Coinductive Formal Reasoning in Exact Real Arithmetic

In this article we present a method for formally proving the correctness of the lazy algorithms for computing homographic and quadratic transformations -- of which field operations are special cases-- on a representation of real numbers by coinductive streams. The algorithms work on coinductive stream of M\"{o}bius maps and form the basis of the Edalat--Potts exact real arithmetic. We use the machinery of the Coq proof assistant for the coinductive types to present the formalisation. The formalised algorithms are only partially productive, i.e., they do not output provably infinite streams for all possible inputs. We show how to deal with this partiality in the presence of syntactic restrictions posed by the constructive type theory of Coq. Furthermore we show that the type theoretic techniques that we develop are compatible with the semantics of the algorithms as continuous maps on real numbers. The resulting Coq formalisation is available for public download.Comment: 40 page

Inductive and Coinductive Components of Corecursive Functions in Coq

In Constructive Type Theory, recursive and corecursive definitions are subject to syntactic restrictions which guarantee termination for recursive functions and productivity for corecursive functions. However, many terminating and productive functions do not pass the syntactic tests. Bove proposed in her thesis an elegant reformulation of the method of accessibility predicates that widens the range of terminative recursive functions formalisable in Constructive Type Theory. In this paper, we pursue the same goal for productive corecursive functions. Notably, our method of formalisation of coinductive definitions of productive functions in Coq requires not only the use of ad-hoc predicates, but also a systematic algorithm that separates the inductive and coinductive parts of functions.Comment: Dans Coalgebraic Methods in Computer Science (2008

Représentation coinductive des graphes

Nous nous intéressons à la représentation de graphes dans le prouveur Coq. Nous avons choisi de les représenter par des types coinductifs dont nous voulions explorer l'utilisation. Ceux-ci permettent de rendre succincte et élégante la représentation et d'obtenir la navigabilité par construction. Nous avons dû contourner la condition de garde dont le but est d'assurer la validité des opérations effectuées sur les objets coinductifs. Son implantation dans Coq est restrictive et interdit parfois des définitions sémantiquement correctes. Une formalisation canonique des graphes dépasse ainsi l'expressivité directe de Coq. Nous avons donc proposé une solution respectant ces limitations, puis nous avons défini une relation sur les graphes nous permettant d'obtenir la même notion d'équivalence qu'avec une représentation classique tout en gardant les avantages de la coinduction. Nous montrons qu'elle est équivalente à une relation basée sur des observations finies.We are interested in graph representation in the theorem prover Coq. We have chosen to represent graphs using coinductive types. We wanted to explore their use in Coq. Indeed, they make the graph representation succinct and elegant. Moreover, navigability is ensured by construction. We had to overcome the guardedness condition whose objective is to ensure validity of all operations made on coinductive objects. Its implementation in Coq is restrictive and sometimes forbids definitions, even semantically correct ones. A canonical formalization of graphs thus surmounts Coq's direct expressivity. We have designed a solution respecting these limitations. Then, we have defined a relation on graphs close to the notion of equivalence obtained on a classical representation, keeping however the advantages offered by coinduction. We show that this relation is equivalent to another one based on finite observations of the graphs