350 research outputs found

    SDDs are Exponentially More Succinct than OBDDs

    Full text link
    Introduced by Darwiche (2011), sentential decision diagrams (SDDs) are essentially as tractable as ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs), but tend to be more succinct in practice. This makes SDDs a prominent representation language, with many applications in artificial intelligence and knowledge compilation. We prove that SDDs are more succinct than OBDDs also in theory, by constructing a family of boolean functions where each member has polynomial SDD size but exponential OBDD size. This exponential separation improves a quasipolynomial separation recently established by Razgon (2013), and settles an open problem in knowledge compilation

    Proof Complexity of Systems of (Non-Deterministic) Decision Trees and Branching Programs

    Get PDF
    This paper studies propositional proof systems in which lines are sequents of decision trees or branching programs, deterministic or non-deterministic. Decision trees (DTs) are represented by a natural term syntax, inducing the system LDT, and non-determinism is modelled by including disjunction, ?, as primitive (system LNDT). Branching programs generalise DTs to dag-like structures and are duly handled by extension variables in our setting, as is common in proof complexity (systems eLDT and eLNDT). Deterministic and non-deterministic branching programs are natural nonuniform analogues of log-space (L) and nondeterministic log-space (NL), respectively. Thus eLDT and eLNDT serve as natural systems of reasoning corresponding to L and NL, respectively. The main results of the paper are simulation and non-simulation results for tree-like and dag-like proofs in LDT, LNDT, eLDT and eLNDT. We also compare them with Frege systems, constant-depth Frege systems and extended Frege systems

    Sums of products of polynomials in few variables : lower bounds and polynomial identity testing

    Get PDF
    We study the complexity of representing polynomials as a sum of products of polynomials in few variables. More precisely, we study representations of the form P=i=1Tj=1dQijP = \sum_{i = 1}^T \prod_{j = 1}^d Q_{ij} such that each QijQ_{ij} is an arbitrary polynomial that depends on at most ss variables. We prove the following results. 1. Over fields of characteristic zero, for every constant μ\mu such that 0μ<10 \leq \mu < 1, we give an explicit family of polynomials {PN}\{P_{N}\}, where PNP_{N} is of degree nn in N=nO(1)N = n^{O(1)} variables, such that any representation of the above type for PNP_{N} with s=Nμs = N^{\mu} requires TdnΩ(n)Td \geq n^{\Omega(\sqrt{n})}. This strengthens a recent result of Kayal and Saha [KS14a] which showed similar lower bounds for the model of sums of products of linear forms in few variables. It is known that any asymptotic improvement in the exponent of the lower bounds (even for s=ns = \sqrt{n}) would separate VP and VNP[KS14a]. 2. We obtain a deterministic subexponential time blackbox polynomial identity testing (PIT) algorithm for circuits computed by the above model when TT and the individual degree of each variable in PP are at most logO(1)N\log^{O(1)} N and sNμs \leq N^{\mu} for any constant μ<1/2\mu < 1/2. We get quasipolynomial running time when s<logO(1)Ns < \log^{O(1)} N. The PIT algorithm is obtained by combining our lower bounds with the hardness-randomness tradeoffs developed in [DSY09, KI04]. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first nontrivial PIT algorithm for this model (even for the case s=2s=2), and the first nontrivial PIT algorithm obtained from lower bounds for small depth circuits
    corecore