Implementation and Comparison of Mobility Models in NS-2

In the performance evaluation of a protocol for an ad hoc network, the protocol should be tested under realistic conditions including, but not limited to, a sensible transmission range, limited buffer space for the storage of messages, representative data traffic models, and realistic movements of the mobile users (i.e., a mobility model). Simulation is universally considered the most effective method of designing and evaluating new network protocols. When developing protocols for mobile networking, the chosen mobility model is one of the key determinants in the success of an accurate simulation. The main role of a mobility model is to mimic the movement behaviors of actual users. Given the critical role of the mobility model in supporting realistic and accurate protocol simulations, its correct design and selection is essential .We have described 3 mobility models that represent mobile nodes whose movements are independent of each other (i.e., entity mobility models). Lastly, we present simulation results that illustrate the importance of choosing a mobility model in the simulation of an ad hoc network protocol. Specifically, we illustrate how the performance results of an ad hoc network protocol drastically change as a result of changing the mobility model simulated

A Classification and Performance Comparison of Mobility Models for Ad Hoc Networks

Abstract. In mobile ad hoc network research, simulation plays an important role in determining the network characteristics and measuring performance. On the other hand, unrealistic simulation conditions may be misleading, instead of being explanatory. For this reason, constructing simulation models closer to the real circumstances is very significant. Movement behavior of mobile entities is one of the most important concepts for the realistic simulation scenarios in mo-bile ad hoc networks. In this study, we first provide a survey and a new hybrid classification of existing mobility models in the literature. We implemented the random direction and boundless simulation area models on Scalable Wireless Ad Hoc Network Simulator (SWANS) and conducted simulations of Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV) protocol for these as well as the random walk and random waypoint models. Our comparative results for the mobility models are discussed on a variety of simulation settings and parameters.

Simulation of Distributed Wireless Networked Control Systems over MANET using OPNET

This paper investigates the simulation of distributed Wireless Networked Control Systems (WNCS) over Mobile Ad-hoc NETwork (MANET). The simulation model includes multiple plants with a single controller and random node mobility. The widely used network simulation software OPtimised Network Engineering Tool (OPNET) has been utilised to implement a realistic wireless signal propagation model using path loss and fading effects. System performances for two ad-hoc network routing protocols: DSR and AODV have been explored

Mobility Models for Vehicular Communications

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15497-8_11The experimental evaluation of vehicular ad hoc networks (VANETs) implies elevate economic cost and organizational complexity, especially in presence of solutions that target large-scale deployments. As performance evaluation is however mandatory prior to the actual implementation of VANETs, simulation has established as the de-facto standard for the analysis of dedicated network protocols and architectures. The vehicular environment makes network simulation particularly challenging, as it requires the faithful modelling not only of the network stack, but also of all phenomena linked to road traffic dynamics and radio-frequency signal propagation in highly mobile environments. In this chapter, we will focus on the first aspect, and discuss the representation of mobility in VANET simulations. Specifically, we will present the requirements of a dependable simulation, and introduce models of the road infrastructure, of the driver’s behaviour, and of the traffic dynamics. We will also outline the evolution of simulation tools implementing such models, and provide a hands-on example of reliable vehicular mobility modelling for VANET simulation.Manzoni, P.; Fiore, M.; Uppoor, S.; Martínez Domínguez, FJ.; Tavares De Araujo Cesariny Calafate, CM.; Cano Escribá, JC. (2015). Mobility Models for Vehicular Communications. En Vehicular ad hoc Networks. Standards, Solutions, and Research. Springer. 309-333. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-15497-8_11S309333Bai F, Sadagopan N, Helmy A (2003) The IMPORTANT framework for analyzing the impact of mobility on performance of routing protocols for adhoc networks. Elsevier Ad Hoc Netw1:383–403Baumann R, Legendre F, Sommer P (2008) Generic mobility simulation framework (GMSF). In: ACM mobility modelsBononi L, Di Felice M, D’Angelo G, Bracuto M, Donatiello L (2008) MoVES: A framework for parallel and distributed simulation of wireless vehicular ad hoc networks. Comput Netw 52(1):155–179Cabspotting Project (2006) San Francisco exploratorium’s invisible dynamics initiative. http://cabspotting.org/index.htmlCamp T, Boleng J, Davies V (2002) A survey of mobility models for ad hoc network research. Wirel Commun Mobile Comput 2(5):483–502. Special issue on Mobile Ad Hoc Networking: Research, Trends and ApplicationsCavin D, Sasson Y, Schiper A (2002) On the accuracy of MANET simulators. In: Proceedings of the second ACM international workshop on principles of mobile computing. ACM, New York, pp 38–43Choffnes D, Bustamante F (2005) An integrated mobility and traffic model for vehicular wireless networks. In: ACM VANETDavies V (2000) Evaluating mobility models within an ad hoc network. Master’s thesis, Colorado School of Mines, Boulder, Etats-UnisEhling M, Bihler W (1996) Zeit im Blickfeld. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Zeitbudgeterhebung. In: Blanke K, Ehling M, Schwarz N (eds) Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend, vol 121. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, pp 237–274ETH Laboratory for Software Technology (2009) K. Nagel. http://www.lst.inf.ethz.ch/research/ad-hoc/car-traces/Fiore M, Härri J (2008) The networking shape of vehicular mobility. In: ACM MobiHoc, Hong Kong, ChinaFiore M, Haerri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2007) Vehicular mobility simulation for VANETS. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual simulation symposium (ANSS 2007), Norfolk, VAFleetnet Project - Internet on the Road (2000) NEC Laboratories Europe. http://www.neclab.eu/Projects/fleetnet.htmGawron C (1998) An iterative algorithm to determine the dynamic user equilibrium in a traffic simulation model. Int J Mod Phys C 9(3):393–407Haerri J, Filali F, Bonnet C (2009) Mobility models for vehicular ad hoc networks: a survey and taxonomy. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 11(4):19–41. doi: 10.1109/SURV.2009.090403 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SURV.2009.090403Härri J, Fiore M, Filali F, Bonnet C (2011) Vehicular mobility simulation with VanetMobiSim. Simulation 87(4):275–300. doi: 10.1177/0037549709345997 . http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0037549709345997Hertkorn G, Wagner P (2004) The application of microscopic activity based travel demand modelling in large scale simulations. In: World conference on transport researchHuang E, Hu W, Crowcroft J, Wassell I (2005) Towards commercial mobile ad hoc network applications: a radio dispatch system. In: Sixth ACM international symposium on mobile ad hoc networking and computing (MobiHoc 2005), Urbana-Champaign, ILJaap S, Bechler M, Wolf L (2005) Evaluation of routing protocols for vehicular ad hoc networks in city traffic scenarios. In: ITSTJardosh A, Belding-Royer E, Almeroth K, Suri S (2003) Towards realistic mobility models for mobile ad hoc networks. In: ACM/IEEE international conference on mobile computing and networking (MobiCom 2003), San Diego, CAKim J, Sridhara V, Bohacek S (2009) Realistic mobility simulation of urban mesh networks. Ad Hoc Netw 7(2):411–430Krajzewicz D (2009) Kombination von taktischen und strategischen Einflüssen in einer mikroskopischen Verkehrsflusssimulation. In: Jürgensohn T, Kolrep H (eds) Fahrermodellierung in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, pp 104–115Krajzewicz D, Blokpoel RJ, Cartolano F, Cataldi P, Gonzalez A, Lazaro O, Leguay J, Lin L, Maneros J, Rondinone M (2010) iTETRIS - a system for the evaluation of cooperative traffic management solutions. In: Advanced microsystems for automotive applications 2010, VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin, pp 399–410Krajzewicz D, Erdmann J, Behrisch M, Bieker L (2012) Recent development and applications of SUMO—simulation of urban mobility. Int J Adv Syst Measur 5(3/4):128–138Krauss S (1998) Microscopic modeling of traffic flow: investigation of collision free vehicle dynamics. Ph.D. thesis, Universität zu KölnKrauss S, Wagner P, Gawron C (1997) Metastable states in a microscopic model of traffic flow. Phys Rev E 55(304):55–97Legendre F, Borrel V, Dias de Amorim M, Fdida S (2006) Reconsidering microscopic mobility modeling for self-organizing networks. Network IEEE 20(6):4–12. doi: 10.1109/MNET.2006.273114Mangharam R, Weller D, Rajkumar R, Mudalige P (2006) GrooveNet: a hybrid simulator for vehicle-to-vehicle networks. In: IEEE MobiquitousMartinez FJ, Cano JC, Calafate CT, Manzoni P (2008) Citymob: a mobility model pattern generator for VANETs. In: IEEE vehicular networks and applications workshop (Vehi-Mobi, held with ICC), BeijingMiller J, Horowitz E (2007) FreeSim: a free real-time freeway traffic simulator. In: IEEE ITSCNagel K, Schreckenberg M (1992) A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. J Phys I 2(12):2221–2229Nagel K, Wolf D, Wagner P, Simon P (1998) Two-lane traffic rules for cellular automata: a systematic approach. Phys Rev E 58:1425–1437NOW - Network on Wheels Project (2008) Hartenstein H, Härri J, Torrent-Moreno M. https://dsn.tm.kit.edu/english/projects_now-project.phpPiorkowski M, Raya M, Lugo A, Papadimitratos P, Grossglauser M, Hubaux JP (2008) TraNS: realistic joint traffic and network simulator for VANETs. ACM Mobile Comput Commun Rev 12(1):31–33Rindsfüser G, Ansorge J, Mühlhans H (2002) Aktivitätenvorhaben. In: Beckmann K (ed) SimVV Mobilität verstehen und lenken—zu einer integrierten quantitativen Gesamtsicht und Mikrosimulation von Verkehr, Ministry of School, Science and Research of Nordrhein-WestfalenSaha A, Johnson D (2004) Modeling mobility for vehicular ad hoc networks. In: ACM VANETSeskar I, Maric S, Holtzman J, Wasserman J (1992) Rate of location area updates in cellular systems. In: IEEE 42nd vehicular technology conference, 1992, vol 2, pp 694–697. doi: 10.1109/VETEC.1992.245478Sommer C, German R, Dressler F (2011) Bidirectionally coupled network and road traffic simulation for improved ivc analysis. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 10(1):3–15Tian J, Haehner J, Becker C, Stepanov I, Rothermel K (2002) Graph-based mobility model for mobile ad hoc network simulation. In: SCS ANSS, San DiegoTreiber M, Helbing D (2002) Realistische mikrosimulation von strassenverkehr mit einem einfachen modell. In: ASIM, Rostock, AllemagneTreiber M, Hennecke A, Helbing D (2000) Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations. Phys Rev E 62(2):1805–1824UDel Models for Simulation of Urban Mobile Wireless Networks (2009) Stephan Bohacek. http://www.udelmodels.eecis.udel.eduUMass DieselNet Project (2009) UMass diverse outdoor mobile environment (DOME). https://dome.cs.umass.edu/umassdieselnetUppoor S, Trullols-Cruces O, Fiore M, Barcelo-Ordinas JM (2015) Generation and analysis of a large-scale urban vehicular mobility dataset. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 1:1. PrePrints. doi: 10.1109/TMC.2013.27Varschen C, Wagner P (2006) Mikroskopische Modellierung der Personenverkehrsnachfrage auf Basis von Zeitverwendungstagebuchern. Stadt Region Land 81:63–69Yoon J, Liu M, Noble B (2003) Random waypoint considered harmful. In: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOMM 2003, San Francisco, CAZheng Q, Hong X, Liu J (2006) An agenda-based mobility model. In: 39th IEEE annual simulation symposium (ANSS-39-2006), Huntsville, A

Modelling and performance analysis of mobile ad hoc networks

PhD ThesisMobile Ad hoc Networks (MANETs) are becoming very attractive and useful in many kinds of communication and networking applications. This is due to their efficiency, relatively low cost, and flexibility provided by their dynamic infrastructure. Performance evaluation of mobile ad hoc networks is needed to compare various architectures of the network for their performance, study the effect of varying certain network parameters and study the interaction between various parameters that characterise the network. It can help in the design and implementation of MANETs. It is to be noted that most of the research that studies the performance of MANETs were evaluated using discrete event simulation (DES) utilising a broad band of network simulators. The principle drawback of DES models is the time and resources needed to run such models for large realistic systems, especially when results with a high accuracy are desired. In addition, studying typical problems such as the deadlock and concurrency in MANETs using DES is hard because network simulators implement the network at a low abstraction level and cannot support specifications at higher levels. Due to the advantage of quick construction and numerical analysis, analytical modelling techniques, such as stochastic Petri nets and process algebra, have been used for performance analysis of communication systems. In addition, analytical modelling is a less costly and more efficient method. It generally provides the best insight into the effects of various parameters and their interactions. Hence, analytical modelling is the method of choice for a fast and cost effective evaluation of mobile ad hoc networks. To the best of our knowledge, there is no analytical study that analyses the performance of multi-hop ad hoc networks, where mobile nodes move according to a random mobility model, in terms of the end-to-end delay and throughput. This work ii presents a novel analytical framework developed using stochastic reward nets and mathematical modelling techniques for modelling and analysis of multi-hop ad hoc networks, based on the IEEE 802.11 DCF MAC protocol, where mobile nodes move according to the random waypoint mobility model. The proposed framework is used to analysis the performance of multi-hop ad hoc networks as a function of network parameters such as the transmission range, carrier sensing range, interference range, number of nodes, network area size, packet size, and packet generation rate. The proposed framework is organized into several models to break up the complexity of modelling the complete network and make it easier to analyse each model as required. This is based on the idea of decomposition and fixed point iteration of stochastic reward nets. The proposed framework consists of a mathematical model and four stochastic reward nets models; the path analysis model, data link layer model, network layer model and transport layer model. These models are arranged in a way similar to the layers of the OSI protocol stack model. The mathematical model is used to compute the expected number of hops between any source-destination pair; and the average number of carrier sensing, hidden, and interfering nodes. The path analysis model analyses the dynamic of paths in the network due to the node mobility in terms of the path connection availability and rate of failure and repair. The data link layer model describes the behaviour of the IEEE 802.11 DCF MAC protocol. The actions in the network layer are modelled by the network layer model. The transport layer model represents the behaviour of the transport layer protocols. The proposed models are validated using extensive simulations

Performance evaluation of an efficient counter-based scheme for mobile ad hoc networks based on realistic mobility model

Flooding is the simplest and commonly used mechanism for broadcasting in mobile ad hoc networks (MANETs). Despite its simplicity, it can result in high redundant retransmission, contention and collision in the network, a phenomenon referred to as broadcast storm problem. Several probabilistic broadcast schemes have been proposed to mitigate this problem inherent with flooding. Recently, we have proposed a hybrid-based scheme as one of the probabilistic scheme, which combines the advantages of pure probabilistic and counter-based schemes to yield a significant performance improvement. Despite these considerable numbers of proposed broadcast schemes, majority of these schemes’ performance evaluation was based on random waypoint model. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of our broadcast scheme using a community based mobility model which is based on social network theory and compare it against widely used random waypoint mobility model. Simulation results have shown that using unrealistic movement pattern does not truly reflect on the actual performance of the scheme in terms of saved-rebroadcast, reachability and end to end delay

MEASURING THE EFFECT OF CBR AND TCP TRAFFIC MODELS OVER DYMO ROUTING PROTOCOL

A Mobile Ad hoc Network MANET are classified as single or multihop wireless network in which nodes can freely move and dynamically self-organize also the network is highly dynamic in terms of topological changes Mobile nodes can communicate with themselves without any need of predefined infrastructure But due to the dynamic nature of MANETs in terms of mobility and no infrastructure they are provided with limited bandwidth and limited battery power Due to these characteristics the MANETs are best suited for military operations in battlefield grounds Disaster relief and rescue operations Choosing the mobility model is very much crucial for specific application area that represents the moving behaviour of a mobile node that should be realistic Changing the mobility scenario allows changes in routing performance of a routing protocol in terms of routing metrics such as Delays Throughput and Routing Overhead etc within the current application area Main aim of this research paper focus to study the effects of Transmission Control Protocol TCP and Constant Bit Rate CBR from different angles over Dynamic MANET on demand routing protocol known as DYMO in order to find out the performance degradation on the basis of Data packets and Control packets Using the Network Simulator 2 experimental results show that functions of the routing protocol vary across different parameters like sending and receiving ratio of data packets and numbers of Control packets send during the simulation perio