14,746 research outputs found

    Self-Stabilizing Computation of 3-Edge-Connected Components

    Get PDF

    HSkip+: A Self-Stabilizing Overlay Network for Nodes with Heterogeneous Bandwidths

    Full text link
    In this paper we present and analyze HSkip+, a self-stabilizing overlay network for nodes with arbitrary heterogeneous bandwidths. HSkip+ has the same topology as the Skip+ graph proposed by Jacob et al. [PODC 2009] but its self-stabilization mechanism significantly outperforms the self-stabilization mechanism proposed for Skip+. Also, the nodes are now ordered according to their bandwidths and not according to their identifiers. Various other solutions have already been proposed for overlay networks with heterogeneous bandwidths, but they are not self-stabilizing. In addition to HSkip+ being self-stabilizing, its performance is on par with the best previous bounds on the time and work for joining or leaving a network of peers of logarithmic diameter and degree and arbitrary bandwidths. Also, the dilation and congestion for routing messages is on par with the best previous bounds for such networks, so that HSkip+ combines the advantages of both worlds. Our theoretical investigations are backed by simulations demonstrating that HSkip+ is indeed performing much better than Skip+ and working correctly under high churn rates.Comment: This is a long version of a paper published by IEEE in the Proceedings of the 14-th IEEE International Conference on Peer-to-Peer Computin

    Silent MST approximation for tiny memory

    Get PDF
    In network distributed computing, minimum spanning tree (MST) is one of the key problems, and silent self-stabilization one of the most demanding fault-tolerance properties. For this problem and this model, a polynomial-time algorithm with O(logā”2ā€‰ā£n)O(\log^2\!n) memory is known for the state model. This is memory optimal for weights in the classic [1,poly(n)][1,\text{poly}(n)] range (where nn is the size of the network). In this paper, we go below this O(logā”2ā€‰ā£n)O(\log^2\!n) memory, using approximation and parametrized complexity. More specifically, our contributions are two-fold. We introduce a second parameter~ss, which is the space needed to encode a weight, and we design a silent polynomial-time self-stabilizing algorithm, with space O(logā”nā‹…s)O(\log n \cdot s). In turn, this allows us to get an approximation algorithm for the problem, with a trade-off between the approximation ratio of the solution and the space used. For polynomial weights, this trade-off goes smoothly from memory O(logā”n)O(\log n) for an nn-approximation, to memory O(logā”2ā€‰ā£n)O(\log^2\!n) for exact solutions, with for example memory O(logā”nlogā”logā”n)O(\log n\log\log n) for a 2-approximation

    Fast Consensus under Eventually Stabilizing Message Adversaries

    Full text link
    This paper is devoted to deterministic consensus in synchronous dynamic networks with unidirectional links, which are under the control of an omniscient message adversary. Motivated by unpredictable node/system initialization times and long-lasting periods of massive transient faults, we consider message adversaries that guarantee periods of less erratic message loss only eventually: We present a tight bound of 2D+12D+1 for the termination time of consensus under a message adversary that eventually guarantees a single vertex-stable root component with dynamic network diameter DD, as well as a simple algorithm that matches this bound. It effectively halves the termination time 4D+14D+1 achieved by an existing consensus algorithm, which also works under our message adversary. We also introduce a generalized, considerably stronger variant of our message adversary, and show that our new algorithm, unlike the existing one, still works correctly under it.Comment: 13 pages, 5 figures, updated reference

    Fast and compact self-stabilizing verification, computation, and fault detection of an MST

    Get PDF
    This paper demonstrates the usefulness of distributed local verification of proofs, as a tool for the design of self-stabilizing algorithms.In particular, it introduces a somewhat generalized notion of distributed local proofs, and utilizes it for improving the time complexity significantly, while maintaining space optimality. As a result, we show that optimizing the memory size carries at most a small cost in terms of time, in the context of Minimum Spanning Tree (MST). That is, we present algorithms that are both time and space efficient for both constructing an MST and for verifying it.This involves several parts that may be considered contributions in themselves.First, we generalize the notion of local proofs, trading off the time complexity for memory efficiency. This adds a dimension to the study of distributed local proofs, which has been gaining attention recently. Specifically, we design a (self-stabilizing) proof labeling scheme which is memory optimal (i.e., O(logā”n)O(\log n) bits per node), and whose time complexity is O(logā”2n)O(\log ^2 n) in synchronous networks, or O(Ī”logā”3n)O(\Delta \log ^3 n) time in asynchronous ones, where Ī”\Delta is the maximum degree of nodes. This answers an open problem posed by Awerbuch and Varghese (FOCS 1991). We also show that Ī©(logā”n)\Omega(\log n) time is necessary, even in synchronous networks. Another property is that if ff faults occurred, then, within the requireddetection time above, they are detected by some node in the O(flogā”n)O(f\log n) locality of each of the faults.Second, we show how to enhance a known transformer that makes input/output algorithms self-stabilizing. It now takes as input an efficient construction algorithm and an efficient self-stabilizing proof labeling scheme, and produces an efficient self-stabilizing algorithm. When used for MST, the transformer produces a memory optimal self-stabilizing algorithm, whose time complexity, namely, O(n)O(n), is significantly better even than that of previous algorithms. (The time complexity of previous MST algorithms that used Ī©(logā”2n)\Omega(\log^2 n) memory bits per node was O(n2)O(n^2), and the time for optimal space algorithms was O(nāˆ£Eāˆ£)O(n|E|).) Inherited from our proof labelling scheme, our self-stabilising MST construction algorithm also has the following two properties: (1) if faults occur after the construction ended, then they are detected by some nodes within O(logā”2n)O(\log ^2 n) time in synchronous networks, or within O(Ī”logā”3n)O(\Delta \log ^3 n) time in asynchronous ones, and (2) if ff faults occurred, then, within the required detection time above, they are detected within the O(flogā”n)O(f\log n) locality of each of the faults. We also show how to improve the above two properties, at the expense of some increase in the memory
    • ā€¦
    corecore