1,103 research outputs found

    QoE modeling for HTTP adaptive video streaming : a survey and open challenges

    Get PDF

    Look ahead to improve QoE in DASH streaming

    Full text link
    [EN] When a video is encoded with constant quality, the resulting bitstream will have variable bitrate due to the inherent nature of the video encoding process. This paper proposes a video Adaptive Bitrate Streaming (ABR) algorithm, called Look Ahead, which takes into account this bitrate variability in order to calculate, in real time, the appropriate quality level that minimizes the number of interruptions during the playback. The algorithm is based on the Dynamic Adaptive Streaming over HTTP (DASH) standard for on-demand video services. In fact, it has been implemented and integrated into ExoPlayer v2, the latest version of the library developed by Google to play DASH contents. The proposed algorithm is compared to the Müller and Segment Aware Rate Adaptation (SARA) algorithms as well as to the default ABR algorithm integrated into ExoPlayer. The comparison is carried out by using the most relevant parameters that affect the Quality of Experience (QoE) in video playback services, that is, number and duration of stalls, average quality of the video playback and number of representation switches. These parameters can be combined to define a QoE model. In this sense, this paper also proposes two new QoE models for the evaluation of ABR algorithms. One of them considers the bitrate of every segment of each representation, and the second is based on VMAF (Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion), a Video Quality Assessment (VQA) method developed by Netflix. The evaluations presented in the paper reflect: first, that Look Ahead outperforms the Müller, SARA and the ExoPlayer ABR algorithms in terms of number and duration of video playback stalls, with hardly decreasing the average video quality; and second, that the two QoE models proposed are more accurate than other similar models existing in the literature.This work is supported by the PAID-10-18 Program of the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia (Ayudas para contratos de acceso al sistema espanol de Ciencia, Tecnologia e Innovacion, en estructuras de investigacion de la Universitat Politecnica de Valencia) and by the Project 20180810 from the Universitat Politecnica de Valencia ("Tecnologias de distribucion y procesado de informacion multimedia y QoE").Belda Ortega, R.; De Fez Lava, I.; Arce Vila, P.; Guerri Cebollada, JC. (2020). Look ahead to improve QoE in DASH streaming. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 79(33-34):25143-25170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09214-9S25143251707933-34Akhshabi S, Narayanaswamy S, Begen AC, Dovrolis C (2012) An experimental evaluation of rate-adaptive video players over HTTP. Signal process. Image Commun 27(4):271–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2011.10.003Android Developers webpage, ExoPlayer. Available online at: https://developer.android.com/guide/topics/media/exoplayer.html . Accessed: Jun. (2019)Bampis CG, Li Z, Bovik AC (2018) SpatioTemporal feature integration and model fusion for full reference video quality assessment. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Syst for Video Tech 29:2256–2270. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2018.2868262Barman N, Martini MG (2019) QoE modeling for HTTP adaptive video streaming - a survey and open challenges. IEEE Access 7:30831–30859. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2901778Belda R (2013) Algoritmo de adaptación DASH: Look Ahead. Master Thesis. Universitat Politècnica de València. http://hdl.handle.net/10251/33359 .Belda R, de Fez I, Arce P, Guerri J C (2018) Look ahead: a DASH adaptation algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Symp. On broadband multimed. Syst. And broadcast., Valencia, Spain: article no. 158. https://doi.org/10.1109/BMSB.2018.8436718 .Blender Foundation webpage. Available online at: https://www.blender.org/foundation . Accessed: Jun. (2019).Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learn 20-3:273–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022627411411DASH Industry forum webpage. Available online at: http://dashif.org . Accessed: Jun. (2019)Ghadiyaram D, Pan J, Bovik AC (2019) A subjective and objective study of stalling events in mobile streaming videos. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Syst for Video Technol 29(1):183–197. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSVT.2017.2768542Ghent University. 4G/LTE bandwidth logs. Available online at: http://users.ugent.be/~jvdrhoof/dataset-4g . Accessed: Jun. (2019).Github webpage. A DASH segment size aware rate adaptation model for DASH. Available online at: https://github.com/pari685/AStream . Accessed: Jun. (2019)GitHub website. Dashgen, Multimedia Communications Group. Available online at: https://github.com/comm-iteam/dashgen . Accessed: Jun. (2019).van der Hooft J, Petrangeli S, Wauters T, Huysegems R, Alface PR, Bostoen T, De Turck F (2016) HTTP/2-based adaptive streaming of HEVC video over 4G/LTE networks. IEEE Commun Lett 20(1):2177–2180. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2601087Huang TY, Johari R, McKeown N, Trunnell M, Watson M (2014) A buffer-based approach to rate adaptation: evidence from a large video streaming service. Proc. of the 2014 ACM Conf. On SIGCOMM, Chicago, IL, USA: 187-198. https://doi.org/10.1145/2619239.2626296Institute of Telecommunications and Multimedia Applications website. Look Ahead Demo. Available online at: https://lookahead.iteam.upv.es . Accessed: Jun. (2019)ISO/IEC 23009–1:2014 (2014) Dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (DASH) - Part 1: media presentation description and segment formats.Juluri P, Tamarapalli V, Medhi D (2015) SARA: segment aware rate adaptation algorithm for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. On Commun. Workshop (ICCW), London, UK: 1765-1770. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCW.2015.7247436 .Juluri P, Tamarapalli V, Medhi D (2016) QoE management in DASH systems using the segment aware rate adaptation algorithm. Proc. of the IEEE/IFIP Netw. Oper. And Manag. Symp. (NOMS), Istanbul, Turkey: 129-136. https://doi.org/10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502805 .Kua J, Armitage G, Branch P (2017) A survey of rate adaptation techniques for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP. IEEE Commun Surv & Tutor 19(3):1842–1866. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2685630Lee S, Youn K, Chung K (2015) Adaptive video quality control scheme to improve QoE of MPEG DASH. Proc. of IEEE Int. Conf. On Consum. Electron. (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA: 126-127. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066348 .Li S, Zhang F, Ma L, Ngan K (2011) Image quality assessment by separately evaluating detail losses and additive impairments. IEEE Trans. on Multimed. 13-5:935–949. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2011.2152382Liu C, Bouazizi I, Gabbouj M (2011) Rate adaptation for adaptive HTTP streaming. Proc. of the second annual ACM Conf. On multimed. Syst. (MMSys), San Jose, CA, USA: 169-174. https://doi.org/10.1145/1943552.1943575 .Medium webpage (2016) Toward a practical perceptual video quality metric. Available online at: https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/toward-a-practical-perceptual-video-quality-metric-653f208b9652 . Accessed: Jun. 2019.Mobile Video Service Performance Study (2015) HUAWEI white paper. Available online at: http://www.ctiforum.com/uploadfile/2015/0701/20150701091255294.pdf .Mok RKP, Luo X, Chan EWW, Chang RKC (2012) QDASH: a QoE-aware DASH system. Proc. of multim. Syst. Conf. (MMSys), Chapel Hill, NC, USA: 11-22. https://doi.org/10.1145/2155555.2155558Moldovan C, Hagn K, Sieber C, Kellerer W, Hoßfeld T (2017) Keep calm and don’t switch: about the relationship between switches and quality in HAS. Proc. of the Int. Teletraffic Congr. (ITC), Genoa, Italy: pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.23919/ITC.2017.8065802Müller C, Lederer S, Timmerer C (2012) An evaluation of dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP in vehicular environments. Proc. of the 4th workshop on mob. Video (MoVid), Chapel Hill, NC, USA: 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1145/2151677.2151686Nguyen T, Vu T, Nguyen DV, Ngoc NP, and Thang TC (2015) QoE optimization for adaptive streaming with multiple VBR videos. Proc. of the Int. Conf. On comp., Manag. And Telecommun. (ComManTel), DaNang, Vietnam: 189-193. https://doi.org/10.1109/ComManTel.2015.7394285 .Qin Y, H. Shuai, Pattipati K R, Qian F, Sen S, Wang B, Yue C (2018) ABR Streaming of VBR-encoded videos: characterization, challenges, and solutions. Proc. of ACM CoNext 2018, Heraklion, Greece: 366–378. https://doi.org/10.1145/3281411.3281439 .Samain J, Carofiglio G, Muscariello L, Papalini M, Sardara M, Tortelli M, Rossi D (2017) Dynamic adaptive video streaming: towards a systematic comparison of ICN and TCP/IP. IEEE Trans on Multimed 19(10):2166–2181. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2017.2733340Sheikh H, Bovik A (2006) Image information and visual quality. IEEE Trans on Image Process 15(2):430–444. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2005.859378Shuai Y, Herfet T (2016). A buffer dynamic stabilizer for low-latency adaptive video streaming. Proc. of the Int. Conf. on Consum. Electron., Berlin: 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE-Berlin.2016.7684742 .Tavakoli S, Egger S, Seufert M, Schatz R, Brunnström K, García N (2016) Perceptual quality of HTTP adaptive streaming strategies: cross-experimental analysis of multi-laboratory and crowdsourced subjective studies. IEEE Journal on Select Areas in Commun 34-8:2141–2153. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2016.2577361Yarnagula H K, Juluri P, Mehr S K, Tamarapalli V, Medhi D (2019) QoE for Mobile clients with segment-aware rate adaptation algorithm (SARA) for DASH video streaming. ACM trans. On multimed. Comput., Commun., and Appl. (TOMM) 15(2):article no. 36 https://doi.org/10.1145/3311749 .Yin X, Sekar V, Sinopoli B (2014) Toward a principled framework to design dynamic adaptive streaming algorithms over HTTP. Proc. of the 13th ACM workshop on hot topics in Netw. (HotNets), Los Angeles, CA, USA: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2670518.2673877 .YouTube webpage (2019) Youtube press. Available online at: https://www.youtube.com/yt/about/press . Accessed: Jun. 2019.Youtube webpage, Google I/O ‘18: Building feature-rich media apps with ExoPlayer. Available online at: https://youtu.be/svdq1BWl4r8?t=2m . Published: May (2018)Yu L, Tillo T, Xiao J (2017) QoE-driven dynamic adaptive video streaming strategy with future information. IEEE Trans on Broadcast 63-3:523–534. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBC.2017.2687698Zhao S, Li Z, Medhi D, Lai P, Liu S (2017) Study of user QoE improvement for dynamic adaptive streaming over HTTP (MPEG-DASH). Proc. of the Int. Conf. On Comput., network. And Commun. (ICNC): multimed. Comput. And Commun., Santa Clara, CA, USA: 566-570. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCNC.2017.7876191 .Zhou Y, Duan Y, Sun J, Guo Z (2014) Towards a simple and smooth rate adaption for VBR video in DASH. Proc. of the IEEE Vis. Commun. and Image Process. Conf, Valletta, pp 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1109/VCIP.2014.7051491Zhou C, Lin C-W, Guo Z (2016) mDASH: a Markov decision-based rate adaptation approach for dynamic HTTP streaming. IEEE Trans. on Multimed 18(4):738–751. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMM.2016.252265

    Understanding user experience of mobile video: Framework, measurement, and optimization

    Get PDF
    Since users have become the focus of product/service design in last decade, the term User eXperience (UX) has been frequently used in the field of Human-Computer-Interaction (HCI). Research on UX facilitates a better understanding of the various aspects of the user’s interaction with the product or service. Mobile video, as a new and promising service and research field, has attracted great attention. Due to the significance of UX in the success of mobile video (Jordan, 2002), many researchers have centered on this area, examining users’ expectations, motivations, requirements, and usage context. As a result, many influencing factors have been explored (Buchinger, Kriglstein, Brandt & Hlavacs, 2011; Buchinger, Kriglstein & Hlavacs, 2009). However, a general framework for specific mobile video service is lacking for structuring such a great number of factors. To measure user experience of multimedia services such as mobile video, quality of experience (QoE) has recently become a prominent concept. In contrast to the traditionally used concept quality of service (QoS), QoE not only involves objectively measuring the delivered service but also takes into account user’s needs and desires when using the service, emphasizing the user’s overall acceptability on the service. Many QoE metrics are able to estimate the user perceived quality or acceptability of mobile video, but may be not enough accurate for the overall UX prediction due to the complexity of UX. Only a few frameworks of QoE have addressed more aspects of UX for mobile multimedia applications but need be transformed into practical measures. The challenge of optimizing UX remains adaptations to the resource constrains (e.g., network conditions, mobile device capabilities, and heterogeneous usage contexts) as well as meeting complicated user requirements (e.g., usage purposes and personal preferences). In this chapter, we investigate the existing important UX frameworks, compare their similarities and discuss some important features that fit in the mobile video service. Based on the previous research, we propose a simple UX framework for mobile video application by mapping a variety of influencing factors of UX upon a typical mobile video delivery system. Each component and its factors are explored with comprehensive literature reviews. The proposed framework may benefit in user-centred design of mobile video through taking a complete consideration of UX influences and in improvement of mobile videoservice quality by adjusting the values of certain factors to produce a positive user experience. It may also facilitate relative research in the way of locating important issues to study, clarifying research scopes, and setting up proper study procedures. We then review a great deal of research on UX measurement, including QoE metrics and QoE frameworks of mobile multimedia. Finally, we discuss how to achieve an optimal quality of user experience by focusing on the issues of various aspects of UX of mobile video. In the conclusion, we suggest some open issues for future study

    Video streaming

    Get PDF

    Cognition-Based Networks: A New Perspective on Network Optimization Using Learning and Distributed Intelligence

    Get PDF
    IEEE Access Volume 3, 2015, Article number 7217798, Pages 1512-1530 Open Access Cognition-based networks: A new perspective on network optimization using learning and distributed intelligence (Article) Zorzi, M.a , Zanella, A.a, Testolin, A.b, De Filippo De Grazia, M.b, Zorzi, M.bc a Department of Information Engineering, University of Padua, Padua, Italy b Department of General Psychology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy c IRCCS San Camillo Foundation, Venice-Lido, Italy View additional affiliations View references (107) Abstract In response to the new challenges in the design and operation of communication networks, and taking inspiration from how living beings deal with complexity and scalability, in this paper we introduce an innovative system concept called COgnition-BAsed NETworkS (COBANETS). The proposed approach develops around the systematic application of advanced machine learning techniques and, in particular, unsupervised deep learning and probabilistic generative models for system-wide learning, modeling, optimization, and data representation. Moreover, in COBANETS, we propose to combine this learning architecture with the emerging network virtualization paradigms, which make it possible to actuate automatic optimization and reconfiguration strategies at the system level, thus fully unleashing the potential of the learning approach. Compared with the past and current research efforts in this area, the technical approach outlined in this paper is deeply interdisciplinary and more comprehensive, calling for the synergic combination of expertise of computer scientists, communications and networking engineers, and cognitive scientists, with the ultimate aim of breaking new ground through a profound rethinking of how the modern understanding of cognition can be used in the management and optimization of telecommunication network

    Survey on QoE/QoS Correlation Models for Video Streaming over Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks

    Get PDF
    Vehicular Ad-hoc Networks (VANETs) are a new emerging technology which has attracted enormous interest over the last few years. It enables vehicles to communicate with each other and with roadside infrastructures for many applications. One of the promising applications is multimedia services for traffic safety or infotainment. The video service requires a good quality to satisfy the end-user known as the Quality of Experience (QoE). Several models have been suggested in the literature to measure or predict this metric. In this paper, we present an overview of interesting researches, which propose QoE models for video streaming over VANETs. The limits and deficiencies of these models are identified, which shed light on the challenges and real problems to overcome in the future

    Quality of experience-centric management of adaptive video streaming services : status and challenges

    Get PDF
    Video streaming applications currently dominate Internet traffic. Particularly, HTTP Adaptive Streaming ( HAS) has emerged as the dominant standard for streaming videos over the best-effort Internet, thanks to its capability of matching the video quality to the available network resources. In HAS, the video client is equipped with a heuristic that dynamically decides the most suitable quality to stream the content, based on information such as the perceived network bandwidth or the video player buffer status. The goal of this heuristic is to optimize the quality as perceived by the user, the so-called Quality of Experience (QoE). Despite the many advantages brought by the adaptive streaming principle, optimizing users' QoE is far from trivial. Current heuristics are still suboptimal when sudden bandwidth drops occur, especially in wireless environments, thus leading to freezes in the video playout, the main factor influencing users' QoE. This issue is aggravated in case of live events, where the player buffer has to be kept as small as possible in order to reduce the playout delay between the user and the live signal. In light of the above, in recent years, several works have been proposed with the aim of extending the classical purely client-based structure of adaptive video streaming, in order to fully optimize users' QoE. In this article, a survey is presented of research works on this topic together with a classification based on where the optimization takes place. This classification goes beyond client-based heuristics to investigate the usage of server-and network-assisted architectures and of new application and transport layer protocols. In addition, we outline the major challenges currently arising in the field of multimedia delivery, which are going to be of extreme relevance in future years
    corecore