Does collaborative research published in top journals remain uncited?

This paper investigates whether collaborative research published in top journals remains uncited, and to what extent access type (open and closed) affects on citation of collaborative research published in top journals. It looks at publications including articles, conference papers, reviews, short surveys, editorials, letters, notes published between 2009-2016 with an affiliation from Chalmers University of Technology and indexed in Scopus. To giveenough time to gather citation, two-year time frame is considered for the publication of the year 2016. The data is classified based on access types: closed and open access, and sub-classified as cited closed access, cited open access, non-cited closed access, and non-cited open access in SciVal. The top 25 percentile indicating the number of journals that are in the top 25% of the most cited journals indexed by Scopus is considered. The result showsthat a small portion of collaborative research published in top journals remain uncited irrespective of types of collaboration. In case of international collaborative research, publications in closed access are more cited than in open access. Institutional collaborative research publications are more cited than national collaborative ones. Collaborative research is more cited than single authors’ publications and single authored conference paperspublished in the top percentile do not remain uncited

Signals in Science - On the Importance of Signaling in Gaining Attention in Science

Which signals are important in gaining attention in science? For a group of 1,371 scientific articles published in 17 demography journals in the years 1990-1992 we track their influence and discern which signals are important in receiving citations. Three types of signals are examined: the author’s reputation (as producer of the idea), the journal (as the broker of the idea), and the state of uncitedness (as an indication of the assessment by the scientific community of an idea). The empirical analysis points out that, first, the reputation of journals plays an overriding role in gaining attention in science. Second, in contrast to common wisdom, the state of uncitedness does not affect the future probability of being cited. And third, the reputation of a journal may help to get late recognition (so-called ‘sleeping beauties’) as well as generate so-called ‘flash-in-the-pans’: immediately noted articles but apparently not very influential in the long run

Children's Literature, Text and Theory: What Are We Interested in Now?

See articl

Identification of Emerging Scientific Topics in Bibliometric Databases

Bibliometrie, Maschinelles Lernen, LDA, Clustering, Neue Themen Abstract = Frühzeitiges Erkennen von aufkommenden Themengebieten in der Wissenschaft unterstützt sowohl Entscheidungen auf individueller als auch öffentlicher Ebene. Viele bestehende Verfahren beschränken sich auf eine retrospektive (Zitations-)Analyse der Publikationsdaten. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war deshalb die Entwicklung eines Verfahrens, das zeitnah und neutral sogenannte "emerging topic candidates" aus einem Set von wissenschaftlichen Publikationen auswählt

Identification of Emerging Scientific Topics in Bibliometric Databases

Bibliometrie, Maschinelles Lernen, LDA, Clustering, Neue Themen Abstract = Frühzeitiges Erkennen von aufkommenden Themengebieten in der Wissenschaft unterstützt sowohl Entscheidungen auf individueller als auch öffentlicher Ebene. Viele bestehende Verfahren beschränken sich auf eine retrospektive (Zitations-)Analyse der Publikationsdaten. Das Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war deshalb die Entwicklung eines Verfahrens, das zeitnah und neutral sogenannte "emerging topic candidates" aus einem Set von wissenschaftlichen Publikationen auswählt

Bulloch Herald

https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/bulloch-news-issues/4693/thumbnail.jp