Empirical likelihood based testing for regression

Consider a random vector $(X,Y)$ and let $m(x)=E(Y|X=x)$. We are interested in testing $H_0:m\in {\cal M}_{\Theta,{\cal G}}=\{\gamma(\cdot,\theta,g):\theta \in \Theta,g\in {\cal G}\}$ for some known function $\gamma$, some compact set $\Theta \subset$IR$^p$ and some function set ${\cal G}$ of real valued functions. Specific examples of this general hypothesis include testing for a parametric regression model, a generalized linear model, a partial linear model, a single index model, but also the selection of explanatory variables can be considered as a special case of this hypothesis. To test this null hypothesis, we make use of the so-called marked empirical process introduced by \citeD and studied by \citeSt for the particular case of parametric regression, in combination with the modern technique of empirical likelihood theory in order to obtain a powerful testing procedure. The asymptotic validity of the proposed test is established, and its finite sample performance is compared with other existing tests by means of a simulation study.Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/07-EJS152 the Electronic Journal of Statistics (http://www.i-journals.org/ejs/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Optimal testing of equivalence hypotheses

In this paper we consider the construction of optimal tests of equivalence hypotheses. Specifically, assume X_1,..., X_n are i.i.d. with distribution P_{\theta}, with \theta \in R^k. Let g(\theta) be some real-valued parameter of interest. The null hypothesis asserts g(\theta)\notin (a,b) versus the alternative g(\theta)\in (a,b). For example, such hypotheses occur in bioequivalence studies where one may wish to show two drugs, a brand name and a proposed generic version, have the same therapeutic effect. Little optimal theory is available for such testing problems, and it is the purpose of this paper to provide an asymptotic optimality theory. Thus, we provide asymptotic upper bounds for what is achievable, as well as asymptotically uniformly most powerful test constructions that attain the bounds. The asymptotic theory is based on Le Cam's notion of asymptotically normal experiments. In order to approximate a general problem by a limiting normal problem, a UMP equivalence test is obtained for testing the mean of a multivariate normal mean.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/009053605000000048 in the Annals of Statistics (http://www.imstat.org/aos/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org

Locally most powerful sequential tests of a simple hypothesis vs one-sided alternatives

Let $X_1,X_2,...$ be a discrete-time stochastic process with a distribution $P_\theta$, $\theta\in\Theta$, where $\Theta$ is an open subset of the real line. We consider the problem of testing a simple hypothesis $H_0:$ $\theta=\theta_0$ versus a composite alternative $H_1:$ $\theta>\theta_0$, where $\theta_0\in\Theta$ is some fixed point. The main goal of this article is to characterize the structure of locally most powerful sequential tests in this problem. For any sequential test $(\psi,\phi)$ with a (randomized) stopping rule $\psi$ and a (randomized) decision rule $\phi$ let $\alpha(\psi,\phi)$ be the type I error probability, $\dot \beta_0(\psi,\phi)$ the derivative, at $\theta=\theta_0$, of the power function, and $\mathscr N(\psi)$ an average sample number of the test $(\psi,\phi)$. Then we are concerned with the problem of maximizing $\dot \beta_0(\psi,\phi)$ in the class of all sequential tests such that $$\alpha(\psi,\phi)\leq \alpha\quad{and}\quad \mathscr N(\psi)\leq \mathscr N,$$ where $\alpha\in[0,1]$ and $\mathscr N\geq 1$ are some restrictions. It is supposed that $\mathscr N(\psi)$ is calculated under some fixed (not necessarily coinciding with one of $P_\theta$) distribution of the process $X_1,X_2...$. The structure of optimal sequential tests is characterized.Comment: 30 page

Testing uniformity on high-dimensional spheres against monotone rotationally symmetric alternatives

We consider the problem of testing uniformity on high-dimensional unit spheres. We are primarily interested in non-null issues. We show that rotationally symmetric alternatives lead to two Local Asymptotic Normality (LAN) structures. The first one is for fixed modal location $\theta$ and allows to derive locally asymptotically most powerful tests under specified $\theta$. The second one, that addresses the Fisher-von Mises-Langevin (FvML) case, relates to the unspecified-$\theta$ problem and shows that the high-dimensional Rayleigh test is locally asymptotically most powerful invariant. Under mild assumptions, we derive the asymptotic non-null distribution of this test, which allows to extend away from the FvML case the asymptotic powers obtained there from Le Cam's third lemma. Throughout, we allow the dimension $p$ to go to infinity in an arbitrary way as a function of the sample size $n$. Some of our results also strengthen the local optimality properties of the Rayleigh test in low dimensions. We perform a Monte Carlo study to illustrate our asymptotic results. Finally, we treat an application related to testing for sphericity in high dimensions