7,984 research outputs found
Expressiveness and Completeness in Abstraction
We study two notions of expressiveness, which have appeared in abstraction
theory for model checking, and find them incomparable in general. In
particular, we show that according to the most widely used notion, the class of
Kripke Modal Transition Systems is strictly less expressive than the class of
Generalised Kripke Modal Transition Systems (a generalised variant of Kripke
Modal Transition Systems equipped with hypertransitions). Furthermore, we
investigate the ability of an abstraction framework to prove a formula with a
finite abstract model, a property known as completeness. We address the issue
of completeness from a general perspective: the way it depends on certain
abstraction parameters, as well as its relationship with expressiveness.Comment: In Proceedings EXPRESS/SOS 2012, arXiv:1208.244
Metamodel-based model conformance and multiview consistency checking
Model-driven development, using languages such as UML and BON, often makes use of multiple diagrams (e.g., class and sequence diagrams) when modeling systems. These diagrams, presenting different views of a system of interest, may be inconsistent. A metamodel provides a unifying framework in which to ensure and check consistency, while at the same time providing the means to distinguish between valid and invalid models, that is, conformance. Two formal specifications of the metamodel for an object-oriented modeling language are presented, and it is shown how to use these specifications for model conformance and multiview consistency checking. Comparisons are made in terms of completeness and the level of automation each provide for checking multiview consistency and model conformance. The lessons learned from applying formal techniques to the problems of metamodeling, model conformance, and multiview consistency checking are summarized
Generalized Strong Preservation by Abstract Interpretation
Standard abstract model checking relies on abstract Kripke structures which
approximate concrete models by gluing together indistinguishable states, namely
by a partition of the concrete state space. Strong preservation for a
specification language L encodes the equivalence of concrete and abstract model
checking of formulas in L. We show how abstract interpretation can be used to
design abstract models that are more general than abstract Kripke structures.
Accordingly, strong preservation is generalized to abstract
interpretation-based models and precisely related to the concept of
completeness in abstract interpretation. The problem of minimally refining an
abstract model in order to make it strongly preserving for some language L can
be formulated as a minimal domain refinement in abstract interpretation in
order to get completeness w.r.t. the logical/temporal operators of L. It turns
out that this refined strongly preserving abstract model always exists and can
be characterized as a greatest fixed point. As a consequence, some well-known
behavioural equivalences, like bisimulation, simulation and stuttering, and
their corresponding partition refinement algorithms can be elegantly
characterized in abstract interpretation as completeness properties and
refinements
A Static Analyzer for Large Safety-Critical Software
We show that abstract interpretation-based static program analysis can be
made efficient and precise enough to formally verify a class of properties for
a family of large programs with few or no false alarms. This is achieved by
refinement of a general purpose static analyzer and later adaptation to
particular programs of the family by the end-user through parametrization. This
is applied to the proof of soundness of data manipulation operations at the
machine level for periodic synchronous safety critical embedded software. The
main novelties are the design principle of static analyzers by refinement and
adaptation through parametrization, the symbolic manipulation of expressions to
improve the precision of abstract transfer functions, the octagon, ellipsoid,
and decision tree abstract domains, all with sound handling of rounding errors
in floating point computations, widening strategies (with thresholds, delayed)
and the automatic determination of the parameters (parametrized packing)
Sciduction: Combining Induction, Deduction, and Structure for Verification and Synthesis
Even with impressive advances in automated formal methods, certain problems
in system verification and synthesis remain challenging. Examples include the
verification of quantitative properties of software involving constraints on
timing and energy consumption, and the automatic synthesis of systems from
specifications. The major challenges include environment modeling,
incompleteness in specifications, and the complexity of underlying decision
problems.
This position paper proposes sciduction, an approach to tackle these
challenges by integrating inductive inference, deductive reasoning, and
structure hypotheses. Deductive reasoning, which leads from general rules or
concepts to conclusions about specific problem instances, includes techniques
such as logical inference and constraint solving. Inductive inference, which
generalizes from specific instances to yield a concept, includes algorithmic
learning from examples. Structure hypotheses are used to define the class of
artifacts, such as invariants or program fragments, generated during
verification or synthesis. Sciduction constrains inductive and deductive
reasoning using structure hypotheses, and actively combines inductive and
deductive reasoning: for instance, deductive techniques generate examples for
learning, and inductive reasoning is used to guide the deductive engines.
We illustrate this approach with three applications: (i) timing analysis of
software; (ii) synthesis of loop-free programs, and (iii) controller synthesis
for hybrid systems. Some future applications are also discussed
- …