Conservative extensions of the λ-calculus for the computational interpretation of sequent calculus

This thesis offers a study of the Curry-Howard correspondence for a certain fragment (the canonical fragment) of sequent calculus based on an investigation of the relationship between cut elimination in that fragment and normalisation. The output of this study may be summarised in a new assignment θ, to proofs in the canonical fragment, of terms from certain conservative extensions of the λ-calculus. This assignment, in a sense, is an optimal improvement over the traditional assignment φ, in that it is an isomorphism both in the sense of sound bijection of proofs and isomorphism of normalisation procedures.First, a systematic definition of calculi of cut-elimination for the canonical fragment is carried out. We study various right protocols, i.e. cut-elimination procedures which give priority to right permutation. We pay particular attention to the issue of what parts of the procedure are to be implicit, that is, performed by meta-operators in the style of natural deduction. Next, a comprehensive study of the relationship between normalisation and these calculi of cut-elimination is done, producing several new insight of independent interest, particularly concerning a generalisation of Prawitz’s mapping of normal natural deduction proofs into sequent calculus.This study suggests the definition of conservative extensions of natural deduc­tion (and λ-calculus) based on the idea of a built-in distinction between applica­tive term and application, and also between head and tail application. These extensions offer perfect counterparts to the calculi in the canonical fragment, as established by the mentioned mapping θ . Conceptual rearrangements in proof- theory deriving from these extensions of natural deduction are discussed.Finally, we argue that, computationally, both the canonical fragment and natural deduction (in the extended sense introduced here) correspond to extensions of the λ-calculus with applicative terms; and that what distinguishes them is the way applicative terms are structured. In the canonical fragment, the head application of an applicative term is “focused” . This, in turn, explains the following observation: some reduction rules of calculi in the canonical fragment may be interpreted as transition rules for abstract call-by-name machines

Cut-Simulation and Impredicativity

We investigate cut-elimination and cut-simulation in impredicative (higher-order) logics. We illustrate that adding simple axioms such as Leibniz equations to a calculus for an impredicative logic -- in our case a sequent calculus for classical type theory -- is like adding cut. The phenomenon equally applies to prominent axioms like Boolean- and functional extensionality, induction, choice, and description. This calls for the development of calculi where these principles are built-in instead of being treated axiomatically.Comment: 21 page

Dual-Context Calculi for Modal Logic

We present natural deduction systems and associated modal lambda calculi for the necessity fragments of the normal modal logics K, T, K4, GL and S4. These systems are in the dual-context style: they feature two distinct zones of assumptions, one of which can be thought as modal, and the other as intuitionistic. We show that these calculi have their roots in in sequent calculi. We then investigate their metatheory, equip them with a confluent and strongly normalizing notion of reduction, and show that they coincide with the usual Hilbert systems up to provability. Finally, we investigate a categorical semantics which interprets the modality as a product-preserving functor.Comment: Full version of article previously presented at LICS 2017 (see arXiv:1602.04860v4 or doi: 10.1109/LICS.2017.8005089

Inducing syntactic cut-elimination for indexed nested sequents

The key to the proof-theoretic study of a logic is a proof calculus with a subformula property. Many different proof formalisms have been introduced (e.g. sequent, nested sequent, labelled sequent formalisms) in order to provide such calculi for the many logics of interest. The nested sequent formalism was recently generalised to indexed nested sequents in order to yield proof calculi with the subformula property for extensions of the modal logic K by (Lemmon-Scott) Geach axioms. The proofs of completeness and cut-elimination therein were semantic and intricate. Here we show that derivations in the labelled sequent formalism whose sequents are `almost treelike' correspond exactly to indexed nested sequents. This correspondence is exploited to induce syntactic proofs for indexed nested sequent calculi making use of the elegant proofs that exist for the labelled sequent calculi. A larger goal of this work is to demonstrate how specialising existing proof-theoretic transformations alleviate the need for independent proofs in each formalism. Such coercion can also be used to induce new cutfree calculi. We employ this to present the first indexed nested sequent calculi for intermediate logics.Comment: This is an extended version of the conference paper [20

Grafting Hypersequents onto Nested Sequents

We introduce a new Gentzen-style framework of grafted hypersequents that combines the formalism of nested sequents with that of hypersequents. To illustrate the potential of the framework, we present novel calculi for the modal logics $\mathsf{K5}$ and $\mathsf{KD5}$, as well as for extensions of the modal logics $\mathsf{K}$ and $\mathsf{KD}$ with the axiom for shift reflexivity. The latter of these extensions is also known as $\mathsf{SDL}^+$ in the context of deontic logic. All our calculi enjoy syntactic cut elimination and can be used in backwards proof search procedures of optimal complexity. The tableaufication of the calculi for $\mathsf{K5}$ and $\mathsf{KD5}$ yields simplified prefixed tableau calculi for these logic reminiscent of the simplified tableau system for $\mathsf{S5}$, which might be of independent interest

Simple Decision Procedure for S5 in Standard Cut-Free Sequent Calculus

In the paper a decision procedure for S5 is presented which uses a cut-free sequent calculus with additional rules allowing a reduction to normal modal forms. It utilizes the fact that in S5 every formula is equivalent to some 1-degree formula, i.e. a modally-flat formula with modal functors having only boolean formulas in its scope. In contrast to many sequent calculi (SC) for S5 the presented system does not introduce any extra devices. Thus it is a standard version of SC but with some additional simple rewrite rules. The procedure combines the proces of saturation of sequents with reduction of their elements to some normal modal form

Proof Theory of Finite-valued Logics

The proof theory of many-valued systems has not been investigated to an extent comparable to the work done on axiomatizatbility of many-valued logics. Proof theory requires appropriate formalisms, such as sequent calculus, natural deduction, and tableaux for classical (and intuitionistic) logic. One particular method for systematically obtaining calculi for all finite-valued logics was invented independently by several researchers, with slight variations in design and presentation. The main aim of this report is to develop the proof theory of finite-valued first order logics in a general way, and to present some of the more important results in this area. In Systems covered are the resolution calculus, sequent calculus, tableaux, and natural deduction. This report is actually a template, from which all results can be specialized to particular logics