Strategic Rewriting

AbstractThis is a position paper preparing the round table organized during the 4th International Workshop on Reduction Strategies in Rewriting and Programming. I sketch what I believe to be important challenges of strategic rewriting

Strategic programming on graph rewriting systems

We describe a strategy language to control the application of graph rewriting rules, and show how this language can be used to write high-level declarative programs in several application areas. This language is part of a graph-based programming tool built within the port-graph transformation and visualisation environment PORGY.Comment: In Proceedings IWS 2010, arXiv:1012.533

Graph Creation, Visualisation and Transformation

We describe a tool to create, edit, visualise and compute with interaction nets - a form of graph rewriting systems. The editor, called GraphPaper, allows users to create and edit graphs and their transformation rules using an intuitive user interface. The editor uses the functionalities of the TULIP system, which gives us access to a wealth of visualisation algorithms. Interaction nets are not only a formalism for the specification of graphs, but also a rewrite-based computation model. We discuss graph rewriting strategies and a language to express them in order to perform strategic interaction net rewriting

A TYPE ANALYSIS OF REWRITE STRATEGIES

Rewrite strategies provide an algorithmic rewriting of terms using strategic compositions of rewrite rules. Due to the programmability of rewrites, errors are often made due to incorrect compositions of rewrites or incorrect application of rewrites to a term within a strategic rewriting program. In practical applications of strategic rewriting, testing and debugging becomes substantially time-intensive for large programs applied to large inputs derived from large term grammars. In essence, determining which rewrite in what position in a term did or did not re comes down to logging, tracing and/or di -like comparison of inputs to outputs. In this thesis, we explore type-enabled analysis of strategic rewriting programs to detect errors statically. In particular, we introduce high-precision types to closely approximate the dynamic behavior of rewriting. We also use union types to track sets of types due to presence of strategic compositions. In this framework of high-precision strategic typing, we develop and implement an expressive type system for a representative strategic rewriting language TL. The results of this research are sufficiently broad to be adapted to other strategic rewriting languages. In particular, the type-inferencing algorithm does not require explicit type annotations for minimal impact on an existing language. Based on our experience with the implementation, the type system significantly reduces the time and effort to program correct rewrite strategies while performing the analysis on the order of thousands of source lines of code per second

Strategic Port Graph Rewriting: An Interactive Modelling and Analysis Framework

We present strategic portgraph rewriting as a basis for the implementation of visual modelling and analysis tools. The goal is to facilitate the specification, analysis and simulation of complex systems, using port graphs. A system is represented by an initial graph and a collection of graph rewriting rules, together with a user-defined strategy to control the application of rules. The strategy language includes constructs to deal with graph traversal and management of rewriting positions in the graph. We give a small-step operational semantics for the language, and describe its implementation in the graph transformation and visualisation tool PORGY.Comment: In Proceedings GRAPHITE 2014, arXiv:1407.767

Shoggoth: A Formal Foundation for Strategic Rewriting

Rewriting is a versatile and powerful technique used in many domains. Strategic rewriting allows programmers to control the application of rewrite rules by composing individual rewrite rules into complex rewrite strategies. These strategies are semantically complex, as they may be nondeterministic, they may raise errors that trigger backtracking, and they may not terminate.Given such semantic complexity, it is necessary to establish a formal understanding of rewrite strategies and to enable reasoning about them in order to answer questions like: How do we know that a rewrite strategy terminates? How do we know that a rewrite strategy does not fail because we compose two incompatible rewrites? How do we know that a desired property holds after applying a rewrite strategy?In this paper, we introduce Shoggoth: a formal foundation for understanding, analysing and reasoning about strategic rewriting that is capable of answering these questions. We provide a denotational semantics of System S, a core language for strategic rewriting, and prove its equivalence to our big-step operational semantics, which extends existing work by explicitly accounting for divergence. We further define a location-based weakest precondition calculus to enable formal reasoning about rewriting strategies, and we prove this calculus sound with respect to the denotational semantics. We show how this calculus can be used in practice to reason about properties of rewriting strategies, including termination, that they are well-composed, and that desired postconditions hold. The semantics and calculus are formalised in Isabelle/HOL and all proofs are mechanised

Rewriting Strategies and Strategic Rewrite Programs (Updated version)

This survey aims at providing unified definitions of strategies , strategic rewriting and strategic programs. It gives examples of main constructs and languages used to write strategies. It also explores some properties of strategic rewriting and operational semantics of strategic programs. Current research topics are identified

Rewriting Strategies and Strategic Rewrite Programs

International audienceThis survey aims at providing unified definitions of strategies, strategic rewriting and strategic programs. It gives examples of main constructs and languages used to write strategies. It also explores some properties of strategic rewriting and operational semantics of strategic programs. Current research topics are identified