28,733 research outputs found
The Combination of Paradoxical, Uncertain, and Imprecise Sources of Information based on DSmT and Neutro-Fuzzy Inference
The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even
paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and
still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable
modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this chapter, we
present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and paradoxical reasoning,
known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT) in the literature, developed for
dealing with imprecise, uncertain and paradoxical sources of information. We
focus our presentation here rather on the foundations of DSmT, and on the two
important new rules of combination, than on browsing specific applications of
DSmT available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout the
presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach.
The last part of this chapter concerns the presentation of the neutrosophic
logic, the neutro-fuzzy inference and its connection with DSmT. Fuzzy logic and
neutrosophic logic are useful tools in decision making after fusioning the
information using the DSm hybrid rule of combination of masses.Comment: 20 page
An introduction to DSmT
The management and combination of uncertain, imprecise, fuzzy and even
paradoxical or high conflicting sources of information has always been, and
still remains today, of primal importance for the development of reliable
modern information systems involving artificial reasoning. In this
introduction, we present a survey of our recent theory of plausible and
paradoxical reasoning, known as Dezert-Smarandache Theory (DSmT), developed for
dealing with imprecise, uncertain and conflicting sources of information. We
focus our presentation on the foundations of DSmT and on its most important
rules of combination, rather than on browsing specific applications of DSmT
available in literature. Several simple examples are given throughout this
presentation to show the efficiency and the generality of this new approach
A method of classification for multisource data in remote sensing based on interval-valued probabilities
An axiomatic approach to intervalued (IV) probabilities is presented, where the IV probability is defined by a pair of set-theoretic functions which satisfy some pre-specified axioms. On the basis of this approach representation of statistical evidence and combination of multiple bodies of evidence are emphasized. Although IV probabilities provide an innovative means for the representation and combination of evidential information, they make the decision process rather complicated. It entails more intelligent strategies for making decisions. The development of decision rules over IV probabilities is discussed from the viewpoint of statistical pattern recognition. The proposed method, so called evidential reasoning method, is applied to the ground-cover classification of a multisource data set consisting of Multispectral Scanner (MSS) data, Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data, and digital terrain data such as elevation, slope, and aspect. By treating the data sources separately, the method is able to capture both parametric and nonparametric information and to combine them. Then the method is applied to two separate cases of classifying multiband data obtained by a single sensor. In each case a set of multiple sources is obtained by dividing the dimensionally huge data into smaller and more manageable pieces based on the global statistical correlation information. By a divide-and-combine process, the method is able to utilize more features than the conventional maximum likelihood method
Uncertainty Management and Evidential Reasoning with Structured Knowledge
This research addresses two intensive computational problems of reasoning under uncertainty in artificial intelligence. The first problem is to study the strategy for belief propagation over networks. The second problem is to explore properties of operations which construe the behaviour of those factors in the networks. In the study of operations for computing belief combination over a network model, the computational characteristics of operations are modelled by a set of axioms which are in conformity with human inductive and deductive reasoning. According to different topological connection of networks, we investigate four types of operations. These operations successfully present desirable results in the face of dependent, less informative, and conflicting evidences. As the connections in networks are complex, there exists a number of possible ways for belief propagation. An efficient graph decomposition technique has been used which converts the complicated networks into simply connected ones. This strategy integrates the logic and probabilistic aspects inference, and by using the four types of operations for its computation it gains the advantage of better description of results (interval-valued representation) and less information needed. The performance of this proposed techniques can be seen in the example for assessing civil engineering structure damage and results are in tune with intuition of practicing civil engineers
Evidence Propagation and Consensus Formation in Noisy Environments
We study the effectiveness of consensus formation in multi-agent systems
where there is both belief updating based on direct evidence and also belief
combination between agents. In particular, we consider the scenario in which a
population of agents collaborate on the best-of-n problem where the aim is to
reach a consensus about which is the best (alternatively, true) state from
amongst a set of states, each with a different quality value (or level of
evidence). Agents' beliefs are represented within Dempster-Shafer theory by
mass functions and we investigate the macro-level properties of four well-known
belief combination operators for this multi-agent consensus formation problem:
Dempster's rule, Yager's rule, Dubois & Prade's operator and the averaging
operator. The convergence properties of the operators are considered and
simulation experiments are conducted for different evidence rates and noise
levels. Results show that a combination of updating on direct evidence and
belief combination between agents results in better consensus to the best state
than does evidence updating alone. We also find that in this framework the
operators are robust to noise. Broadly, Yager's rule is shown to be the better
operator under various parameter values, i.e. convergence to the best state,
robustness to noise, and scalability.Comment: 13th international conference on Scalable Uncertainty Managemen
Adaptive imputation of missing values for incomplete pattern classification
In classification of incomplete pattern, the missing values can either play a
crucial role in the class determination, or have only little influence (or
eventually none) on the classification results according to the context. We
propose a credal classification method for incomplete pattern with adaptive
imputation of missing values based on belief function theory. At first, we try
to classify the object (incomplete pattern) based only on the available
attribute values. As underlying principle, we assume that the missing
information is not crucial for the classification if a specific class for the
object can be found using only the available information. In this case, the
object is committed to this particular class. However, if the object cannot be
classified without ambiguity, it means that the missing values play a main role
for achieving an accurate classification. In this case, the missing values will
be imputed based on the K-nearest neighbor (K-NN) and self-organizing map (SOM)
techniques, and the edited pattern with the imputation is then classified. The
(original or edited) pattern is respectively classified according to each
training class, and the classification results represented by basic belief
assignments are fused with proper combination rules for making the credal
classification. The object is allowed to belong with different masses of belief
to the specific classes and meta-classes (which are particular disjunctions of
several single classes). The credal classification captures well the
uncertainty and imprecision of classification, and reduces effectively the rate
of misclassifications thanks to the introduction of meta-classes. The
effectiveness of the proposed method with respect to other classical methods is
demonstrated based on several experiments using artificial and real data sets
- …