36,425 research outputs found

    Assessing knee OA severity with CNN attention-based end-to-end architectures

    Get PDF
    This work proposes a novel end-to-end convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture to automatically quantify the severity of knee osteoarthritis (OA) using X-Ray images, which incorporates trainable attention modules acting as unsupervised fine-grained detectors of the region of interest (ROI). The proposed attention modules can be applied at different levels and scales across any CNN pipeline helping the network to learn relevant attention patterns over the most informative parts of the image at different resolutions. We test the proposed attention mechanism on existing state-of-the-art CNN architectures as our base models, achieving promising results on the benchmark knee OA datasets from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI) and multicenter osteoarthritis study (MOST).Postprint (published version

    Doctor Imitator: Hand-Radiography-based Bone Age Assessment by Imitating Scoring Methods

    Full text link
    Bone age assessment is challenging in clinical practice due to the complicated bone age assessment process. Current automatic bone age assessment methods were designed with rare consideration of the diagnostic logistics and thus may yield certain uninterpretable hidden states and outputs. Consequently, doctors can find it hard to cooperate with such models harmoniously because it is difficult to check the correctness of the model predictions. In this work, we propose a new graph-based deep learning framework for bone age assessment with hand radiographs, called Doctor Imitator (DI). The architecture of DI is designed to learn the diagnostic logistics of doctors using the scoring methods (e.g., the Tanner-Whitehouse method) for bone age assessment. Specifically, the convolutions of DI capture the local features of the anatomical regions of interest (ROIs) on hand radiographs and predict the ROI scores by our proposed Anatomy-based Group Convolution, summing up for bone age prediction. Besides, we develop a novel Dual Graph-based Attention module to compute patient-specific attention for ROI features and context attention for ROI scores. As far as we know, DI is the first automatic bone age assessment framework following the scoring methods without fully supervised hand radiographs. Experiments on hand radiographs with only bone age supervision verify that DI can achieve excellent performance with sparse parameters and provide more interpretability.Comment: Original Title: "Doctor Imitator: A Graph-based Bone Age Assessment Framework Using Hand Radiographs" @inproceedings{chen2020doctor, title={Doctor imitator: A graph-based bone age assessment framework using hand radiographs}, author={Chen, Jintai and Yu, Bohan and Lei, Biwen and Feng, Ruiwei and Chen, Danny Z and Wu, Jian}, booktitle={MICCAI}, year={2020}

    A Multi-featured Approach by Integrating Digital Hand and Dental X-Ray for Human Age Estimation

    Get PDF
    Traditionally, human bone age is estimated manually by inspecting the multiple body part X-ray images, which is extremely time-consuming and prone to error. The accuracy of the human estimate depends on the experience of the medical practitioner, and thus it suffers from intra- and inter-observer variability. Hence, efficient automatic approaches are required to determine human age with high accuracy. In this work, we propose a human age estimation technique using Deep Learning (DL) technique based on hand X-ray images combined with dental orthopantomographs (OPGs) is proposed. Here, the input X-ray image is pre-processed first using Non-Local Means (NLM) first, followed by Region of Interest (RoI) extraction. Later, color and position image augmentation are performed in order to balance the dataset. Thereafter, the salient features in the image are determined, and based on these features, human age estimation is carried out using the Deep Residual Network (DRN). Here, the DRN is trained using the Beluga whale lion optimization (BWLO) algorithm. Furthermore, the BWLO_DRN is examined for its superiority considering the model accuracy and is found to obtain value of 90.1% on hand-wrist and 89.9% OPG real time dataset, thus showing superior performance for hand-wrist images

    Comparison among bone age assessment methods and development of a Fishman-based skeletal maturity determination system using deep learning in contemporary Korean children and adolescents

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์น˜์˜ํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™์› ์น˜์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2020. 8. ํ—ˆ๋ฏผ์„.Purpose Greulich-Pyle (GP), Tanner-Whitehouse 3 (TW3), and Fishman methods are typically employed for bone age assessment from hand-wrist radiographs. This study aimed to compare the Fishman method with the GP and TW3 methods and investigate the reliability of Fishmans skeletal maturity indicators (SMIs) for contemporary healthy Korean children and adolescents, and to develop a new fully-automated SMI-based skeletal maturity determination system using deep neural networks and evaluate the accuracy of the system. Materials and Methods The left hand-wrist radiographs of 1,617 subjects (706 males and 911 females; 6โ€“17 years of age) taken in 2012โ€“2017 were selected. Bone ages were calculated using the GP, TW3, and Fishman methods, and compared with chronological ages using paired t-test and correlation analysis. For developing a fully-automated deep learning system for skeletal maturity determination using the Fishman method, two skeletal maturity determination systems were developed and their accuracies were compared. A system was trained with an SMI-labeled dataset, and another one was trained with a dataset that was not only labeled with SMIs but was additionally labeled considering the region of interest (ROI) extraction and skeletal maturity determination for each ROI. Two oral and maxillofacial radiologists established a reference standard for the SMIs. Results The bone ages significantly differed with the chronological ages in the whole group and gender subgroups for all three methods except in the male group for the TW3 method. However, a high degree of correlation was observed between the chronological ages and the bone ages when evaluated by all the methods. For the skeletal maturity determination system that was trained using the dataset labeled with only SMIs, the mean absolute error (MAE) was 0.88 and the within-1 concordance rate was 73.1 %. Conversely, the system consisting of ROI extraction, ROI-based skeletal maturity determination, and final SMI prediction showed much better outcomes; the MAE was 0.34 and the within-1 concordance rate was 93.7 %. Conclusions In this study, Fishmans SMI was confirmed as a reliable index for the determination of skeletal maturity from hand-wrist radiographs. A developed deep learning system automated the entire process consisting of ROI extraction, skeletal maturity determination for each ROI, and final SMI prediction. The systems accuracy in predicting skeletal maturity was outstanding. Thus, the system presented in this study can be applied effectively to determine the skeletal maturity of contemporary Korean children and adolescents.๋ชฉ์  ์ˆ˜์™„๋ถ€๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ๋ น ํ‰๊ฐ€์—๋Š” Greulich-Pyle(GP)๋ฒ•, Tanner-Whitehous 3(TW3)๋ฒ• ๋ฐ Fishman๋ฒ•์ด ์ฃผ๋กœ ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฑด๊ฐ•ํ•œ ํ˜„๋Œ€ ํ•œ๊ตญ ์†Œ์•„ ๋ฐ ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ์ˆ˜์™„๋ถ€๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์œ„์˜ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ณจ๋ น ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์—ฌ Fishman์˜ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„์ง€์ˆ˜(skeletal maturity indicator; SMI)์˜ ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๊ณ , SMI๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ฌ์ธต ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ์ธก์ • ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•œ ํ›„ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์žฌ๋ฃŒ ๋ฐ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ• ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด 2012-2017๋…„์— ์ดฌ์˜๋œ ์ขŒ์ธก ์ˆ˜์™„๋ถ€๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ 1,617๋งค(๋‚จ: 706, ์—ฌ: 911; ์—ฐ๋ น 6-17์„ธ)๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. GP๋ฒ•, TW3๋ฒ• ๋ฐ Fishman๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ ๊ณจ๋ น๊ณผ ์—ฐ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์  ์—ฐ๋ น์˜ ๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋Œ€์‘ ํ‘œ๋ณธ t ๊ฒ€์ • ๋ฐ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„ ๋ถ„์„์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋น„๊ต ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ Fishman๋ฒ•์— ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ์™„์ „ ์ž๋™ํ™” ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ ์ž, SMI๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ผ๋ฒจ๋งํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํ•™์Šต์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๊ณผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„, ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„ ๋ณ„ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ๋ฐ SMI๋กœ ๋ผ๋ฒจ๋งํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํ•™์Šต์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฐ๊ฐ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด๋“ค์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. SMI์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ฐธ์กฐ ํ‘œ์ค€์€ ์˜์ƒ์น˜์˜ํ•™ ํŒ๋…์˜ 2์ธ์ด ํ† ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž‘์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ TW3๋ฒ•์˜ ๋‚จ์„ฑ ๊ทธ๋ฃน์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ ๋Š” 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ์žˆ์–ด ์ „์ฒด ๊ทธ๋ฃน ๋ฐ ์„ฑ๋ณ„ ํ•˜์œ„๊ทธ๋ฃน์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋ น๊ณผ ์—ฐ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์  ์—ฐ๋ น ์‚ฌ์ด์— ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ 3๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์—์„œ ๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ณจ๋ น๊ณผ ์—ฐ๋Œ€๊ธฐ์  ์—ฐ๋ น ์‚ฌ์ด์— ๋†’์€ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๊ฐ€ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. SMI๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ผ๋ฒจ๋งํ•œ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ํ•™์Šต์„ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, SMI์˜ ํ‰๊ท  ์ ˆ๋Œ€ ์˜ค์ฐจ ๊ฐ’์ด 0.88, 1๋“ฑ๊ธ‰ ๋‚ด ์ผ์น˜๋„๋Š” 73.1 %์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„ ์ถ”์ถœ, ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„ ๋ณ„ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€ ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ข… SMI ํ‰๊ฐ€๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, ๋ณด๋‹ค ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด์–ด ๊ทธ ๊ฐ’์ด ๊ฐ๊ฐ 0.34, 93.7 %์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฒฐ๋ก  ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ Fishman์˜ SMI๋Š” ์ˆ˜์™„๋ถ€๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์˜์ƒ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ์ธก์ •์— ์žˆ์–ด ์‹ ๋ขฐํ•  ๋งŒํ•œ ์ฒ™๋„๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„ ์ถ”์ถœ, ๊ด€์‹ฌ ๋ถ€์œ„ ๋ณ„ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ์ธก์ • ๋ฐ ์ตœ์ข… SMI ์˜ˆ์ธก์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜๋Š” ์ „ ๊ณผ์ •์„ ์ž๋™ํ™”ํ•œ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์ด ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ์ธก์ •์— ์žˆ์–ด ์šฐ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ฃผ์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋œ ๋”ฅ๋Ÿฌ๋‹ ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์€ ํ˜„๋Œ€ ํ•œ๊ตญ ์•„๋™ ๋ฐ ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„์˜ ๊ณจ๊ฒฉ ์„ฑ์ˆ™๋„ ์ธก์ •์— ์œ ํšจํ•˜๊ฒŒ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์„ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค.I. Introduction 1 II. Materials and Methods 8 III. Results 21 IV. Discussion 33 V. Conclusion 38 VI. References 39 Abstract(Korean) 43Docto

    Aerospace medicine and biology: A continuing bibliography with indexes, supplement 190, February 1979

    Get PDF
    This bibliography lists 235 reports, articles, and other documents introduced into the NASA scientific and technical information system in January 1979

    MedGAN: Medical Image Translation using GANs

    Full text link
    Image-to-image translation is considered a new frontier in the field of medical image analysis, with numerous potential applications. However, a large portion of recent approaches offers individualized solutions based on specialized task-specific architectures or require refinement through non-end-to-end training. In this paper, we propose a new framework, named MedGAN, for medical image-to-image translation which operates on the image level in an end-to-end manner. MedGAN builds upon recent advances in the field of generative adversarial networks (GANs) by merging the adversarial framework with a new combination of non-adversarial losses. We utilize a discriminator network as a trainable feature extractor which penalizes the discrepancy between the translated medical images and the desired modalities. Moreover, style-transfer losses are utilized to match the textures and fine-structures of the desired target images to the translated images. Additionally, we present a new generator architecture, titled CasNet, which enhances the sharpness of the translated medical outputs through progressive refinement via encoder-decoder pairs. Without any application-specific modifications, we apply MedGAN on three different tasks: PET-CT translation, correction of MR motion artefacts and PET image denoising. Perceptual analysis by radiologists and quantitative evaluations illustrate that the MedGAN outperforms other existing translation approaches.Comment: 16 pages, 8 figure

    A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis

    Full text link
    Deep learning algorithms, in particular convolutional networks, have rapidly become a methodology of choice for analyzing medical images. This paper reviews the major deep learning concepts pertinent to medical image analysis and summarizes over 300 contributions to the field, most of which appeared in the last year. We survey the use of deep learning for image classification, object detection, segmentation, registration, and other tasks and provide concise overviews of studies per application area. Open challenges and directions for future research are discussed.Comment: Revised survey includes expanded discussion section and reworked introductory section on common deep architectures. Added missed papers from before Feb 1st 201
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore