Statman\u27s 1-Section Theorem

Statman\u27s 1-Section Theorem [17] is an important but little-known result in the model theory of the simply-typed λ-calculus. The λ-Section Theorem states a necessary and sufficient condition on models of the simply-typed λ-calculus for determining whether βη-equational reasoning is complete for proving equations that hold in a model. We review the statement of the theorem, give a detailed proof, and discuss its significance

Categorical Completeness Results for the Simply-typed Lambda-calculus

. We investigate, in a categorical setting, some completeness properties of beta-eta conversion between closed terms of the simplytyped lambda calculus. A cartesian-closed category is said to be complete if, for any two unconvertible terms, there is some interpretation of the calculus in the category that distinguishes them. It is said to have a complete interpretation if there is some interpretation that equates only interconvertible terms. We give simple necessary and sufficient conditions on the category for each of the two forms of completeness to hold. The classic completeness results of, e.g., Friedman and Plotkin are immediate consequences. As another application, we derive a syntactic theorem of Statman characterizing beta-eta conversion as a maximum consistent congruence relation satisfying a property known as typical ambiguity. 1 Introduction In 1970 Friedman proved that beta-eta conversion is complete for deriving all equalities between the (simply-typed) lambda-definable..

The most nonelementary theory (a direct lower bound proof)

We give a direct proof by generic reduction that a decidable rudimentary theory of finite typed sets [Henkin 63, Meyer 74, Statman 79, Mairson 92] requires space exceeding infinitely often an exponentially growing stack of twos. This gives the highest currently known lower bound for a decidable logical theory and affirmatively answers to Problem 10.13 of [Compton & Henson 90]: Is there a `natural' decidable theory with a lower bound of the form $\exp_\infty(f(n))$, where $f$ is not linearly bounded? The highest previously known lower and upper bounds for `natural' decidable theories, like WS1S, S2S, are `just' linearly growing stacks of twos

Statman's Hierarchy Theorem

Contains fulltext : 180780.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access