216 Jewish Hospital of St. Louis

https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/bjc_216/1116/thumbnail.jp

The Postman Always Rings Twice, February 24-27, 2011

This is the concert program of The Postman Always Rings Twice performance on Thursday - Sunday, February 24 - 27, 2011 at 8:00 p.m., at the Boston University Theater, 264 Huntington Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts. The work performed was The Postman Always Rings Twice by Stephen Paulus. Digitization for Boston University Concert Programs was supported by the Boston University Center for the Humanities Library Endowed Fund

On the Concept of Snowball Sampling

This brief comment reflects on the historical and current uses of the term "snowball sampling."Comment: 5 pages, 0 figures. To appear in Sociological Methodolog

Focal Spot, Winter 1974

https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/focal_spot_archives/1010/thumbnail.jp

User Education in Academic Libraries: A Century in Retrospect

published or submitted for publicatio

Fourth Amendment Codification and Professor Kerr\u27s Misguided Call for Judicial Deference

This essay critiques Professor Orin Kerr\u27s provocative article, The Fourth Amendment and New Technologies: Constitutional Myths and the Case for Caution, 102 Mich. L. Rev. 801 (2004). Increasingly, Fourth Amendment protection is receding from a litany of law enforcement activities, and it is being replaced by federal statutes. Kerr notes these developments and argues that courts should place a thumb on the scale in favor of judicial caution when technology is in flux, and should consider allowing legislatures to provide the primary rules governing law enforcement investigations involving new technologies. Kerr\u27s key contentions are that (1) legislatures create rules that are more comprehensive, balanced, clear, and flexible; (2) legislatures are better able to keep up with technological change; and (3) legislatures are more adept at understanding complex new technologies. I take issue with each of these arguments. Regarding Kerr\u27s first contention, I argue that Congress has created an uneven fabric of protections that is riddled with holes and weak safeguards. Kerr\u27s second contention - that legislatures are better able to update rules quickly as technology shifts - is belied by the historical record, which suggests Congress is actually far worse than the courts in reacting to new technologies. As for Kerr\u27s third contention, shifting to a statutory regime will not eliminate Kerr\u27s concern with judges misunderstanding technology. In fact, many judicial misunderstandings stem from courts trying to fit new technologies into an old statutory regime that is built around old technologies. Therefore, while Kerr is right that our attention must focus more on the statutes, he is wrong in urging for a deferential judicial approach to the Fourth Amendment

Making the Most of United States v. Jones in a Surveillance Society: A Statutory Implementation of Mosaic Theory

article published in law journalIn the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. Jones, a majority of the Justices appeared to recognize that under some circumstances aggregation of information about an individual through governmental surveillance can amount to a Fourth Amendment search. If adopted by the Court, this notion sometimes called "mosaic theory"-could bring about a radical change to Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, not just in connection with surveillance of public movements-the issue raised in Jonesbut also with respect to the government's increasingly pervasive record-mining efforts. One reason the Court might avoid the mosaic theory is the perceived difficulty of implementing it. This article provides, in the guise of a model statute, a means of doing so. More specifically, this article explains how proportionality reasoning and political process theory can provide concrete guidance for the courts and police in connection with physical and data surveillance

216 Jewish Hospital of St. Louis

https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/bjc_216/1020/thumbnail.jp