Structural Operational Semantics for Stochastic Process Calculi

A syntactic framework called SGSOS, for defining well-behaved Markovian stochastic transition systems, is introduced by analogy to the GSOS congruence format for nondeterministic processes. Stochastic bisimilarity is guaranteed a congruence for systems defined by SGSOS rules. Associativity of parallel composition in stochastic process algebras is also studied within the SGSOS framework

Modular Structural Operational Semantics

Modular SOS (MSOS) is a variant of conventional Structural Operational Semantics (SOS). Using MSOS, the transition rules for each construct of a programming language can be given incrementally, once and for all, and do not need reformulation when further constructs are added to the language. MSOS thus provides an exceptionally high degree of modularity in language descriptions, removing a shortcoming of the original SOS framework. After sketching the background and reviewing the main features of SOS, the paper explains the crucial differences between SOS and MSOS, and illustrates how MSOS descriptions are written. It also discusses standard notions of semantic equivalence based on MSOS. An appendix shows how the illustrative MSOS rules given in the paper would be formulated in conventional SOS

Structural operational semantics for stochastic and weighted transition systems

We introduce weighted GSOS, a general syntactic framework to specify well-behaved transition systems where transitions are equipped with weights coming from a commutative monoid. We prove that weighted bisimilarity is a congruence on systems defined by weighted GSOS specifications. We illustrate the flexibility of the framework by instantiating it to handle some special cases, most notably that of stochastic transition systems. Through examples we provide weighted-GSOS definitions for common stochastic operators in the literature

Executable Structural Operational Semantics in Maude

This paper describes in detail how to bridge the gap between theory and practice when implementing in Maude structural operational semantics described in rewriting logic, where transitions become rewrites and inference rules become conditional rewrite rules with rewrites in the conditions, as made possible by the new features in Maude 2.0. We validate this technique using it in several case studies: a functional language Fpl (evaluation and computation semantics, including an abstract machine), imperative languages WhileL (evaluation and computation semantics) and GuardL with nondeterminism (computation semantics), Kahn’s functional language Mini-ML (evaluation or natural semantics), Milner’s CCS (with strong and weak transitions), and Full LOTOS (including ACT ONE data type specifications). In addition, on top of CCS we develop an implementation of the Hennessy-Milner modal logic for describing local capabilities of processes, and for LOTOS we build an entire tool where Full LOTOS specifications can be entered and executed (without user knowledge of the underlying implementation of the semantics). We also compare this method based on transitions as rewrites with another one based on transitions as judgements

Exploiting Labels in Structural Operational Semantics

Structural Operational Semantics (SOS) allows transitions to be labelled. This is fully exploited in SOS descriptions of concurrent systems, but usually not at all in conventional descriptions of sequential programming languages. This paper shows how the use of labels can provide significantly simpler and more modular descriptions of programming languages. However, the full power of labels is obtained only when the set of labels is made into a category, as in the recently-proposed MSOS variant of SOS

Coalgebraic Semantics for Timed Processes

We give a coalgebraic formulation of timed processes and their operational semantics. We model time by a monoid called a “time domain”, and we model processes by “timed transition systems”, which amount to partial monoid actions of the time domain or, equivalently, coalgebras for an “evolution comonad ” generated by the time domain. All our examples of time domains satisfy a partial closure property, yielding a distributive law of a monad for total monoid actions over the evolution comonad, and hence a distributive law of the evolution comonad over a dual comonad for total monoid actions. We show that the induced coalgebras are exactly timed transition systems with delay operators. We then integrate our coalgebraic formulation of time qua timed transition systems into Turi and Plotkin’s formulation of structural operational semantics in terms of distributive laws. We combine timing with action via the more general study of the combination of two arbitrary sorts of behaviour whose operational semantics may interact. We give a modular account of the operational semantics for a combination induced by that of each of its components. Our study necessitates the investigation of products of comonads. In particular, we characterise when a monad lifts to the category of coalgebras for a product comonad, providing constructions with which one can readily calculate. Key words: time domains, timed transition systems, evolution comonads, delay operators, structural operational semantics, modularity, distributive laws

Structural operational semantics through context-dependent behaviour

We present an operational semantics for an imperative language with concurrency and procedures. The approach is novel because we expose the building block operations – variable assignment and condition checking – in the labels on the transitions; these form the context-dependent behaviour of a program. Using this style results in two main advantages over existing formalisms for imperative programming language semantics: firstly, our individual transition rules are less cluttered, and secondly, we are able to more abstractly and intuitively describe the semantics of procedures, including by-value and by-reference parameters. Existing techniques in the literature tend to result in complex and hard-to-read rules for even simple language constructs, or avoid discussion of procedures and parameters entirely. Our semantics for procedures utilises the context-dependent behaviour in the transition label to neatly handle variable name scoping, and defines the semantics of recursion without requiring additional rules. We also demonstrate how the semantics may be extended to handle function calls within expressions, array element and record field updates, and higher-order programming constructs

Well-behaved translations between structural operational semantics

We examine two versions of maps between distributive laws as candidates for wellbehaved translations between structural operational semantics, and validate that by using simple coalgebraic arguments. We give some concrete examples of wellbehaved translations that are maps between distributive laws. The modelling of structural operational semantics uses Turi and Plotkin's categorical models of GSOS. These maps between distributive laws come from the previous work on 2-categories of distributive laws.