16,391 research outputs found
Answering SPARQL queries modulo RDF Schema with paths
SPARQL is the standard query language for RDF graphs. In its strict
instantiation, it only offers querying according to the RDF semantics and would
thus ignore the semantics of data expressed with respect to (RDF) schemas or
(OWL) ontologies. Several extensions to SPARQL have been proposed to query RDF
data modulo RDFS, i.e., interpreting the query with RDFS semantics and/or
considering external ontologies. We introduce a general framework which allows
for expressing query answering modulo a particular semantics in an homogeneous
way. In this paper, we discuss extensions of SPARQL that use regular
expressions to navigate RDF graphs and may be used to answer queries
considering RDFS semantics. We also consider their embedding as extensions of
SPARQL. These SPARQL extensions are interpreted within the proposed framework
and their drawbacks are presented. In particular, we show that the PSPARQL
query language, a strict extension of SPARQL offering transitive closure,
allows for answering SPARQL queries modulo RDFS graphs with the same complexity
as SPARQL through a simple transformation of the queries. We also consider
languages which, in addition to paths, provide constraints. In particular, we
present and compare nSPARQL and our proposal CPSPARQL. We show that CPSPARQL is
expressive enough to answer full SPARQL queries modulo RDFS. Finally, we
compare the expressiveness and complexity of both nSPARQL and the corresponding
fragment of CPSPARQL, that we call cpSPARQL. We show that both languages have
the same complexity through cpSPARQL, being a proper extension of SPARQL graph
patterns, is more expressive than nSPARQL.Comment: RR-8394; alkhateeb2003
Using SPARQL – the practitioners’ viewpoint
A number of studies have analyzed SPARQL log data to draw conclusions about how SPARQL is being used. To complement this work, a survey of SPARQL users has been undertaken. Whilst confirming some of the conclusions of the previous studies, the current work is able to provide additional insight into how users create SPARQL queries, the difficulties they encounter, and the features they would like to see included in the language. Based on this insight, a number of recommendations are presented to the community. These relate to predicting and avoiding computationally expensive queries; extensions to the language; and extending the search paradigm
Provenance for SPARQL queries
Determining trust of data available in the Semantic Web is fundamental for
applications and users, in particular for linked open data obtained from SPARQL
endpoints. There exist several proposals in the literature to annotate SPARQL
query results with values from abstract models, adapting the seminal works on
provenance for annotated relational databases. We provide an approach capable
of providing provenance information for a large and significant fragment of
SPARQL 1.1, including for the first time the major non-monotonic constructs
under multiset semantics. The approach is based on the translation of SPARQL
into relational queries over annotated relations with values of the most
general m-semiring, and in this way also refuting a claim in the literature
that the OPTIONAL construct of SPARQL cannot be captured appropriately with the
known abstract models.Comment: 22 pages, extended version of the ISWC 2012 paper including proof
Dynamic Provenance for SPARQL Update
While the Semantic Web currently can exhibit provenance information by using
the W3C PROV standards, there is a "missing link" in connecting PROV to storing
and querying for dynamic changes to RDF graphs using SPARQL. Solving this
problem would be required for such clear use-cases as the creation of version
control systems for RDF. While some provenance models and annotation techniques
for storing and querying provenance data originally developed with databases or
workflows in mind transfer readily to RDF and SPARQL, these techniques do not
readily adapt to describing changes in dynamic RDF datasets over time. In this
paper we explore how to adapt the dynamic copy-paste provenance model of
Buneman et al. [2] to RDF datasets that change over time in response to SPARQL
updates, how to represent the resulting provenance records themselves as RDF in
a manner compatible with W3C PROV, and how the provenance information can be
defined by reinterpreting SPARQL updates. The primary contribution of this
paper is a semantic framework that enables the semantics of SPARQL Update to be
used as the basis for a 'cut-and-paste' provenance model in a principled
manner.Comment: Pre-publication version of ISWC 2014 pape
Bioqueries: a collaborative environment to create, explore and share SPARQL queries in Life Sciences
Bioqueries provides a collaborative environment to create, explore, execute, clone and share SPARQL queries (including Federated Queries). Federated SPARQL queries can retrieve information from more than one data source.Universidad de Málaga. Campus de Excelencia Internacional Andalucía Tech
How Many and What Types of SPARQL Queries can be Answered through Zero-Knowledge Link Traversal?
The current de-facto way to query the Web of Data is through the SPARQL
protocol, where a client sends queries to a server through a SPARQL endpoint.
Contrary to an HTTP server, providing and maintaining a robust and reliable
endpoint requires a significant effort that not all publishers are willing or
able to make. An alternative query evaluation method is through link traversal,
where a query is answered by dereferencing online web resources (URIs) at real
time. While several approaches for such a lookup-based query evaluation method
have been proposed, there exists no analysis of the types (patterns) of queries
that can be directly answered on the live Web, without accessing local or
remote endpoints and without a-priori knowledge of available data sources. In
this paper, we first provide a method for checking if a SPARQL query (to be
evaluated on a SPARQL endpoint) can be answered through zero-knowledge link
traversal (without accessing the endpoint), and analyse a large corpus of real
SPARQL query logs for finding the frequency and distribution of answerable and
non-answerable query patterns. Subsequently, we provide an algorithm for
transforming answerable queries to SPARQL-LD queries that bypass the endpoints.
We report experimental results about the efficiency of the transformed queries
and discuss the benefits and the limitations of this query evaluation method.Comment: Preprint of paper accepted for publication in the 34th ACM/SIGAPP
Symposium On Applied Computing (SAC 2019
- …