Surface and Contextual Linguistic Cues in Dialog Act Classification: A Cognitive Science View

What role do linguistic cues on a surface and contextual level have in identifying the intention behind an utterance? Drawing on the wealth of studies and corpora from the computational task of dialog act classification, we studied this question from a cognitive science perspective. We first reviewed the role of linguistic cues in dialog act classification studies that evaluated model performance on three of the most commonly used English dialog act corpora. Findings show that frequency‐based, machine learning, and deep learning methods all yield similar performance. Classification accuracies, moreover, generally do not explain which specific cues yield high performance. Using a cognitive science approach, in two analyses, we systematically investigated the role of cues in the surface structure of the utterance and cues of the surrounding context individually and combined. By comparing the explained variance, rather than the prediction accuracy of these cues in a logistic regression model, we found that (1) while surface and contextual linguistic cues can complement each other, surface linguistic cues form the backbone in human dialog act identification, (2) with word frequency statistics being particularly important for the dialog act, and (3) the similar trends across corpora, despite differences in the type of dialog, corpus setup, and dialog act tagset. The importance of surface linguistic cues in dialog act classification sheds light on how both computers and humans take advantage of these cues in speech act recognition

딥러닝 기반 생성 모델을 이용한 자연어처리 데이터 증강 기법

학위논문(박사)--서울대학교 대학원 :공과대학 컴퓨터공학부,2020. 2. 이상구.Recent advances in generation capability of deep learning models have spurred interest in utilizing deep generative models for unsupervised generative data augmentation (GDA). Generative data augmentation aims to improve the performance of a downstream machine learning model by augmenting the original dataset with samples generated from a deep latent variable model. This data augmentation approach is attractive to the natural language processing community, because (1) there is a shortage of text augmentation techniques that require little supervision and (2) resource scarcity being prevalent. In this dissertation, we explore the feasibility of exploiting deep latent variable models for data augmentation on three NLP tasks: sentence classification, spoken language understanding (SLU) and dialogue state tracking (DST), represent NLP tasks of various complexities and properties -- SLU requires multi-task learning of text classification and sequence tagging, while DST requires the understanding of hierarchical and recurrent data structures. For each of the three tasks, we propose a task-specific latent variable model based on conditional, hierarchical and sequential variational autoencoders (VAE) for multi-modal joint modeling of linguistic features and the relevant annotations. We conduct extensive experiments to statistically justify our hypothesis that deep generative data augmentation is beneficial for all subject tasks. Our experiments show that deep generative data augmentation is effective for the select tasks, supporting the idea that the technique can potentially be utilized for other range of NLP tasks. Ablation and qualitative studies reveal deeper insight into the underlying mechanisms of generative data augmentation. As a secondary contribution, we also shed light onto the recurring posterior collapse phenomenon in autoregressive VAEs and, subsequently, propose novel techniques to reduce the model risk, which is crucial for proper training of complex VAE models, enabling them to synthesize better samples for data augmentation. In summary, this work intends to demonstrate and analyze the effectiveness of unsupervised generative data augmentation in NLP. Ultimately, our approach enables standardized adoption of generative data augmentation, which can be applied orthogonally to existing regularization techniques.최근 딥러닝 기반 생성 모델의 급격한 발전으로 이를 이용한 생성 기반 데이터 증강 기법(generative data augmentation, GDA)의 실현 가능성에 대한 기대가 커지고 있다. 생성 기반 데이터 증강 기법은 딥러닝 기반 잠재변수 모델에서 생성 된 샘플을 원본 데이터셋에 추가하여 연관된 태스크의 성능을 향상시키는 기술을 의미한다. 따라서 생성 기반 데이터 증강 기법은 데이터 공간에서 이뤄지는 정규화 기술의 한 형태로 간주될 수 있다. 이러한 딥러닝 기반 생성 모델의 새로운 활용 가능성은 자연어처리 분야에서 더욱 중요하게 부각되는 이유는 (1) 범용 가능한 텍스트 데이터 증강 기술의 부재와 (2) 텍스트 데이터의 희소성을 극복할 수 있는 대안이 필요하기 때문이다. 문제의 복잡도와 특징을 골고루 채집하기 위해 본 논문에서는 텍스트 분류(text classification), 순차적 레이블링과 멀티태스킹 기술이 필요한 발화 이해(spoken language understanding, SLU), 계층적이며 재귀적인 데이터 구조에 대한 고려가 필요한 대화 상태 추적(dialogue state tracking, DST) 등 세 가지 문제에서 딥러닝 기반 생성 모델을 활용한 데이터 증강 기법의 타당성에 대해 다룬다. 본 연구에서는 조건부, 계층적 및 순차적 variational autoencoder (VAE)에 기반하여 각 자연어처리 문제에 특화된 텍스트 및 연관 부착 정보를 동시에 생성하는 특수 딥러닝 생성 모델들을 제시하고, 다양한 하류 모델과 데이터셋을 다루는 등 폭 넓은 실험을 통해 딥 생성 모델 기반 데이터 증강 기법의 효과를 통계적으로 입증하였다. 부수적 연구에서는 자기회귀적(autoregressive) VAE에서 빈번히 발생하는 posterior collapse 문제에 대해 탐구하고, 해당 문제를 완화할 수 있는 신규 방안도 제안한다. 해당 방법을 생성적 데이터 증강에 필요한 복잡한 VAE 모델에 적용하였을 때, 생성 모델의 생성 질이 향상되어 데이터 증강 효과에도 긍정적인 영향을 미칠 수 있음을 검증하였다. 본 논문을 통해 자연어처리 분야에서 기존 정규화 기법과 병행 적용 가능한 비지도 형태의 데이터 증강 기법의 표준화를 기대해 볼 수 있다.1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation 1 1.2 Dissertation Overview 6 2 Background and Related Work 8 2.1 Deep Latent Variable Models 8 2.1.1 Variational Autoencoder (VAE) 10 2.1.2 Deep Generative Models and Text Generation 12 2.2 Data Augmentation 12 2.2.1 General Description 13 2.2.2 Categorization of Data Augmentation 14 2.2.3 Theoretical Explanations 21 2.3 Summary 24 3 Basic Task: Text Classi cation 25 3.1 Introduction 25 3.2 Our Approach 28 3.2.1 Proposed Models 28 3.2.2 Training with I-VAE 29 3.3 Experiments 31 3.3.1 Datasets 32 3.3.2 Experimental Settings 33 3.3.3 Implementation Details 34 3.3.4 Data Augmentation Results 36 3.3.5 Ablation Studies 39 3.3.6 Qualitative Analysis 40 3.4 Summary 45 4 Multi-task Learning: Spoken Language Understanding 46 4.1 Introduction 46 4.2 Related Work 48 4.3 Model Description 48 4.3.1 Framework Formulation 48 4.3.2 Joint Generative Model 49 4.4 Experiments 56 4.4.1 Datasets 56 4.4.2 Experimental Settings 57 4.4.3 Generative Data Augmentation Results 61 4.4.4 Comparison to Other State-of-the-art Results 63 4.4.5 Ablation Studies 63 4.5 Summary 67 5 Complex Data: Dialogue State Tracking 68 5.1 Introduction 68 5.2 Background and Related Work 70 5.2.1 Task-oriented Dialogue 70 5.2.2 Dialogue State Tracking 72 5.2.3 Conversation Modeling 72 5.3 Variational Hierarchical Dialogue Autoencoder (VHDA) 73 5.3.1 Notations 73 5.3.2 Variational Hierarchical Conversational RNN 74 5.3.3 Proposed Model 75 5.3.4 Posterior Collapse 82 5.4 Experimental Results 84 5.4.1 Experimental Settings 84 5.4.2 Data Augmentation Results 90 5.4.3 Intrinsic Evaluation - Language Evaluation 94 5.4.4 Qualitative Results 95 5.5 Summary 101 6 Conclusion 103 6.1 Summary 103 6.2 Limitations 104 6.3 Future Work 105Docto

Lambek vs. Lambek: Functorial Vector Space Semantics and String Diagrams for Lambek Calculus

The Distributional Compositional Categorical (DisCoCat) model is a mathematical framework that provides compositional semantics for meanings of natural language sentences. It consists of a computational procedure for constructing meanings of sentences, given their grammatical structure in terms of compositional type-logic, and given the empirically derived meanings of their words. For the particular case that the meaning of words is modelled within a distributional vector space model, its experimental predictions, derived from real large scale data, have outperformed other empirically validated methods that could build vectors for a full sentence. This success can be attributed to a conceptually motivated mathematical underpinning, by integrating qualitative compositional type-logic and quantitative modelling of meaning within a category-theoretic mathematical framework. The type-logic used in the DisCoCat model is Lambek's pregroup grammar. Pregroup types form a posetal compact closed category, which can be passed, in a functorial manner, on to the compact closed structure of vector spaces, linear maps and tensor product. The diagrammatic versions of the equational reasoning in compact closed categories can be interpreted as the flow of word meanings within sentences. Pregroups simplify Lambek's previous type-logic, the Lambek calculus, which has been extensively used to formalise and reason about various linguistic phenomena. The apparent reliance of the DisCoCat on pregroups has been seen as a shortcoming. This paper addresses this concern, by pointing out that one may as well realise a functorial passage from the original type-logic of Lambek, a monoidal bi-closed category, to vector spaces, or to any other model of meaning organised within a monoidal bi-closed category. The corresponding string diagram calculus, due to Baez and Stay, now depicts the flow of word meanings.Comment: 29 pages, pending publication in Annals of Pure and Applied Logi

Know Thy Strengths: Comprehensive Dialogue State Tracking Diagnostics

Recent works that revealed the vulnerability of dialogue state tracking (DST) models to distributional shifts have made holistic comparisons on robustness and qualitative analyses increasingly important for understanding their relative performance. We present our findings from standardized and comprehensive DST diagnoses, which have previously been sparse and uncoordinated, using our toolkit, CheckDST, a collection of robustness tests and failure mode analytics. We discover that different classes of DST models have clear strengths and weaknesses, where generation models are more promising for handling language variety while span-based classification models are more robust to unseen entities. Prompted by this discovery, we also compare checkpoints from the same model and find that the standard practice of selecting checkpoints using validation loss/accuracy is prone to overfitting and each model class has distinct patterns of failure. Lastly, we demonstrate how our diagnoses motivate a pre-finetuning procedure with non-dialogue data that offers comprehensive improvements to generation models by alleviating the impact of distributional shifts through transfer learning.Comment: EMNLP202

City versus Countryside: Environmental Equity in Context

This Article takes an approach to the problem of environmental equity that is different from the remedies advocated by the leaders of the environmental equity movement. The plea that the benefits of environmental protection be extended to all groups in society is, of course, a legitimate one, but the movement is too narrowly focused and its aims are too modest. I dissent from the two central premises held by environmental equity advocates. First, the movement assumes that judicially recognized and enforced rights will lead to improved public health. Second, the movement asserts that disadvantaged communities should adopt a “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) strategy. In contrast, I argue that the current focus of the environmental equity movement, important as it is, is too narrow because the legal strategy of the civil rights movement is largely inapplicable to environmental issues. Environmental protection is not a rights-based movement. Thus, the judiciary’s role in promoting environmental quality is limited compared to its role in promoting racial justice through the recognition and enforcement of constitutionally-based civil rights. In addition, I argue that the NIMBY strategy is equally shortsighted. Environmental equity takes current environmental protection strategies as a given at a time when the science and ethics of environmental protection are undergoing a profound re-evaluation

City versus Countryside: Environmental Equity in Context

This Article takes an approach to the problem of environmental equity that is different from the remedies advocated by the leaders of the environmental equity movement. The plea that the benefits of environmental protection be extended to all groups in society is, of course, a legitimate one, but the movement is too narrowly focused and its aims are too modest. I dissent from the two central premises held by environmental equity advocates. First, the movement assumes that judicially recognized and enforced rights will lead to improved public health. Second, the movement asserts that disadvantaged communities should adopt a “Not in My Backyard” (NIMBY) strategy. In contrast, I argue that the current focus of the environmental equity movement, important as it is, is too narrow because the legal strategy of the civil rights movement is largely inapplicable to environmental issues. Environmental protection is not a rights-based movement. Thus, the judiciary’s role in promoting environmental quality is limited compared to its role in promoting racial justice through the recognition and enforcement of constitutionally-based civil rights. In addition, I argue that the NIMBY strategy is equally shortsighted. Environmental equity takes current environmental protection strategies as a given at a time when the science and ethics of environmental protection are undergoing a profound re-evaluation

Revitalizing Multilateral Governance at the World Trade Organization Report of the High-Level Board of Experts on the Future of Global Trade Governance. Bertelsmann Policy Brief 2018

If international trade is not governed by rules, mere might dictates what is right. The World Trade Organization (WTO) serves as a place where trade policy issues are addressed, disputes arbitrated, legal frameworks derived and enforced. Through these functions, the WTO ensures that the rules of trade policy are inspired by fairness and reciprocity rather than national interest. It is more important than ever to vitalize the global public good that it rep-resents against various threats that have been undermining it. Therefore, the Global Economic Dynamics project of the Bertelsmann Stiftung has called into life a High-Level Board of Experts on the Future of Global Trade Governance. Composed of eminent experts and seasoned trade diplomats, it elaborated a series of feasible policy recommendations that will increase the effectiveness and sali-ence of the WTO. We hope that this Report provides helpful suggestions in a time marked by increasing trade disputes and protectionism and instead contributes to stronger multilateral institutions and fora.1 The Bertelsmann Stiftung owes a debt of gratitude to Prof Bernard Hoekman, the Chairman of the Expert Board and author of this report. His invaluable expertise and experience, guidance and ability to bridge controversial opinions have been crucial in defining the work of the Board. We would also like to express our sincere thanks to all our Board Members, who generously contributed their expertise, time and networks. Without their dedication, this Report would not have been possible. Finally, we would like to thank Robert Koopman and Aik Hoe Lim of the WTO for their support throughout the whole process and Christian Bluth of Bertelsmann Stiftung for managing this common endeavour