1,115 research outputs found
Tableau-based decision procedures for logics of strategic ability in multi-agent systems
We develop an incremental tableau-based decision procedures for the
Alternating-time temporal logic ATL and some of its variants.
While running within the theoretically established complexity upper bound, we
claim that our tableau is practically more efficient in the average case than
other decision procedures for ATL known so far. Besides, the ease of its
adaptation to variants of ATL demonstrates the flexibility of the proposed
procedure.Comment: To appear in ACM Transactions on Computational Logic. 48 page
Reducing Validity in Epistemic ATL to Validity in Epistemic CTL
We propose a validity preserving translation from a subset of epistemic
Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) to epistemic Computation Tree Logic
(CTL). The considered subset of epistemic ATL is known to have the finite model
property and decidable model-checking. This entails the decidability of
validity but the implied algorithm is unfeasible. Reducing the validity problem
to that in a corresponding system of CTL makes the techniques for automated
deduction for that logic available for the handling of the apparently more
complex system of ATL.Comment: In Proceedings SR 2013, arXiv:1303.007
Tableau-based decision procedure for the multi-agent epistemic logic with operators of common and distributed knowledge
We develop an incremental-tableau-based decision procedure for the
multi-agent epistemic logic MAEL(CD) (aka S5_n (CD)), whose language contains
operators of individual knowledge for a finite set Ag of agents, as well as
operators of distributed and common knowledge among all agents in Ag. Our
tableau procedure works in (deterministic) exponential time, thus establishing
an upper bound for MAEL(CD)-satisfiability that matches the (implicit)
lower-bound known from earlier results, which implies ExpTime-completeness of
MAEL(CD)-satisfiability. Therefore, our procedure provides a complexity-optimal
algorithm for checking MAEL(CD)-satisfiability, which, however, in most cases
is much more efficient. We prove soundness and completeness of the procedure,
and illustrate it with an example.Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 6th IEEE Conference on Software
Engineering and Formal Methods (SEFM 2008
Complexity and Expressivity of Branching- and Alternating-Time Temporal Logics with Finitely Many Variables
We show that Branching-time temporal logics CTL and CTL*, as well as
Alternating-time temporal logics ATL and ATL*, are as semantically expressive
in the language with a single propositional variable as they are in the full
language, i.e., with an unlimited supply of propositional variables. It follows
that satisfiability for CTL, as well as for ATL, with a single variable is
EXPTIME-complete, while satisfiability for CTL*, as well as for ATL*, with a
single variable is 2EXPTIME-complete,--i.e., for these logics, the
satisfiability for formulas with only one variable is as hard as satisfiability
for arbitrary formulas.Comment: Prefinal version of the published pape
Tableau-based decision procedure for the multi-agent epistemic logic with all coalitional operators for common and distributed knowledge
We develop a conceptually clear, intuitive, and feasible decision procedure
for testing satisfiability in the full multi-agent epistemic logic CMAEL(CD)
with operators for common and distributed knowledge for all coalitions of
agents mentioned in the language. To that end, we introduce Hintikka structures
for CMAEL(CD) and prove that satisfiability in such structures is equivalent to
satisfiability in standard models. Using that result, we design an incremental
tableau-building procedure that eventually constructs a satisfying Hintikka
structure for every satisfiable input set of formulae of CMAEL(CD) and closes
for every unsatisfiable input set of formulae.Comment: Substantially extended and corrected version of arXiv:0902.2125. To
appear in: Logic Journal of the IGPL, special issue on Formal Aspects of
Multi-Agent System
MsATL: a Tool for SAT-Based ATL Satisfiability Checking
We present MsATL: the first tool for deciding the satisfiability of
Alternating-time Temporal Logic (ATL) with imperfect information. MsATL
combines SAT Modulo Monotonic Theories solvers with existing ATL model
checkers: MCMAS and STV. The tool can deal with various semantics of ATL,
including perfect and imperfect information, and can handle additional
practical requirements. MsATL can be applied for synthesis of games that
conform to a given specification, with the synthesised game often being
minimal
Optimal Tableaux Method for Constructive Satisfiability Testing and Model Synthesis in the Alternating-time Temporal Logic ATL+
We develop a sound, complete and practically implementable tableaux-based
decision method for constructive satisfiability testing and model synthesis in
the fragment ATL+ of the full Alternating time temporal logic ATL*. The method
extends in an essential way a previously developed tableaux-based decision
method for ATL and works in 2EXPTIME, which is the optimal worst case
complexity of the satisfiability problem for ATL+ . We also discuss how
suitable parametrizations and syntactic restrictions on the class of input ATL+
formulae can reduce the complexity of the satisfiability problem.Comment: 45 page
A Resolution Prover for Coalition Logic
We present a prototype tool for automated reasoning for Coalition Logic, a non-normal modal logic that can be used for reasoning about cooperative agency. The theorem prover CLProver is based on recent work on a resolution-based calculus for Coalition Logic that operates on coalition problems, a normal form for Coalition Logic. We provide an overview of coalition problems and of the resolution-based calculus for Coalition Logic. We then give details of the implementation of CLProver and present the results for a comparison with an existing tableau-based solver
Optimal Decision Procedures for Satisfiability in Fragments of Alternating-time Temporal Logics
We consider several natural fragments of the alternating-time temporal logics ATL* and ATL with restrictions on the nesting between temporal operators and strategic quantifiers. We develop optimal decision procedures for satisfiability in these fragments, showing that they have much lower complexities than the full languages. In particular, we prove that the satisfiability problem for state formulae in the full `strategically flat' fragment of ATL* is PSPACE-complete, whereas the satisfiability problems in the flat fragments of ATL and ATL are
-complete. We note that the nesting hierarchies for fragments of ATL* collapse in terms of expressiveness above nesting depth 1, hence our results cover all such fragments with lower complexities
- …