19,049 research outputs found
Certainty Closure: Reliable Constraint Reasoning with Incomplete or Erroneous Data
Constraint Programming (CP) has proved an effective paradigm to model and
solve difficult combinatorial satisfaction and optimisation problems from
disparate domains. Many such problems arising from the commercial world are
permeated by data uncertainty. Existing CP approaches that accommodate
uncertainty are less suited to uncertainty arising due to incomplete and
erroneous data, because they do not build reliable models and solutions
guaranteed to address the user's genuine problem as she perceives it. Other
fields such as reliable computation offer combinations of models and associated
methods to handle these types of uncertain data, but lack an expressive
framework characterising the resolution methodology independently of the model.
We present a unifying framework that extends the CP formalism in both model
and solutions, to tackle ill-defined combinatorial problems with incomplete or
erroneous data. The certainty closure framework brings together modelling and
solving methodologies from different fields into the CP paradigm to provide
reliable and efficient approches for uncertain constraint problems. We
demonstrate the applicability of the framework on a case study in network
diagnosis. We define resolution forms that give generic templates, and their
associated operational semantics, to derive practical solution methods for
reliable solutions.Comment: Revised versio
Efficient Solving of Quantified Inequality Constraints over the Real Numbers
Let a quantified inequality constraint over the reals be a formula in the
first-order predicate language over the structure of the real numbers, where
the allowed predicate symbols are and . Solving such constraints is
an undecidable problem when allowing function symbols such or . In
the paper we give an algorithm that terminates with a solution for all, except
for very special, pathological inputs. We ensure the practical efficiency of
this algorithm by employing constraint programming techniques
Branch-and-Prune Search Strategies for Numerical Constraint Solving
When solving numerical constraints such as nonlinear equations and
inequalities, solvers often exploit pruning techniques, which remove redundant
value combinations from the domains of variables, at pruning steps. To find the
complete solution set, most of these solvers alternate the pruning steps with
branching steps, which split each problem into subproblems. This forms the
so-called branch-and-prune framework, well known among the approaches for
solving numerical constraints. The basic branch-and-prune search strategy that
uses domain bisections in place of the branching steps is called the bisection
search. In general, the bisection search works well in case (i) the solutions
are isolated, but it can be improved further in case (ii) there are continuums
of solutions (this often occurs when inequalities are involved). In this paper,
we propose a new branch-and-prune search strategy along with several variants,
which not only allow yielding better branching decisions in the latter case,
but also work as well as the bisection search does in the former case. These
new search algorithms enable us to employ various pruning techniques in the
construction of inner and outer approximations of the solution set. Our
experiments show that these algorithms speed up the solving process often by
one order of magnitude or more when solving problems with continuums of
solutions, while keeping the same performance as the bisection search when the
solutions are isolated.Comment: 43 pages, 11 figure
Recommended from our members
Transformation of propositional calculus statements into integer and mixed integer programs: An approach towards automatic reformulation
A systematic procedure for transforming a set of logical statements or logical conditions imposed on a model into an Integer Linear Progamming (ILP) formulation Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) formulation is presented. An ILP stated as a system of linear constraints involving integer variables and an objective function, provides a powerful representation of decision problems through a tightly interrelated closed system of choices. It supports direct representation of logical (Boolean or prepositional calculus) expressions. Binary variables (hereafter called logical variables) are first introduced and methods of logically connecting these to other variables are then presented. Simple constraints can be combined to construct logical relationships and the methods of formulating these are discussed. A reformulation procedure which uses the extended reverse polish representation of a compound logical form is then described. These reformulation procedures are illustrated by two examples. A scheme of implementation.ithin an LP modelling system is outlined
A Computational Comparison of Optimization Methods for the Golomb Ruler Problem
The Golomb ruler problem is defined as follows: Given a positive integer n,
locate n marks on a ruler such that the distance between any two distinct pair
of marks are different from each other and the total length of the ruler is
minimized. The Golomb ruler problem has applications in information theory,
astronomy and communications, and it can be seen as a challenge for
combinatorial optimization algorithms. Although constructing high quality
rulers is well-studied, proving optimality is a far more challenging task. In
this paper, we provide a computational comparison of different optimization
paradigms, each using a different model (linear integer, constraint programming
and quadratic integer) to certify that a given Golomb ruler is optimal. We
propose several enhancements to improve the computational performance of each
method by exploring bound tightening, valid inequalities, cutting planes and
branching strategies. We conclude that a certain quadratic integer programming
model solved through a Benders decomposition and strengthened by two types of
valid inequalities performs the best in terms of solution time for small-sized
Golomb ruler problem instances. On the other hand, a constraint programming
model improved by range reduction and a particular branching strategy could
have more potential to solve larger size instances due to its promising
parallelization features
Stability and Performance Verification of Optimization-based Controllers
This paper presents a method to verify closed-loop properties of
optimization-based controllers for deterministic and stochastic constrained
polynomial discrete-time dynamical systems. The closed-loop properties amenable
to the proposed technique include global and local stability, performance with
respect to a given cost function (both in a deterministic and stochastic
setting) and the gain. The method applies to a wide range of
practical control problems: For instance, a dynamical controller (e.g., a PID)
plus input saturation, model predictive control with state estimation, inexact
model and soft constraints, or a general optimization-based controller where
the underlying problem is solved with a fixed number of iterations of a
first-order method are all amenable to the proposed approach.
The approach is based on the observation that the control input generated by
an optimization-based controller satisfies the associated Karush-Kuhn-Tucker
(KKT) conditions which, provided all data is polynomial, are a system of
polynomial equalities and inequalities. The closed-loop properties can then be
analyzed using sum-of-squares (SOS) programming
- âŠ