2,558 research outputs found
Gaussian process convolutions for Bayesian spatial classification
Master's Project (M.S.) University of Alaska Fairbanks, 2016We compare three models for their ability to perform binary spatial classification. A geospatial data set consisting of observations that are either permafrost or not is used for this comparison. All three use an underlying Gaussian process. The first model considers this process to represent the log-odds of a positive classification (i.e. as permafrost). The second model uses a cutoff. Any locations where the process is positive are classified positively, while those that are negative are classified negatively. A probability of misclassification then gives the likelihood. The third model depends on two separate processes. The first represents a positive classification, while the second a negative classification. Of these two, the process with greater value at a location provides the classification. A probability of misclassification is also used to formulate the likelihood for this model. In all three cases, realizations of the underlying Gaussian processes were generated using a process convolution. A grid of knots (whose values were sampled using Markov Chain Monte Carlo) were convolved using an anisotropic Gaussian kernel. All three models provided adequate classifications, but the single and two-process models showed much tighter bounds on the border between the two states
Temporal and Spatial Classification of Active IPv6 Addresses
There is striking volume of World-Wide Web activity on IPv6 today. In early
2015, one large Content Distribution Network handles 50 billion IPv6 requests
per day from hundreds of millions of IPv6 client addresses; billions of unique
client addresses are observed per month. Address counts, however, obscure the
number of hosts with IPv6 connectivity to the global Internet. There are
numerous address assignment and subnetting options in use; privacy addresses
and dynamic subnet pools significantly inflate the number of active IPv6
addresses. As the IPv6 address space is vast, it is infeasible to
comprehensively probe every possible unicast IPv6 address. Thus, to survey the
characteristics of IPv6 addressing, we perform a year-long passive measurement
study, analyzing the IPv6 addresses gleaned from activity logs for all clients
accessing a global CDN.
The goal of our work is to develop flexible classification and measurement
methods for IPv6, motivated by the fact that its addresses are not merely more
numerous; they are different in kind. We introduce the notion of classifying
addresses and prefixes in two ways: (1) temporally, according to their
instances of activity to discern which addresses can be considered stable; (2)
spatially, according to the density or sparsity of aggregates in which active
addresses reside. We present measurement and classification results numerically
and visually that: provide details on IPv6 address use and structure in global
operation across the past year; establish the efficacy of our classification
methods; and demonstrate that such classification can clarify dimensions of the
Internet that otherwise appear quite blurred by current IPv6 addressing
practices
Linear vs Nonlinear Extreme Learning Machine for Spectral-Spatial Classification of Hyperspectral Image
As a new machine learning approach, extreme learning machine (ELM) has
received wide attentions due to its good performances. However, when directly
applied to the hyperspectral image (HSI) classification, the recognition rate
is too low. This is because ELM does not use the spatial information which is
very important for HSI classification. In view of this, this paper proposes a
new framework for spectral-spatial classification of HSI by combining ELM with
loopy belief propagation (LBP). The original ELM is linear, and the nonlinear
ELMs (or Kernel ELMs) are the improvement of linear ELM (LELM). However, based
on lots of experiments and analysis, we found out that the LELM is a better
choice than nonlinear ELM for spectral-spatial classification of HSI.
Furthermore, we exploit the marginal probability distribution that uses the
whole information in the HSI and learn such distribution using the LBP. The
proposed method not only maintain the fast speed of ELM, but also greatly
improves the accuracy of classification. The experimental results in the
well-known HSI data sets, Indian Pines and Pavia University, demonstrate the
good performances of the proposed method.Comment: 13 pages,8 figures,3 tables,articl
Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images: three tricks and a new supervised learning setting
Spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images has been the subject
of many studies in recent years. In the presence of only very few labeled
pixels, this task becomes challenging. In this paper we address the following
two research questions: 1) Can a simple neural network with just a single
hidden layer achieve state of the art performance in the presence of few
labeled pixels? 2) How is the performance of hyperspectral image classification
methods affected when using disjoint train and test sets? We give a positive
answer to the first question by using three tricks within a very basic shallow
Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) architecture: a tailored loss function, and
smooth- and label-based data augmentation. The tailored loss function enforces
that neighborhood wavelengths have similar contributions to the features
generated during training. A new label-based technique here proposed favors
selection of pixels in smaller classes, which is beneficial in the presence of
very few labeled pixels and skewed class distributions. To address the second
question, we introduce a new sampling procedure to generate disjoint train and
test set. Then the train set is used to obtain the CNN model, which is then
applied to pixels in the test set to estimate their labels. We assess the
efficacy of the simple neural network method on five publicly available
hyperspectral images. On these images our method significantly outperforms
considered baselines. Notably, with just 1% of labeled pixels per class, on
these datasets our method achieves an accuracy that goes from 86.42%
(challenging dataset) to 99.52% (easy dataset). Furthermore we show that the
simple neural network method improves over other baselines in the new
challenging supervised setting. Our analysis substantiates the highly
beneficial effect of using the entire image (so train and test data) for
constructing a model.Comment: Remote Sensing 201
Multiple Spectral-Spatial Classification Approach for Hyperspectral Data
A .new multiple classifier approach for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images is proposed. Several classifiers are used independently to classify an image. For every pixel, if all the classifiers have assigned this pixel to the same class, the pixel is kept as a marker, i.e., a seed of the spatial region, with the corresponding class label. We propose to use spectral-spatial classifiers at the preliminary step of the marker selection procedure, each of them combining the results of a pixel-wise classification and a segmentation map. Different segmentation methods based on dissimilar principles lead to different classification results. Furthermore, a minimum spanning forest is built, where each tree is rooted on a classification -driven marker and forms a region in the spectral -spatial classification: map. Experimental results are presented for two hyperspectral airborne images. The proposed method significantly improves classification accuracies, when compared to previously proposed classification techniques
- …