313,930 research outputs found
Quantitative Information Flow as Safety and Liveness Hyperproperties
We employ Clarkson and Schneider's "hyperproperties" to classify various
verification problems of quantitative information flow. The results of this
paper unify and extend the previous results on the hardness of checking and
inferring quantitative information flow. In particular, we identify a subclass
of liveness hyperproperties, which we call "k-observable hyperproperties", that
can be checked relative to a reachability oracle via self composition.Comment: In Proceedings QAPL 2012, arXiv:1207.055
Securing Real-Time Internet-of-Things
Modern embedded and cyber-physical systems are ubiquitous. A large number of
critical cyber-physical systems have real-time requirements (e.g., avionics,
automobiles, power grids, manufacturing systems, industrial control systems,
etc.). Recent developments and new functionality requires real-time embedded
devices to be connected to the Internet. This gives rise to the real-time
Internet-of-things (RT-IoT) that promises a better user experience through
stronger connectivity and efficient use of next-generation embedded devices.
However RT- IoT are also increasingly becoming targets for cyber-attacks which
is exacerbated by this increased connectivity. This paper gives an introduction
to RT-IoT systems, an outlook of current approaches and possible research
challenges towards secure RT- IoT frameworks
Combining behavioural types with security analysis
Today's software systems are highly distributed and interconnected, and they
increasingly rely on communication to achieve their goals; due to their
societal importance, security and trustworthiness are crucial aspects for the
correctness of these systems. Behavioural types, which extend data types by
describing also the structured behaviour of programs, are a widely studied
approach to the enforcement of correctness properties in communicating systems.
This paper offers a unified overview of proposals based on behavioural types
which are aimed at the analysis of security properties
In my Wish List, an Automated Tool for Fail-Secure Design Analysis: an Alloy-Based Feasibility Draft
A system is said to be fail-secure, sometimes confused with fail-safe, if it
maintains its security requirements even in the event of some faults.
Fail-secure analyses are required by some validation schemes, such as some
Common Criteria or NATO certifications. However, it is an aspect of security
which as been overlooked by the community. This paper attempts to shed some
light on the fail-secure field of study by: giving a definition of fail-secure
as used in those certification schemes, and emphasizing the differences with
fail-safe; and exhibiting a first feasibility draft of a fail-secure design
analysis tool based on the Alloy model checker.Comment: In Proceedings ESSS 2014, arXiv:1405.055
Self-composition by Symbolic Execution
This work is licensed under a CC-BY Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/)urn: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-42770urn: urn:nbn:de:0030-drops-42770Self-composition is a logical formulation of non-interference, a high-level security property that guarantees the absence of illicit information leakages through executing programs. In order to capture program executions, self-composition has been expressed in Hoare or modal logic, and has been proved (or refuted) by using theorem provers. These approaches require considerable user interaction, and verification expertise. This paper presents an automated technique to prove self-composition. We reformulate the idea of self-composition into comparing pairs of symbolic paths of the same program; the symbolic paths are given by Symbolic Execution. The result of our analysis is a logical formula expressing self-composition in first-order theories, which can be solved by off-the-shelf Satisfiability Modulo Theories solver
Combined automotive safety and security pattern engineering approach
Automotive systems will exhibit increased levels of automation as well as ever tighter integration with other vehicles, traffic infrastructure, and cloud services. From safety perspective, this can be perceived as boon or bane - it greatly increases complexity and uncertainty, but at the same time opens up new opportunities for realizing innovative safety functions. Moreover, cybersecurity becomes important as additional concern because attacks are now much more likely and severe. However, there is a lack of experience with security concerns in context of safety engineering in general and in automotive safety departments in particular. To address this problem, we propose a systematic pattern-based approach that interlinks safety and security patterns and provides guidance with respect to selection and combination of both types of patterns in context of system engineering. A combined safety and security pattern engineering workflow is proposed to provide systematic guidance to support non-expert engineers based on best practices. The application of the approach is shown and demonstrated by an automotive case study and different use case scenarios.EC/H2020/692474/EU/Architecture-driven, Multi-concern and Seamless Assurance and Certification of Cyber-Physical Systems/AMASSEC/H2020/737422/EU/Secure COnnected Trustable Things/SCOTTEC/H2020/732242/EU/Dependability Engineering Innovation for CPS - DEIS/DEISBMBF, 01IS16043, Collaborative Embedded Systems (CrESt
- âŠ