Towards More Scalable and Robust Machine Learning

For many data-intensive real-world applications, such as recognizing objects from images, detecting spam emails, and recommending items on retail websites, the most successful current approaches involve learning rich prediction rules from large datasets. There are many challenges in these machine learning tasks. For example, as the size of the datasets and the complexity of these prediction rules increase, there is a significant challenge in designing scalable methods that can effectively exploit the availability of distributed computing units. As another example, in many machine learning applications, there can be data corruptions, communication errors, and even adversarial attacks during training and test. Therefore, to build reliable machine learning models, we also have to tackle the challenge of robustness in machine learning.In this dissertation, we study several topics on the scalability and robustness in large-scale learning, with a focus of establishing solid theoretical foundations for these problems, and demonstrate recent progress towards the ambitious goal of building more scalable and robust machine learning models. We start with the speedup saturation problem in distributed stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms with large mini-batches. We introduce the notion of gradient diversity, a metric of the dissimilarity between concurrent gradient updates, and show its key role in the convergence and generalization performance of mini-batch SGD. We then move forward to Byzantine distributed learning, a topic that involves both scalability and robustness in distributed learning. In the Byzantine setting that we consider, a fraction of distributed worker machines can have arbitrary or even adversarial behavior. We design statistically and computationally efficient algorithms to defend against Byzantine failures in distributed optimization with convex and non-convex objectives. Lastly, we discuss the adversarial example phenomenon. We provide theoretical analysis of the adversarially robust generalization properties of machine learning models through the lens of Radamacher complexity

Clustering-based Source-aware Assessment of True Robustness for Learning Models

We introduce a novel validation framework to measure the true robustness of learning models for real-world applications by creating source-inclusive and source-exclusive partitions in a dataset via clustering. We develop a robustness metric derived from source-aware lower and upper bounds of model accuracy even when data source labels are not readily available. We clearly demonstrate that even on a well-explored dataset like MNIST, challenging training scenarios can be constructed under the proposed assessment framework for two separate yet equally important applications: i) more rigorous learning model comparison and ii) dataset adequacy evaluation. In addition, our findings not only promise a more complete identification of trade-offs between model complexity, accuracy and robustness but can also help researchers optimize their efforts in data collection by identifying the less robust and more challenging class labels.Comment: Submitted to UAI 201

Generalization Error in Deep Learning

Deep learning models have lately shown great performance in various fields such as computer vision, speech recognition, speech translation, and natural language processing. However, alongside their state-of-the-art performance, it is still generally unclear what is the source of their generalization ability. Thus, an important question is what makes deep neural networks able to generalize well from the training set to new data. In this article, we provide an overview of the existing theory and bounds for the characterization of the generalization error of deep neural networks, combining both classical and more recent theoretical and empirical results