Relating Strand Spaces and Distributed Temporal Logic for Security Protocol Analysis

In previous work, we introduced a version of distributed temporal logic that is well-suited both for verifying security protocols and as a metalogic for reasoning about, and relating, different security protocol models. In this paper, we formally investigate the relationship between our approach and strand spaces, which is one of the most successful and widespread formalisms for analyzing security protocols. We define translations between models in our logic and strand-space models of security protocols, and we compare the results obtained with respect to the level of abstraction that is inherent in each of the formalisms. This allows us to clarify different aspects of strand spaces that are often left implicit, as well as pave the way to transfer results, techniques and tools across the two approache

Anonymity and Information Hiding in Multiagent Systems

We provide a framework for reasoning about information-hiding requirements in multiagent systems and for reasoning about anonymity in particular. Our framework employs the modal logic of knowledge within the context of the runs and systems framework, much in the spirit of our earlier work on secrecy [Halpern and O'Neill 2002]. We give several definitions of anonymity with respect to agents, actions, and observers in multiagent systems, and we relate our definitions of anonymity to other definitions of information hiding, such as secrecy. We also give probabilistic definitions of anonymity that are able to quantify an observer s uncertainty about the state of the system. Finally, we relate our definitions of anonymity to other formalizations of anonymity and information hiding, including definitions of anonymity in the process algebra CSP and definitions of information hiding using function views.Comment: Replacement. 36 pages. Full version of CSFW '03 paper, submitted to JCS. Made substantial changes to Section 6; added references throughou

Integration of analysis techniques in security and fault-tolerance

This thesis focuses on the study of integration of formal methodologies in security protocol analysis and fault-tolerance analysis. The research is developed in two different directions: interdisciplinary and intra-disciplinary. In the former, we look for a beneficial interaction between strategies of analysis in security protocols and fault-tolerance; in the latter, we search for connections among different approaches of analysis within the security area. In the following we summarize the main results of the research

Synthesising end-to-end security schemes through endorsement intermediaries

Composing secure interaction protocols dynamically for e-commerce continue to pose a number of challenges, such as lack of standard notations for expressing requirements and the difficulty involved in enforcing them. Furthermore, interaction with unknown entities may require finding common trusted intermediaries. Securing messages sent through such intermediaries require schemes that provide end-to-end security guarantees. In the past, e-commerce protocols such as SET were created to provide such end-to-end guarantees. However, such complex hand crafted protocols proved difficult to model check. This thesis addresses the end-to-end problems in an open dynamic setting where trust relationships evolve, and requirements of interacting entities change over time. Before interaction protocols can be synthesised, a number of research questions must be addressed. Firstly, to meet end-to-end security requirements, the security level along the message path must be made to reflect the requirements. Secondly, the type of endorsement intermediaries must reflect the message category. Thirdly, intermediaries must be made liable for their endorsements. This thesis proposes a number of solutions to address the research problems. End-to-end security requirements were arrived by aggregating security requirements of all interacting parties. These requirements were enforced by interleaving and composing basic schemes derived from challenge-response mechanisms. The institutional trust promoting mechanism devised allowed all vital data to be endorsed by authorised category specific intermediaries. Intermediaries were made accountable for their endorsements by being required to discharge or transfer proof obligations placed on them. The techniques devised for aggregating and enforcing security requirements allow dynamic creation of end-to-end security schemes. The novel interleaving technique devised allows creation of provably secure multiparty schemes for any number of recipients. The structured technique combining compositional approach with appropriate invariants and preconditions makes model checking of synthesised schemes unnecessary. The proposed framework combining endorsement trust with schemes making intermediaries accountable provides a way to alleviate distrust between previously unknown e-commerce entities

DRM and Privacy

Interrogating the relationship between copyright enforcement and privacy raises deeper questions about the nature of privacy and what counts, or ought to count, as privacy invasion in the age of networked digital technologies. This Article begins, in Part II, by identifying the privacy interests that individuals enjoy in their intellectual activities and exploring the different ways in which certain implementations of DRM technologies may threaten those interests. Part III considers the appropriate scope of legal protection for privacy in the context of DRM, and argues that both the common law of privacy and an expanded conception of consumer protection law have roles to play in protecting the privacy of information users. As Parts II and III demonstrate, consideration of how the theory and law of privacy should respond to the development and implementation of DRM technologies also raises the reverse question: How should the development and implementation of DRM technologies respond to privacy theory and law? As artifacts designed to regulate user behavior, DRM technologies already embody value choices. Might privacy itself become one of the values embodied in DRM design? Part IV argues that with some conceptual and procedural adjustments, DRM technologies and related standard-setting processes could be harnessed to preserve and protect privacy