Refunctionalization at Work

We present the left inverse of Reynolds's defunctionalization and we show its relevance to programming and to programming languages. We present two methods to put a program that is almost in defunctionalized form into one that is actually in defunctionalized form, and we illustrate them with a recognizer for Dyck words and with Dijkstra's shunting-yard algorithm

Refunctionalization at Work

We present the left inverse of Reynolds's defunctionalization and we show its relevance to programming and to programming languages. We propose two methods to transform a program that is almost in defunctionalized form into one that is actually in defunctionalized form, and we illustrate them with a recognizer for Dyck words and with Dijkstra's shunting-yard algorithm

A Simple Application of Lightweight Fusion to Proving the Equivalence of Abstract Machines

We show how Ohori and Sasano's recent lightweight fusion by fixed-point promotion provides a simple way to prove the equivalence of the two standard styles of specification of abstract machines: (1) as a transition function together with a `driver loop' implementing the iteration of this transition function; and (2) as a function directly iterating upon a configuration until reaching a final state, if ever. The equivalence hinges on the fact that the latter style of specification is a fused version of the former one. The need for such a simple proof is motivated by our recent work on syntactic correspondences between reduction semantics and abstract machines, using refocusing

On Barron and Strachey's Cartesian Product Function

Over forty years ago, David Barron and Christopher Strachey published a startlingly elegant program for the Cartesian product of a list of lists, expressing it with a three nested occurrences of the function we now call foldr. This program is remarkable for its time because of its masterful display of higher-order functions and lexical scope, and we put it forward as possibly the first ever functional pearl. We first characterize it as the result of a sequence of program transformations, and then apply similar transformations to a program for the classical power set example. We also show that using a higher-order representation of lists allows a definition of the Cartesian product function where foldr is nested only twice

On the Equivalence between Small-Step and Big-Step Abstract Machines: A Simple Application of Lightweight Fusion

We show how Ohori and Sasano's recent lightweight fusion by fixed-point promotion provides a simple way to prove the equivalence of the two standard styles of specification of abstract machines: (1) in small-step form, as a state-transition function together with a `driver loop,' i.e., a function implementing the iteration of this transition function; and (2) in big-step form, as a tail-recursive function that directly maps a given configuration to a final state, if any. The equivalence hinges on our observation that for abstract machines, fusing a small-step specification yields a big-step specification. We illustrate this observation here with a recognizer for Dyck words, the CEK machine, and Krivine's machine with call/cc. The need for such a simple proof is motivated by our current work on small-step abstract machines as obtained by refocusing a function implementing a reduction semantics (a syntactic correspondence), and big-step abstract machines as obtained by CPS-transforming and then defunctionalizing a function implementing a big-step semantics (a functional correspondence)

On One-Pass CPS Transformations

We bridge two distinct approaches to one-pass CPS transformations, i.e., CPS transformations that reduce administrative redexes at transformation time instead of in a post-processing phase. One approach is compositional and higher-order, and is independently due to Appel, Danvy and Filinski, and Wand, building on Plotkin's seminal work. The other is non-compositional and based on a reduction semantics for the lambda-calculus, and is due to Sabry and Felleisen. To relate the two approaches, we use three tools: Reynolds's defunctionalization and its left inverse, refunctionalization; a special case of fold-unfold fusion due to Ohori and Sasano, fixed-point promotion; and an implementation technique for reduction semantics due to Danvy and Nielsen, refocusing. This work is directly applicable to transforming programs into monadic normal form

An Investigation of Abadi and Cardelli's Untyped Calculus of Objects

We study the relationship between the natural (big-step) semantics and the reduction (small-step) semantics of Abadi and Cardelli's untyped calculus of objects. By applying Danvy et al.'s functional correspondence to the natural semantics, we derive an abstract machine for this calculus, and by applying Danvy et al.'s syntactic correspondence to the reduction semantics, we also derive an abstract machines for this calculus. These two abstract machines are identical. The fact that the machines are identical, and the fact that they have been derived using meaning-preserving program transformations, entail that the derivation constitutes a proof of equivalence between natural semantics and the reduction semantics. The derivational nature of our proof contrasts with Abadi and Cardelli's soundness proof, which was carried out by pen and paper. We also note that the abstract machine is new. To move closer to actual language implementations, we reformulate the calculus to use explicit substitutions. The reformulated calculus is new. By applying the functional and syntactic correspondences to natural and reduction semantics of this new calculus, we again obtain two abstract machines. These two machines are also identical, and as such, they establish the equivalence of the natural semantics and the reduction semantics of the new calculus. Finally, we prove that the two abstract machines are strongly bisimilar. Therefore, the two calculi are computationally equivalent

A Rational Deconstruction of Landin's SECD Machine with the J Operator

Landin's SECD machine was the first abstract machine for applicative expressions, i.e., functional programs. Landin's J operator was the first control operator for functional languages, and was specified by an extension of the SECD machine. We present a family of evaluation functions corresponding to this extension of the SECD machine, using a series of elementary transformations (transformation into continu-ation-passing style (CPS) and defunctionalization, chiefly) and their left inverses (transformation into direct style and refunctionalization). To this end, we modernize the SECD machine into a bisimilar one that operates in lockstep with the original one but that (1) does not use a data stack and (2) uses the caller-save rather than the callee-save convention for environments. We also identify that the dump component of the SECD machine is managed in a callee-save way. The caller-save counterpart of the modernized SECD machine precisely corresponds to Thielecke's double-barrelled continuations and to Felleisen's encoding of J in terms of call/cc. We then variously characterize the J operator in terms of CPS and in terms of delimited-control operators in the CPS hierarchy. As a byproduct, we also present several reduction semantics for applicative expressions with the J operator, based on Curien's original calculus of explicit substitutions. These reduction semantics mechanically correspond to the modernized versions of the SECD machine and to the best of our knowledge, they provide the first syntactic theories of applicative expressions with the J operator