a "rogue
taxon" such that the BME-optimal tree for the data set with the new taxon does
not contain any nontrivial splits (bipartitions) of the optimal tree for the
original data. Second, we prove a theorem which restricts the topology of
BME-optimal trees for data sets of this type, thus showing that a rogue taxon
cannot have an arbitrary effect on the optimal tree. Third, we construct
polyhedral cones computationally which give complete answers for BME rogue
taxon behavior when our original data fits a tree on four, five, and six taxa.
We use these cones to derive sufficient conditions for rogue taxon behavior for
four taxa, and to understand the frequency of the rogue taxon effect via
simulation.Comment: In this version, we add quartet distances and fix Table 4
Evolutionary Inference via the Poisson Indel Process
We address the problem of the joint statistical inference of phylogenetic
trees and multiple sequence alignments from unaligned molecular sequences. This
problem is generally formulated in terms of string-valued evolutionary
processes along the branches of a phylogenetic tree. The classical evolutionary
process, the TKF91 model, is a continuous-time Markov chain model comprised of
insertion, deletion and substitution events. Unfortunately this model gives
rise to an intractable computational problem---the computation of the marginal
likelihood under the TKF91 model is exponential in the number of taxa. In this
work, we present a new stochastic process, the Poisson Indel Process (PIP), in
which the complexity of this computation is reduced to linear. The new model is
closely related to the TKF91 model, differing only in its treatment of
insertions, but the new model has a global characterization as a Poisson
process on the phylogeny. Standard results for Poisson processes allow key
computations to be decoupled, which yields the favorable computational profile
of inference under the PIP model. We present illustrative experiments in which
Bayesian inference under the PIP model is compared to separate inference of
phylogenies and alignments.Comment: 33 pages, 6 figure
Edit distance metrics for measuring dissimilarity between labeled gene trees
Les arbres phylogénétiques sont des instruments de biologie évolutive offrant de formidables moyens d'étude pour la génomique comparative.
Ils fournissent des moyens de représenter des mécanismes permettant de modéliser les relations de parenté entre les espèces ou les membres de familles de gènes en fonction de la diversité taxonomique, ainsi que des observations et des renseignements sur l'histoire évolutive, la structure et la variation des processus biologiques.
Cependant, les méthodes traditionnelles d'inférence phylogénétique ont la réputation d'être sensibles aux erreurs.
Il est donc indispensable de comparer les arbres phylogénétiques et de les analyser pour obtenir la meilleure interprétation des données biologiques qu'ils peuvent fournir.
Nous commençons par aborder les travaux connexes existants pour déduire, comparer et analyser les arbres phylogénétiques, en évaluant leurs bonnes caractéristiques ainsi que leurs défauts, et discuter des pistes d'améliorations futures.
La deuxième partie de cette thèse se concentre sur le développement de mesures efficaces et précises pour analyser et comparer des paires d'arbres génétiques avec des nœuds internes étiquetés. Nous montrons que notre extension de la métrique bien connue de Robinson-Foulds donne lieu à une bonne métrique pour la comparaison d'arbres génétiques étiquetés sous divers modèles évolutifs, et qui peuvent impliquer divers événements évolutifs.Phylogenetic trees are instruments of evolutionary biology offering great insight for comparative genomics.
They provide mechanisms to model the kinship relations between species or members of gene families as a function of taxonomic diversity. They also provide evidence and insights into the evolutionary history, structure, and variation of biological processes.
However, traditional phylogenetic inference methods have the reputation to be prone to errors.
Therefore, comparing and analysing phylogenetic trees is indispensable for obtaining the best interpretation of the biological information they can provide.
We start by assessing existing related work to infer, compare, and analyse phylogenetic trees, evaluating their advantageous traits and flaws, and discussing avenues for future improvements.
The second part of this thesis focuses on the development of efficient and accurate metrics to analyse and compare pairs of gene trees with labeled internal nodes. We show that our attempt in extending the popular Robinson-Foulds metric is useful for the preliminary analysis and comparison of labeled gene trees under various evolutionary models that may involve various evolutionary events
- …