MaxSAT Resolution and Subcube Sums

We study the MaxRes rule in the context of certifying unsatisfiability. We show that it can be exponentially more powerful than tree-like resolution, and when augmented with weakening (the system MaxResW), p-simulates tree-like resolution. In devising a lower bound technique specific to MaxRes (and not merely inheriting lower bounds from Res), we define a new proof system called the SubCubeSums proof system. This system, which p-simulates MaxResW, can be viewed as a special case of the semialgebraic Sherali-Adams proof system. In expressivity, it is the integral restriction of conical juntas studied in the contexts of communication complexity and extension complexity. We show that it is not simulated by Res. Using a proof technique qualitatively different from the lower bounds that MaxResW inherits from Res, we show that Tseitin contradictions on expander graphs are hard to refute in SubCubeSums. We also establish a lower bound technique via lifting: for formulas requiring large degree in SubCubeSums, their XOR-ification requires large size in SubCubeSums

On Tackling the Limits of Resolution in SAT Solving

The practical success of Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) solvers stems from the CDCL (Conflict-Driven Clause Learning) approach to SAT solving. However, from a propositional proof complexity perspective, CDCL is no more powerful than the resolution proof system, for which many hard examples exist. This paper proposes a new problem transformation, which enables reducing the decision problem for formulas in conjunctive normal form (CNF) to the problem of solving maximum satisfiability over Horn formulas. Given the new transformation, the paper proves a polynomial bound on the number of MaxSAT resolution steps for pigeonhole formulas. This result is in clear contrast with earlier results on the length of proofs of MaxSAT resolution for pigeonhole formulas. The paper also establishes the same polynomial bound in the case of modern core-guided MaxSAT solvers. Experimental results, obtained on CNF formulas known to be hard for CDCL SAT solvers, show that these can be efficiently solved with modern MaxSAT solvers

Reducing SAT to Max2SAT

In the literature we find reductions from 3SAT to Max2SAT. These reductions are based on the usage of a gadget, i.e., a combinatorial structure that allows translating constraints of one problem to constraints of another. Unfortunately, the generation of these gadgets lacks an intuitive or efficient method. In this paper, we provide an efficient and constructive method for Reducing SAT to Max2SAT and show empirical results of how MaxSAT solvers are more efficient than SAT solvers solving the translation of hard formulas for Resolution.Supported by projects PROOFS (PID2019-109137GB-C21) and EU-H2020-RIP LOGISTAR (No. 769142)

Unifying Reasoning and Core-Guided Search for Maximum Satisfiability

A central algorithmic paradigm in maximum satisfiability solving geared towards real-world optimization problems is the core-guided approach. Furthermore, recent progress on preprocessing techniques is bringing in additional reasoning techniques to MaxSAT solving. Towards realizing their combined potential, understanding formal underpinnings of interleavings of preprocessing-style reasoning and core-guided algorithms is important. It turns out that earlier proposed notions for establishing correctness of core-guided algorithms and preprocessing, respectively, are not enough for capturing correctness of interleavings of the techniques. We provide an in-depth analysis of these and related MaxSAT instance transformations, and propose correction set reducibility as a notion that captures inprocessing MaxSAT solving within a state-transition style abstract MaxSAT solving framework. Furthermore, we establish a general theorem of correctness for applications of SAT-based preprocessing techniques in MaxSAT. The results pave way for generic techniques for arguing about the formal correctness of MaxSAT algorithms.Peer reviewe

On solving the MAX-SAT using sum of squares

We consider semidefinite programming (SDP) approaches for solving the maximum satisfiability problem (MAX-SAT) and the weighted partial MAX-SAT. It is widely known that SDP is well-suited to approximate the (MAX-)2-SAT. Our work shows the potential of SDP also for other satisfiability problems, by being competitive with some of the best solvers in the yearly MAX-SAT competition. Our solver combines sum of squares (SOS) based SDP bounds and an efficient parser within a branch & bound scheme. On the theoretical side, we propose a family of semidefinite feasibility problems, and show that a member of this family provides the rank two guarantee. We also provide a parametric family of semidefinite relaxations for the MAX-SAT, and derive several properties of monomial bases used in the SOS approach. We connect two well-known SDP approaches for the (MAX)-SAT, in an elegant way. Moreover, we relate our SOS-SDP relaxations for the partial MAX-SAT to the known SAT relaxations.Comment: 26 pages, 5 figures, 8 tables, 2 appendix page