2,195 research outputs found
Stronger Methods of Making Quantum Interactive Proofs Perfectly Complete
This paper presents stronger methods of achieving perfect completeness in
quantum interactive proofs. First, it is proved that any problem in QMA has a
two-message quantum interactive proof system of perfect completeness with
constant soundness error, where the verifier has only to send a constant number
of halves of EPR pairs. This in particular implies that the class QMA is
necessarily included by the class QIP_1(2) of problems having two-message
quantum interactive proofs of perfect completeness, which gives the first
nontrivial upper bound for QMA in terms of quantum interactive proofs. It is
also proved that any problem having an -message quantum interactive proof
system necessarily has an -message quantum interactive proof system of
perfect completeness. This improves the previous result due to Kitaev and
Watrous, where the resulting system of perfect completeness requires
messages if not using the parallelization result.Comment: 41 pages; v2: soundness parameters improved, correction of a minor
error in Lemma 23, and removal of the sentences claiming that our techniques
are quantumly nonrelativizin
Generalized Quantum Arthur-Merlin Games
This paper investigates the role of interaction and coins in public-coin
quantum interactive proof systems (also called quantum Arthur-Merlin games).
While prior works focused on classical public coins even in the quantum
setting, the present work introduces a generalized version of quantum
Arthur-Merlin games where the public coins can be quantum as well: the verifier
can send not only random bits, but also halves of EPR pairs. First, it is
proved that the class of two-turn quantum Arthur-Merlin games with quantum
public coins, denoted qq-QAM in this paper, does not change by adding a
constant number of turns of classical interactions prior to the communications
of the qq-QAM proof systems. This can be viewed as a quantum analogue of the
celebrated collapse theorem for AM due to Babai. To prove this collapse
theorem, this paper provides a natural complete problem for qq-QAM: deciding
whether the output of a given quantum circuit is close to a totally mixed
state. This complete problem is on the very line of the previous studies
investigating the hardness of checking the properties related to quantum
circuits, and is of independent interest. It is further proved that the class
qq-QAM_1 of two-turn quantum-public-coin quantum Arthur-Merlin proof systems
with perfect completeness gives new bounds for standard well-studied classes of
two-turn interactive proof systems. Finally, the collapse theorem above is
extended to comprehensively classify the role of interaction and public coins
in quantum Arthur-Merlin games: it is proved that, for any constant m>1, the
class of problems having an m-turn quantum Arthur-Merlin proof system is either
equal to PSPACE or equal to the class of problems having a two-turn quantum
Arthur-Merlin game of a specific type, which provides a complete set of quantum
analogues of Babai's collapse theorem.Comment: 31 pages + cover page, the proof of Lemma 27 (Lemma 24 in v1) is
corrected, and a new completeness result is adde
Quantum Proofs
Quantum information and computation provide a fascinating twist on the notion
of proofs in computational complexity theory. For instance, one may consider a
quantum computational analogue of the complexity class \class{NP}, known as
QMA, in which a quantum state plays the role of a proof (also called a
certificate or witness), and is checked by a polynomial-time quantum
computation. For some problems, the fact that a quantum proof state could be a
superposition over exponentially many classical states appears to offer
computational advantages over classical proof strings. In the interactive proof
system setting, one may consider a verifier and one or more provers that
exchange and process quantum information rather than classical information
during an interaction for a given input string, giving rise to quantum
complexity classes such as QIP, QSZK, and QMIP* that represent natural quantum
analogues of IP, SZK, and MIP. While quantum interactive proof systems inherit
some properties from their classical counterparts, they also possess distinct
and uniquely quantum features that lead to an interesting landscape of
complexity classes based on variants of this model.
In this survey we provide an overview of many of the known results concerning
quantum proofs, computational models based on this concept, and properties of
the complexity classes they define. In particular, we discuss non-interactive
proofs and the complexity class QMA, single-prover quantum interactive proof
systems and the complexity class QIP, statistical zero-knowledge quantum
interactive proof systems and the complexity class \class{QSZK}, and
multiprover interactive proof systems and the complexity classes QMIP, QMIP*,
and MIP*.Comment: Survey published by NOW publisher
Limitations of semidefinite programs for separable states and entangled games
Semidefinite programs (SDPs) are a framework for exact or approximate
optimization that have widespread application in quantum information theory. We
introduce a new method for using reductions to construct integrality gaps for
SDPs. These are based on new limitations on the sum-of-squares (SoS) hierarchy
in approximating two particularly important sets in quantum information theory,
where previously no -round integrality gaps were known: the set of
separable (i.e. unentangled) states, or equivalently, the
norm of a matrix, and the set of quantum correlations; i.e. conditional
probability distributions achievable with local measurements on a shared
entangled state. In both cases no-go theorems were previously known based on
computational assumptions such as the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) which
asserts that 3-SAT requires exponential time to solve. Our unconditional
results achieve the same parameters as all of these previous results (for
separable states) or as some of the previous results (for quantum
correlations). In some cases we can make use of the framework of
Lee-Raghavendra-Steurer (LRS) to establish integrality gaps for any SDP, not
only the SoS hierarchy. Our hardness result on separable states also yields a
dimension lower bound of approximate disentanglers, answering a question of
Watrous and Aaronson et al. These results can be viewed as limitations on the
monogamy principle, the PPT test, the ability of Tsirelson-type bounds to
restrict quantum correlations, as well as the SDP hierarchies of
Doherty-Parrilo-Spedalieri, Navascues-Pironio-Acin and Berta-Fawzi-Scholz.Comment: 47 pages. v2. small changes, fixes and clarifications. published
versio
Why Philosophers Should Care About Computational Complexity
One might think that, once we know something is computable, how efficiently
it can be computed is a practical question with little further philosophical
importance. In this essay, I offer a detailed case that one would be wrong. In
particular, I argue that computational complexity theory---the field that
studies the resources (such as time, space, and randomness) needed to solve
computational problems---leads to new perspectives on the nature of
mathematical knowledge, the strong AI debate, computationalism, the problem of
logical omniscience, Hume's problem of induction, Goodman's grue riddle, the
foundations of quantum mechanics, economic rationality, closed timelike curves,
and several other topics of philosophical interest. I end by discussing aspects
of complexity theory itself that could benefit from philosophical analysis.Comment: 58 pages, to appear in "Computability: G\"odel, Turing, Church, and
beyond," MIT Press, 2012. Some minor clarifications and corrections; new
references adde
Some Applications of Coding Theory in Computational Complexity
Error-correcting codes and related combinatorial constructs play an important
role in several recent (and old) results in computational complexity theory. In
this paper we survey results on locally-testable and locally-decodable
error-correcting codes, and their applications to complexity theory and to
cryptography.
Locally decodable codes are error-correcting codes with sub-linear time
error-correcting algorithms. They are related to private information retrieval
(a type of cryptographic protocol), and they are used in average-case
complexity and to construct ``hard-core predicates'' for one-way permutations.
Locally testable codes are error-correcting codes with sub-linear time
error-detection algorithms, and they are the combinatorial core of
probabilistically checkable proofs
Spatial isolation implies zero knowledge even in a quantum world
Zero knowledge plays a central role in cryptography and complexity. The seminal work of Ben-Or et al. (STOC 1988) shows that zero knowledge can be achieved unconditionally for any language in NEXP, as long as one is willing to make a suitable physical assumption: if the provers are spatially isolated, then they can be assumed to be playing independent strategies. Quantum mechanics, however, tells us that this assumption is unrealistic, because spatially-isolated provers could share a quantum entangled state and realize a non-local correlated strategy. The MIP* model captures this setting. In this work we study the following question: does spatial isolation still suffice to unconditionally achieve zero knowledge even in the presence of quantum entanglement? We answer this question in the affirmative: we prove that every language in NEXP has a 2-prover zero knowledge interactive proof that is sound against entangled provers; that is, NEXP ⊆ ZK-MIP*. Our proof consists of constructing a zero knowledge interactive PCP with a strong algebraic structure, and then lifting it to the MIP* model. This lifting relies on a new framework that builds on recent advances in low-degree testing against entangled strategies, and clearly separates classical and quantum tools. Our main technical contribution is the development of new algebraic techniques for obtaining unconditional zero knowledge; this includes a zero knowledge variant of the celebrated sumcheck protocol, a key building block in many probabilistic proof systems. A core component of our sumcheck protocol is a new algebraic commitment scheme, whose analysis relies on algebraic complexity theory
Bridging the gap between general probabilistic theories and the device-independent framework for nonlocality and contextuality
Characterizing quantum correlations in terms of information-theoretic
principles is a popular chapter of quantum foundations. Traditionally, the
principles adopted for this scope have been expressed in terms of conditional
probability distributions, specifying the probability that a black box produces
a certain output upon receiving a certain input. This framework is known as
"device-independent". Another major chapter of quantum foundations is the
information-theoretic characterization of quantum theory, with its sets of
states and measurements, and with its allowed dynamics. The different
frameworks adopted for this scope are known under the umbrella term "general
probabilistic theories". With only a few exceptions, the two programmes on
characterizing quantum correlations and characterizing quantum theory have so
far proceeded on separate tracks, each one developing its own methods and its
own agenda. This paper aims at bridging the gap, by comparing the two
frameworks and illustrating how the two programmes can benefit each other.Comment: 61 pages, no figures, published versio
- …