51 research outputs found
Inconsistency of Bayesian Inference for Misspecified Linear Models, and a Proposal for Repairing It
We empirically show that Bayesian inference can be inconsistent under
misspecification in simple linear regression problems, both in a model
averaging/selection and in a Bayesian ridge regression setting. We use the
standard linear model, which assumes homoskedasticity, whereas the data are
heteroskedastic, and observe that the posterior puts its mass on ever more
high-dimensional models as the sample size increases. To remedy the problem, we
equip the likelihood in Bayes' theorem with an exponent called the learning
rate, and we propose the Safe Bayesian method to learn the learning rate from
the data. SafeBayes tends to select small learning rates as soon the standard
posterior is not `cumulatively concentrated', and its results on our data are
quite encouraging.Comment: 70 pages, 20 figure
MDL Convergence Speed for Bernoulli Sequences
The Minimum Description Length principle for online sequence
estimation/prediction in a proper learning setup is studied. If the underlying
model class is discrete, then the total expected square loss is a particularly
interesting performance measure: (a) this quantity is finitely bounded,
implying convergence with probability one, and (b) it additionally specifies
the convergence speed. For MDL, in general one can only have loss bounds which
are finite but exponentially larger than those for Bayes mixtures. We show that
this is even the case if the model class contains only Bernoulli distributions.
We derive a new upper bound on the prediction error for countable Bernoulli
classes. This implies a small bound (comparable to the one for Bayes mixtures)
for certain important model classes. We discuss the application to Machine
Learning tasks such as classification and hypothesis testing, and
generalization to countable classes of i.i.d. models.Comment: 28 page
Contextuality of misspecification and data-dependent losses
Analysis and Stochastic
Fast rates in statistical and online learning
The speed with which a learning algorithm converges as it is presented with
more data is a central problem in machine learning --- a fast rate of
convergence means less data is needed for the same level of performance. The
pursuit of fast rates in online and statistical learning has led to the
discovery of many conditions in learning theory under which fast learning is
possible. We show that most of these conditions are special cases of a single,
unifying condition, that comes in two forms: the central condition for 'proper'
learning algorithms that always output a hypothesis in the given model, and
stochastic mixability for online algorithms that may make predictions outside
of the model. We show that under surprisingly weak assumptions both conditions
are, in a certain sense, equivalent. The central condition has a
re-interpretation in terms of convexity of a set of pseudoprobabilities,
linking it to density estimation under misspecification. For bounded losses, we
show how the central condition enables a direct proof of fast rates and we
prove its equivalence to the Bernstein condition, itself a generalization of
the Tsybakov margin condition, both of which have played a central role in
obtaining fast rates in statistical learning. Yet, while the Bernstein
condition is two-sided, the central condition is one-sided, making it more
suitable to deal with unbounded losses. In its stochastic mixability form, our
condition generalizes both a stochastic exp-concavity condition identified by
Juditsky, Rigollet and Tsybakov and Vovk's notion of mixability. Our unifying
conditions thus provide a substantial step towards a characterization of fast
rates in statistical learning, similar to how classical mixability
characterizes constant regret in the sequential prediction with expert advice
setting.Comment: 69 pages, 3 figure
Asymptotics of Discrete MDL for Online Prediction
Minimum Description Length (MDL) is an important principle for induction and
prediction, with strong relations to optimal Bayesian learning. This paper
deals with learning non-i.i.d. processes by means of two-part MDL, where the
underlying model class is countable. We consider the online learning framework,
i.e. observations come in one by one, and the predictor is allowed to update
his state of mind after each time step. We identify two ways of predicting by
MDL for this setup, namely a static} and a dynamic one. (A third variant,
hybrid MDL, will turn out inferior.) We will prove that under the only
assumption that the data is generated by a distribution contained in the model
class, the MDL predictions converge to the true values almost surely. This is
accomplished by proving finite bounds on the quadratic, the Hellinger, and the
Kullback-Leibler loss of the MDL learner, which are however exponentially worse
than for Bayesian prediction. We demonstrate that these bounds are sharp, even
for model classes containing only Bernoulli distributions. We show how these
bounds imply regret bounds for arbitrary loss functions. Our results apply to a
wide range of setups, namely sequence prediction, pattern classification,
regression, and universal induction in the sense of Algorithmic Information
Theory among others.Comment: 34 page
- âŠ