7,964 research outputs found
A Boxology of Design Patterns for Hybrid Learning and Reasoning Systems
We propose a set of compositional design patterns to describe a large variety
of systems that combine statistical techniques from machine learning with
symbolic techniques from knowledge representation. As in other areas of
computer science (knowledge engineering, software engineering, ontology
engineering, process mining and others), such design patterns help to
systematize the literature, clarify which combinations of techniques serve
which purposes, and encourage re-use of software components. We have validated
our set of compositional design patterns against a large body of recent
literature.Comment: 12 pages,55 reference
A Complete Theory of Everything (will be subjective)
Increasingly encompassing models have been suggested for our world. Theories
range from generally accepted to increasingly speculative to apparently bogus.
The progression of theories from ego- to geo- to helio-centric models to
universe and multiverse theories and beyond was accompanied by a dramatic
increase in the sizes of the postulated worlds, with humans being expelled from
their center to ever more remote and random locations. Rather than leading to a
true theory of everything, this trend faces a turning point after which the
predictive power of such theories decreases (actually to zero). Incorporating
the location and other capacities of the observer into such theories avoids
this problem and allows to distinguish meaningful from predictively meaningless
theories. This also leads to a truly complete theory of everything consisting
of a (conventional objective) theory of everything plus a (novel subjective)
observer process. The observer localization is neither based on the
controversial anthropic principle, nor has it anything to do with the
quantum-mechanical observation process. The suggested principle is extended to
more practical (partial, approximate, probabilistic, parametric) world models
(rather than theories of everything). Finally, I provide a justification of
Ockham's razor, and criticize the anthropic principle, the doomsday argument,
the no free lunch theorem, and the falsifiability dogma.Comment: 26 LaTeX page
Backwards is the way forward: feedback in the cortical hierarchy predicts the expected future
Clark offers a powerful description of the brain as a prediction machine, which offers progress on two distinct levels. First, on an abstract conceptual level, it provides a unifying framework for perception, action, and cognition (including subdivisions such as attention, expectation, and imagination). Second, hierarchical prediction offers progress on a concrete descriptive level for testing and constraining conceptual elements and mechanisms of predictive coding models (estimation of predictions, prediction errors, and internal models)
Robust Reasoning for Autonomous Cyber-Physical Systems in Dynamic Environments
Autonomous cyber-physical systems, CPS, in dynamic environments must work impeccably. The cyber-physical systems must handle tasks consistently and trustworthily, i.e., with a robust behavior. Robust systems, in general, require making valid and solid decisions using one or a combination of robust reasoning strategies, algorithms, and robustness analysis. However, in dynamic environments, data can be incomplete, skewed, contradictory, and redundant impacting the reasoning. Basing decisions on these data can lead to inconsistent, irrational, and unreasonable cyber-physical systems' movements, adversely impacting the system’s reliability and integrity.
This paper presents the assessment of robust reasoning for autonomous cyber-physical systems in dynamic environments. In this work, robust reasoning is considered as 1) the capability of drawing conclusions with available data by applying classical and non-classical reasoning strategies and algorithms and 2) act and react robustly and safely in dynamic environments by employing robustness analysis to provide options on possible actions and evaluate alternative decisions. The result of the research shows that different common existing strategies, algorithms and analyses can be provided together with a comparison of their applicabilities, benefits, and drawbacks in the context of cyber-physical systems operating in dynamically changing environments. The conclusion is that robust reasoning in cyber-physical systems can handle dynamic environments. Moreover, combining these strategies and algorithms with robustness analysis can support achieving robust behavior in autonomous cyber-physical systems while operating in dynamically changing environments
Exploring the landscapes of "computing": digital, neuromorphic, unconventional -- and beyond
The acceleration race of digital computing technologies seems to be steering
toward impasses -- technological, economical and environmental -- a condition
that has spurred research efforts in alternative, "neuromorphic" (brain-like)
computing technologies. Furthermore, since decades the idea of exploiting
nonlinear physical phenomena "directly" for non-digital computing has been
explored under names like "unconventional computing", "natural computing",
"physical computing", or "in-materio computing". This has been taking place in
niches which are small compared to other sectors of computer science. In this
paper I stake out the grounds of how a general concept of "computing" can be
developed which comprises digital, neuromorphic, unconventional and possible
future "computing" paradigms. The main contribution of this paper is a
wide-scope survey of existing formal conceptualizations of "computing". The
survey inspects approaches rooted in three different kinds of background
mathematics: discrete-symbolic formalisms, probabilistic modeling, and
dynamical-systems oriented views. It turns out that different choices of
background mathematics lead to decisively different understandings of what
"computing" is. Across all of this diversity, a unifying coordinate system for
theorizing about "computing" can be distilled. Within these coordinates I
locate anchor points for a foundational formal theory of a future
computing-engineering discipline that includes, but will reach beyond, digital
and neuromorphic computing.Comment: An extended and carefully revised version of this manuscript has now
(March 2021) been published as "Toward a generalized theory comprising
digital, neuromorphic, and unconventional computing" in the new open-access
journal Neuromorphic Computing and Engineerin
- …