7,087 research outputs found
Computing Safe Contention Bounds for Multicore Resources with Round-Robin and FIFO Arbitration
Numerous researchers have studied the contention that arises among tasks running in parallel on a multicore processor. Most of those studies seek to derive a tight and sound upper-bound for the worst-case delay with which a processor resource may serve an incoming request, when its access is arbitrated using time-predictable policies such as round-robin or FIFO. We call this value upper-bound delay ( ubd ). Deriving trustworthy ubd statically is possible when sufficient public information exists on the timing latency incurred on access to the resource of interest. Unfortunately however, that is rarely granted for commercial-of-the-shelf (COTS) processors. Therefore, the users resort to measurement observations on the target processor and thus compute a “measured” ubdm . However, using ubdm to compute worst-case execution time values for programs running on COTS multicore processors requires qualification on the soundness of the result. In this paper, we present a measurement-based methodology to derive a ubdm under round-robin (RoRo) and first-in-first-out (FIFO) arbitration, which accurately approximates ubd from above, without needing latency information from the hardware provider. Experimental results, obtained on multiple processor configurations, demonstrate the robustness of the proposed methodology.The research leading to this work has received funding from: the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No
644080(SAFURE); the European Space Agency under Contract 789.2013 and NPI Contract 40001102880; and COST Action IC1202, Timing Analysis On Code-Level (TACLe). This work has also been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation under grant TIN2015-65316-P. Jaume Abella has been partially supported by the MINECO under Ramon y Cajal postdoctoral fellowship number RYC-2013-14717. The authors would like to thanks Paul Caheny for his help with the proofreading of this document.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Microgrid - The microthreaded many-core architecture
Traditional processors use the von Neumann execution model, some other
processors in the past have used the dataflow execution model. A combination of
von Neuman model and dataflow model is also tried in the past and the resultant
model is referred as hybrid dataflow execution model. We describe a hybrid
dataflow model known as the microthreading. It provides constructs for
creation, synchronization and communication between threads in an intermediate
language. The microthreading model is an abstract programming and machine model
for many-core architecture. A particular instance of this model is named as the
microthreaded architecture or the Microgrid. This architecture implements all
the concurrency constructs of the microthreading model in the hardware with the
management of these constructs in the hardware.Comment: 30 pages, 16 figure
Improving latency tolerance of multithreading through decoupling
The increasing hardware complexity of dynamically scheduled superscalar processors may compromise the scalability of this organization to make an efficient use of future increases in transistor budget. SMT processors, designed over a superscalar core, are therefore directly concerned by this problem. The article presents and evaluates a novel processor microarchitecture which combines two paradigms: simultaneous multithreading and access/execute decoupling. Since its decoupled units issue instructions in order, this architecture is significantly less complex, in terms of critical path delays, than a centralized out-of-order design, and it is more effective for future growth in issue-width and clock speed. We investigate how both techniques complement each other. Since decoupling features an excellent memory latency hiding efficiency, the large amount of parallelism exploited by multithreading may be used to hide the latency of functional units and keep them fully utilized. The study shows that, by adding decoupling to a multithreaded architecture, fewer threads are needed to achieve maximum throughput. Therefore, in addition to the obvious hardware complexity reduction, it places lower demands on the memory system. The study also reveals that multithreading by itself exhibits little memory latency tolerance. Results suggest that most of the latency hiding effectiveness of SMT architectures comes from the dynamic scheduling. On the other hand, decoupling is very effective at hiding memory latency. An increase in the cache miss penalty from 1 to 32 cycles reduces the performance of a 4-context multithreaded decoupled processor by less than 2 percent. For the nondecoupled multithreaded processor, the loss of performance is about 23 percent.Peer ReviewedPostprint (published version
Boosting Multi-Core Reachability Performance with Shared Hash Tables
This paper focuses on data structures for multi-core reachability, which is a
key component in model checking algorithms and other verification methods. A
cornerstone of an efficient solution is the storage of visited states. In
related work, static partitioning of the state space was combined with
thread-local storage and resulted in reasonable speedups, but left open whether
improvements are possible. In this paper, we present a scaling solution for
shared state storage which is based on a lockless hash table implementation.
The solution is specifically designed for the cache architecture of modern
CPUs. Because model checking algorithms impose loose requirements on the hash
table operations, their design can be streamlined substantially compared to
related work on lockless hash tables. Still, an implementation of the hash
table presented here has dozens of sensitive performance parameters (bucket
size, cache line size, data layout, probing sequence, etc.). We analyzed their
impact and compared the resulting speedups with related tools. Our
implementation outperforms two state-of-the-art multi-core model checkers (SPIN
and DiVinE) by a substantial margin, while placing fewer constraints on the
load balancing and search algorithms.Comment: preliminary repor
On the tailoring of CAST-32A certification guidance to real COTS multicore architectures
The use of Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) multicores in real-time industry is on the rise due to multicores' potential performance increase and energy reduction. Yet, the unpredictable impact on timing of contention in shared hardware resources challenges certification. Furthermore, most safety certification standards target single-core architectures and do not provide explicit guidance for multicore processors. Recently, however, CAST-32A has been presented providing guidance for software planning, development and verification in multicores. In this paper, from a theoretical level, we provide a detailed review of CAST-32A objectives and the difficulty of reaching them under current COTS multicore design trends; at experimental level, we assess the difficulties of the application of CAST-32A to a real multicore processor, the NXP P4080.This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) under grant
TIN2015-65316-P and the HiPEAC Network of Excellence.
Jaume Abella has been partially supported by the MINECO under Ramon y Cajal grant RYC-2013-14717.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Parallelism-Aware Memory Interference Delay Analysis for COTS Multicore Systems
In modern Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) multicore systems, each core can
generate many parallel memory requests at a time. The processing of these
parallel requests in the DRAM controller greatly affects the memory
interference delay experienced by running tasks on the platform. In this paper,
we model a modern COTS multicore system which has a nonblocking last-level
cache (LLC) and a DRAM controller that prioritizes reads over writes. To
minimize interference, we focus on LLC and DRAM bank partitioned systems. Based
on the model, we propose an analysis that computes a safe upper bound for the
worst-case memory interference delay. We validated our analysis on a real COTS
multicore platform with a set of carefully designed synthetic benchmarks as
well as SPEC2006 benchmarks. Evaluation results show that our analysis is more
accurately capture the worst-case memory interference delay and provides safer
upper bounds compared to a recently proposed analysis which significantly
under-estimate the delay.Comment: Technical Repor
- …