Property Testing via Set-Theoretic Operations

Given two testable properties $\mathcal{P}_{1}$ and $\mathcal{P}_{2}$, under what conditions are the union, intersection or set-difference of these two properties also testable? We initiate a systematic study of these basic set-theoretic operations in the context of property testing. As an application, we give a conceptually different proof that linearity is testable, albeit with much worse query complexity. Furthermore, for the problem of testing disjunction of linear functions, which was previously known to be one-sided testable with a super-polynomial query complexity, we give an improved analysis and show it has query complexity O(1/\eps^2), where \eps is the distance parameter.Comment: Appears in ICS 201

Property Testing via Set-Theoretic Operations

Given two testable properties P1 and P2, under what conditions are the union, intersection or set-difference of these two properties also testable? We initiate a systematic study of these basic set-theoretic operations in the context of property testing. As an application, we give a conceptually different proof that linearity is testable, albeit with much worse query complexity. Furthermore, for the problem of testing disjunction of linear functions, which was previously known to be one-sided testable with a super-polynomial query complexity, we give an improved analysis and show it has query complexity O(1/ε2), where ε is the distance parameter.National Science Foundation (U.S.) (NSF Award CCR-0514915

Approximate Judgement Aggregation

In this paper we analyze judgement aggregation problems in which a group of agents independently votes on a set of complex propositions that has some interdependency constraint between them (e.g., transitivity when describing preferences). We consider the issue of judgement aggregation from the perspective of approximation. That is, we generalize the previous results by studying approximate judgement aggregation. We relax the main two constraints assumed in the current literature, Consistency and Independence and consider mechanisms that only approximately satisfy these constraints, that is, satisfy them up to a small portion of the inputs. The main question we raise is whether the relaxation of these notions significantly alters the class of satisfying aggregation mechanisms. The recent works for preference aggregation of Kalai, Mossel, and Keller fit into this framework. The main result of this paper is that, as in the case of preference aggregation, in the case of a subclass of a natural class of aggregation problems termed `truth-functional agendas', the set of satisfying aggregation mechanisms does not extend non-trivially when relaxing the constraints. Our proof techniques involve Boolean Fourier transform and analysis of voter influences for voting protocols. The question we raise for Approximate Aggregation can be stated in terms of Property Testing. For instance, as a corollary from our result we get a generalization of the classic result for property testing of linearity of Boolean functions.judgement aggregation, truth-functional agendas, computational social choice, computational judgement aggregation, approximate aggregation, inconsistency index, dependency index

Some closure features of locally testable affine-invariant properties

Thesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.Includes bibliographical references (p. 31-32).We prove that the class of locally testable affine-invariant properties is closed under sums, intersections and "lifts". The sum and intersection are two natural operations on linear spaces of functions, where the sum of two properties is simply their sum as a vector space. The "lift" is a less well-studied property, which creates some interesting affine-invariant properties over large domains, from properties over smaller domains. Previously such results were known for "single-orbit characterized" affine-invariant properties, which are known to be a subclass of locally testable ones, and are potentially a strict subclass. The fact that the intersection of locally-testable affine-invariant properties are locally testable could have been derived from previously known general results on closure of property testing under set-theoretic operations, but was not explicitly observed before. The closure under sum and lifts is implied by an affirmative answer to a central question attempting to characterize locally testable affine-invariant properties, but the status of that question remains wide open. Affine-invariant properties are clean abstractions of commonly studied, and extensively used, algebraic properties such linearity and low-degree. Thus far it is not known what makes affine-invariant properties locally testable - no characterizations are known, and till this work it was not clear if they satisfied any closure properties. This work shows that the class of locally testable affine-invariant properties are closed under some very natural operations. Our techniques use ones previously developed for the study of "single-orbit characterized" properties, but manage to apply them to the potentially more general class of all locally testable ones via a simple connection that may be of broad interest in the study of affine-invariant properties.by Alan Xinyu Guo.S.M

Property Testing via Set-Theoretic Operations

Given two testable properties P1 and P2, under what conditions are the union, intersection or set-difference of these two properties also testable? We initiate a systematic study of these basic set-theoretic operations in the context of property testing. As an application, we give a conceptually different proof that linearity is testable, albeit with much worse query complexity. Furthermore, for the problem of testing disjunction of linear functions, which was previously known to be one-sided testable with a super-polynomial query complexity, we give an improved analysis and show it has query complexity O(1/ɛ 2), where ɛ is the distance parameter