6 research outputs found

    Approximate reasoning with fuzzy-syllogistic systems

    Get PDF
    The well known Aristotelian syllogistic system consists of 256 moods. We have found earlier that 136 moods are distinct in terms of equal truth ratios that range in τ=[0,1]. The truth ratio of a particular mood is calculated by relating the number of true and false syllogistic cases the mood matches. A mood with truth ratio is a fuzzy-syllogistic mood. The introduction of (n-1) fuzzy existential quantifiers extends the system to fuzzy-syllogistic systems nS, 1<n, of which every fuzzy-syllogistic mood can be interpreted as a vague inference with a generic truth ratio that is determined by its syllogistic structure. We experimentally introduce the logic of a fuzzy-syllogistic ontology reasoner that is based on the fuzzy-syllogistic systems nS. We further introduce a new concept, the relative truth ratio rτ=[0,1] that is calculated based on the cardinalities of the syllogistic cases

    Development of fuzzy syllogistic algorithms and applications distributed reasoning approaches

    Get PDF
    Thesis (Master)--Izmir Institute of Technology, Computer Engineering, Izmir, 2010Includes bibliographical references (leaves: 44-45)Text in English; Abstract: Turkish and Englishx, 65 leavesA syllogism, also known as a rule of inference or logical appeals, is a formal logical scheme used to draw a conclusion from a set of premises. It is a form of deductive reasoning that conclusion inferred from the stated premises. The syllogistic system consists of systematically combined premises and conclusions to so called figures and moods. The syllogistic system is a theory for reasoning, developed by Aristotle, who is known as one of the most important contributors of the western thought and logic. Since Aristotle, philosophers and sociologists have successfully modelled human thought and reasoning with syllogistic structures. However, a major lack was that the mathematical properties of the whole syllogistic system could not be fully revealed by now. To be able to calculate any syllogistic property exactly, by using a single algorithm, could indeed facilitate modelling possibly any sort of consistent, inconsistent or approximate human reasoning. In this work generic fuzzifications of sample invalid syllogisms and formal proofs of their validity with set theoretic representations are presented. Furthermore, the study discuss the mapping of sample real-world statements onto those syllogisms and some relevant statistics about the results gained from the algorithm applied onto syllogisms. By using this syllogistic framework, it can be used in various fields that can uses syllogisms as inference mechanisms such as semantic web, object oriented programming and data mining reasoning processes

    A Fuzzy Syllogistic Reasoning Schema for Generalized Quantifiers

    Get PDF
    In this paper, a new approximate syllogistic reasoning schema is described that expands some of the approaches expounded in the literature into two ways: (i) a number of different types of quantifiers (logical, absolute, proportional, comparative and exception) taken from Theory of Generalized Quantifiers and similarity quantifiers, taken from statistics, are considered and (ii) any number of premises can be taken into account within the reasoning process. Furthermore, a systematic reasoning procedure to solve the syllogism is also proposed, interpreting it as an equivalent mathematical optimization problem, where the premises constitute the constraints of the searching space for the quantifier in the conclusion.Comment: 22 pages, 6 figures, journal pape

    The fuzzy syllogistic system

    Get PDF
    9th Mexican International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, MICAI 2010; Pachuca; Mexico; 8 November 2010 through 13 November 2010A categorical syllogism is a rule of inference, consisting of two premisses and one conclusion. Every premiss and conclusion consists of dual relationships between the objects M, P, S. Logicians usually use only true syllogisms for deductive reasoning. After predicate logic had superseded syllogisms in the 19th century, interest on the syllogistic system vanished. We have analysed the syllogistic system, which consists of 256 syllogistic moods in total, algorithmically. We have discovered that the symmetric structure of syllogistic figure formation is inherited to the moods and their truth values, making the syllogistic system an inherently symmetric reasoning mechanism, consisting of 25 true, 100 unlikely, 6 uncertain, 100 likely and 25 false moods. In this contribution, we discuss the most significant statistical properties of the syllogistic system and define on top of that the fuzzy syllogistic system. The fuzzy syllogistic system allows for syllogistic approximate reasoning inductively learned M, P, S relationships.2009-İYTE-BAP-1

    Ontology-Based Fuzzy-Syllogistic Reasoning

    No full text
    28th International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, IEA/AIE 2015; Seoul; South Korea; 10 June 2015 through 12 June 2015We discuss the Fuzzy-Syllogistic System (FSS) that consists of the well-known 256 categorical syllogisms, namely syllogistic moods, and Fuzzy- Syllogistic Reasoning (FSR), which is an implementation of the FSS as one complex approximate reasoning mechanism, in which the 256 moods are interpreted as fuzzy inferences. Here we introduce a sample application of FSR as ontology reasoner. The reasoner can associate up to 256 possible fuzzyinferences with truth ratios in [0,1] for every triple concept relationship of the ontology. We further discuss a transformation technique, by which the truth ratio of a fuzzy-inference can increase, by adapting the fuzzy-quantifiers of a fuzzy-inference to the syllogistic logic of the sample propositions
    corecore