2,739 research outputs found
SMT for Polynomial Constraints on Real Numbers
AbstractThis paper preliminarily reports an SMT for solving polynomial inequalities over real numbers. Our approach is a combination of interval arithmetic (over-approximation, aiming to decide unsatisfiability) and testing (under-approximation, aiming to decide satisfiability) to sandwich precise results. In addition to existing interval arithmetic, such as classical intervals and affine intervals, we newly design Chebyshev Approximation Intervals, focusing on multiplications of the same variables, like Taylor expansions. When testing cannot find a satisfiable instance, this framework is designed to start a refinement loop by splitting input ranges into smaller ones (although this refinement loop implementation is left to future work). Preliminary experiments on small benchmarks from SMT-LIB are also shown
Delta-Complete Decision Procedures for Satisfiability over the Reals
We introduce the notion of "\delta-complete decision procedures" for solving
SMT problems over the real numbers, with the aim of handling a wide range of
nonlinear functions including transcendental functions and solutions of
Lipschitz-continuous ODEs. Given an SMT problem \varphi and a positive rational
number \delta, a \delta-complete decision procedure determines either that
\varphi is unsatisfiable, or that the "\delta-weakening" of \varphi is
satisfiable. Here, the \delta-weakening of \varphi is a variant of \varphi that
allows \delta-bounded numerical perturbations on \varphi. We prove the
existence of \delta-complete decision procedures for bounded SMT over reals
with functions mentioned above. For functions in Type 2 complexity class C,
under mild assumptions, the bounded \delta-SMT problem is in NP^C.
\delta-Complete decision procedures can exploit scalable numerical methods for
handling nonlinearity, and we propose to use this notion as an ideal
requirement for numerically-driven decision procedures. As a concrete example,
we formally analyze the DPLL framework, which integrates Interval
Constraint Propagation (ICP) in DPLL(T), and establish necessary and sufficient
conditions for its \delta-completeness. We discuss practical applications of
\delta-complete decision procedures for correctness-critical applications
including formal verification and theorem proving.Comment: A shorter version appears in IJCAR 201
Satisfiability Modulo Transcendental Functions via Incremental Linearization
In this paper we present an abstraction-refinement approach to Satisfiability
Modulo the theory of transcendental functions, such as exponentiation and
trigonometric functions. The transcendental functions are represented as
uninterpreted in the abstract space, which is described in terms of the
combined theory of linear arithmetic on the rationals with uninterpreted
functions, and are incrementally axiomatized by means of upper- and
lower-bounding piecewise-linear functions. Suitable numerical techniques are
used to ensure that the abstractions of the transcendental functions are sound
even in presence of irrationals. Our experimental evaluation on benchmarks from
verification and mathematics demonstrates the potential of our approach,
showing that it compares favorably with delta-satisfiability /interval
propagation and methods based on theorem proving
Generating and Searching Families of FFT Algorithms
A fundamental question of longstanding theoretical interest is to prove the
lowest exact count of real additions and multiplications required to compute a
power-of-two discrete Fourier transform (DFT). For 35 years the split-radix
algorithm held the record by requiring just 4n log n - 6n + 8 arithmetic
operations on real numbers for a size-n DFT, and was widely believed to be the
best possible. Recent work by Van Buskirk et al. demonstrated improvements to
the split-radix operation count by using multiplier coefficients or "twiddle
factors" that are not n-th roots of unity for a size-n DFT. This paper presents
a Boolean Satisfiability-based proof of the lowest operation count for certain
classes of DFT algorithms. First, we present a novel way to choose new yet
valid twiddle factors for the nodes in flowgraphs generated by common
power-of-two fast Fourier transform algorithms, FFTs. With this new technique,
we can generate a large family of FFTs realizable by a fixed flowgraph. This
solution space of FFTs is cast as a Boolean Satisfiability problem, and a
modern Satisfiability Modulo Theory solver is applied to search for FFTs
requiring the fewest arithmetic operations. Surprisingly, we find that there
are FFTs requiring fewer operations than the split-radix even when all twiddle
factors are n-th roots of unity.Comment: Preprint submitted on March 28, 2011, to the Journal on
Satisfiability, Boolean Modeling and Computatio
Certified Roundoff Error Bounds Using Semidefinite Programming.
Roundoff errors cannot be avoided when implementing numerical programs with finite precision. The ability to reason about rounding is especially important if one wants to explore a range of potential representations, for instance for FPGAs or custom hardware implementation. This problem becomes challenging when the program does not employ solely linear operations as non-linearities are inherent to many interesting computational problems in real-world applications. Existing solutions to reasoning are limited in the presence of nonlinear correlations between variables, leading to either imprecise bounds or high analysis time. Furthermore, while it is easy to implement a straightforward method such as interval arithmetic, sophisticated techniques are less straightforward to implement in a formal setting. Thus there is a need for methods which output certificates that can be formally validated inside a proof assistant. We present a framework to provide upper bounds on absolute roundoff errors. This framework is based on optimization techniques employing semidefinite programming and sums of squares certificates, which can be formally checked inside the Coq theorem prover. Our tool covers a wide range of nonlinear programs, including polynomials and transcendental operations as well as conditional statements. We illustrate the efficiency and precision of this tool on non-trivial programs coming from biology, optimization and space control. Our tool produces more precise error bounds for 37 percent of all programs and yields better performance in 73 percent of all programs
Counterexample-Guided Polynomial Loop Invariant Generation by Lagrange Interpolation
We apply multivariate Lagrange interpolation to synthesize polynomial
quantitative loop invariants for probabilistic programs. We reduce the
computation of an quantitative loop invariant to solving constraints over
program variables and unknown coefficients. Lagrange interpolation allows us to
find constraints with less unknown coefficients. Counterexample-guided
refinement furthermore generates linear constraints that pinpoint the desired
quantitative invariants. We evaluate our technique by several case studies with
polynomial quantitative loop invariants in the experiments
A Survey of Satisfiability Modulo Theory
Satisfiability modulo theory (SMT) consists in testing the satisfiability of
first-order formulas over linear integer or real arithmetic, or other theories.
In this survey, we explain the combination of propositional satisfiability and
decision procedures for conjunctions known as DPLL(T), and the alternative
"natural domain" approaches. We also cover quantifiers, Craig interpolants,
polynomial arithmetic, and how SMT solvers are used in automated software
analysis.Comment: Computer Algebra in Scientific Computing, Sep 2016, Bucharest,
Romania. 201
Invariant Generation through Strategy Iteration in Succinctly Represented Control Flow Graphs
We consider the problem of computing numerical invariants of programs, for
instance bounds on the values of numerical program variables. More
specifically, we study the problem of performing static analysis by abstract
interpretation using template linear constraint domains. Such invariants can be
obtained by Kleene iterations that are, in order to guarantee termination,
accelerated by widening operators. In many cases, however, applying this form
of extrapolation leads to invariants that are weaker than the strongest
inductive invariant that can be expressed within the abstract domain in use.
Another well-known source of imprecision of traditional abstract interpretation
techniques stems from their use of join operators at merge nodes in the control
flow graph. The mentioned weaknesses may prevent these methods from proving
safety properties. The technique we develop in this article addresses both of
these issues: contrary to Kleene iterations accelerated by widening operators,
it is guaranteed to yield the strongest inductive invariant that can be
expressed within the template linear constraint domain in use. It also eschews
join operators by distinguishing all paths of loop-free code segments. Formally
speaking, our technique computes the least fixpoint within a given template
linear constraint domain of a transition relation that is succinctly expressed
as an existentially quantified linear real arithmetic formula. In contrast to
previously published techniques that rely on quantifier elimination, our
algorithm is proved to have optimal complexity: we prove that the decision
problem associated with our fixpoint problem is in the second level of the
polynomial-time hierarchy.Comment: 35 pages, conference version published at ESOP 2011, this version is
a CoRR version of our submission to Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
Adapting Real Quantifier Elimination Methods for Conflict Set Computation
The satisfiability problem in real closed fields is decidable. In the context
of satisfiability modulo theories, the problem restricted to conjunctive sets
of literals, that is, sets of polynomial constraints, is of particular
importance. One of the central problems is the computation of good explanations
of the unsatisfiability of such sets, i.e.\ obtaining a small subset of the
input constraints whose conjunction is already unsatisfiable. We adapt two
commonly used real quantifier elimination methods, cylindrical algebraic
decomposition and virtual substitution, to provide such conflict sets and
demonstrate the performance of our method in practice
Extending ACL2 with SMT Solvers
We present our extension of ACL2 with Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT)
solvers using ACL2's trusted clause processor mechanism. We are particularly
interested in the verification of physical systems including Analog and
Mixed-Signal (AMS) designs. ACL2 offers strong induction abilities for
reasoning about sequences and SMT complements deduction methods like ACL2 with
fast nonlinear arithmetic solving procedures. While SAT solvers have been
integrated into ACL2 in previous work, SMT methods raise new issues because of
their support for a broader range of domains including real numbers and
uninterpreted functions. This paper presents Smtlink, our clause processor for
integrating SMT solvers into ACL2. We describe key design and implementation
issues and describe our experience with its use.Comment: In Proceedings ACL2 2015, arXiv:1509.0552
- …