Validation of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determination of cup orientation after THA

Purpose: The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy and reproducibility of a statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction method for determining cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty. With a statistical shape model, this method allows reconstructing a patient-specific 3D-model of the pelvis from a standard AP X-ray radiograph. Cup orientation (inclination and anteversion) is then calculated with respect to the anterior pelvic plane that is derived from the reconstructed model. Materials and methods: The validation study was conducted retrospectively on datasets of 29 patients (31 hips). Among them, there were 15 men (15 hips) and 14 women (16 hips). The average age of the patients was 69.4±8.5(49−82) years. Each dataset has one postoperative X-ray radiograph and one postoperative CT scan. The postoperative CT scan for each patient was used to establish the ground truth for the cup orientation. The cup anteversion and inclination that were calculated from the 2D/3D reconstruction method were compared to the associated ground truth. To validate reproducibility and reliability, two observers performed measurements for each dataset twice in order to measure the reproducibility and the reliability of the 2D/3D reconstruction method. Results: Our validation study demonstrated a mean accuracy of 0.4 ± 1.8°(−2.6° to 3.3°) for inclination and a mean accuracy of 0.6±1.5°(−2.0° to 3.9°) for anteversion. Through the Bland-Altman analysis, no systematic errors in accuracy were detected. The method showed very good consistency for both parameters. Conclusions: Our validation results demonstrate that the statistical shape model-based 2D/3D reconstruction-based method is an accurate, consistent, and reproducible technique to measure cup orientation from postoperative X-ray radiographs. The best results were achieved with radiographs including the bilateral anterior superior iliac spines and the cranial part of non-fractured pelvise

Assessing the Accuracy Factors in the Determination of Postoperative Acetabular Cup Orientation Using Hybrid 2D-3D Registration

Single standard anteroposterior radiograph-based methods for measuring cup orientation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) are subject to substantial errors if the individual pelvic orientation with respect to X-ray plate is not taken into consideration. Previously, we proposed to use a hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme to determine the postoperative acetabular cup orientation and developed an object-oriented cross-program called "HipMatch.” However, its accuracy and robustness have not been fully investigated. To assess the potential factors that may affect the accuracy and robustness of the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme in determining the postoperative acetabular cup orientation, a comprehensive validation study using a cadaver pelvis was performed. Nine X-ray radiographs taken from different pelvic positions relative to the X-ray plate and two computed tomography volumes of the pelvis with one acquired before the cup implantation and the other acquired after the cup implantation were used in the validation study. Potential factors that may affect the accuracy and robustness of the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme were experimentally determined. Our experimental results demonstrate that (1) the plain radiograph-based method is not accurate; (2) the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme helps to improve the estimation accuracy; (3) the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme can robustly and accurately estimate the cup orientation even when a big portion of the radiograph is occluded; and (4) image resolution has minor effect on the estimation accuracy. The hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme is an accurate and robust method to measure exact cup orientation in THA. It holds the promise to be a valuable tool for clinical routine usage for providing evidence-based informatio

An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

Background Inadequate acetabular component orientation is associated with postoperative impingement, dislocation, and accelerated polyethylene wear. Computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems provide accuracy for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but are not available in all facilities. Accelerometer-based navigation systems are inexpensive, but their accuracy remains undetermined. This study compares the accuracy of cup orientation in THA using CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems. Methods This retrospective study included 35 consecutive patients (11 males, 24 females; mean age, 65 years) who underwent primary cementless THA via an anterolateral approach in the supine position. Both CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems were used simultaneously. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between the two systems using postoperative CT. Results The accuracy of cup inclination was 2.7° ± 2.0° in the CT-based group and 3.3° ± 2.4° in the accelerometer-based group. The accuracy of cup anteversion was 2.8° ± 2.6° in the CT-based group and 3.4° ± 2.2° in the accelerometer-based group. No significant difference was observed in cup inclination (p = 0.29) or cup anteversion (p = 0.34) between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation. Conclusions The accuracy of cup positioning did not differ significantly between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems

An accelerometer-based navigation system provides acetabular cup orientation accuracy comparable to that of computed tomography-based navigation during total hip arthroplasty in the supine position

Background Inadequate acetabular component orientation is associated with postoperative impingement, dislocation, and accelerated polyethylene wear. Computed tomography (CT)-based navigation systems provide accuracy for total hip arthroplasty (THA) but are not available in all facilities. Accelerometer-based navigation systems are inexpensive, but their accuracy remains undetermined. This study compares the accuracy of cup orientation in THA using CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems. Methods This retrospective study included 35 consecutive patients (11 males, 24 females; mean age, 65 years) who underwent primary cementless THA via an anterolateral approach in the supine position. Both CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems were used simultaneously. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between the two systems using postoperative CT. Results The accuracy of cup inclination was 2.7° ± 2.0° in the CT-based group and 3.3° ± 2.4° in the accelerometer-based group. The accuracy of cup anteversion was 2.8° ± 2.6° in the CT-based group and 3.4° ± 2.2° in the accelerometer-based group. No significant difference was observed in cup inclination (p = 0.29) or cup anteversion (p = 0.34) between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation. Conclusions The accuracy of cup positioning did not differ significantly between CT-based and accelerometer-based navigation systems

Computer assisted determination of acetabular cup orientation using 2D-3D image registration

Background: 2D-3D image-based registration methods have been developed to measure acetabular cup orientation after total hip arthroplasty (THA). These methods require registration of both the prosthesis and the CT images to 2D radiographs and compute implant position with respect to a reference. The application of these methods is limited in clinical practice due to two limitations: (1) the requirement of a computer-aided design (CAD) model of the prosthesis, which may be unavailable due to the proprietary concerns of the manufacturer, and (2) the requirement of either multiple radiographs or radiograph-specific calibration, usually unavailable for retrospective studies. In this paper, we propose a new method to address these limitations. Methods: A new formulation for determination of post-operative cup orientation, which couples a radiographic measurement with 2D-3D image matching, was developed. In our formulation, the radiographic measurement can be obtained with known methods so that the challenge lies in the 2D-3D image matching. To solve this problem, a hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme combining a landmark-to-ray 2D-3D alignment with a robust intensity-based 2D-3D registration was used. The hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme allows computing both the post-operative cup orientation with respect to an anatomical reference and the pelvic tilt and rotation with respect to the X-ray imaging table/plate. The method was validated using 2D adult cadaver hips. Results: Using the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme, our method showed a mean accuracy of 1.0 ± 0.7° (range from 0.1°to2.0°) for inclination and 1.7 ± 1.2° (range from 0.0° to 3.9°) for anteversion, taking the measurements from post-operative CT images as ground truths. Conclusions: Our new solution formulation and the hybrid 2D-3D registration scheme facilitate estimation of post-operative cup orientation and measurement of pelvic tilt and rotatio

Minimally invasive computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty, following the concept of femur first and combined anteversion: design of a blinded randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Impingement can be a serious complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA), and is one of the major causes of postoperative pain, dislocation, aseptic loosening, and implant breakage. Minimally invasive THA and computer-navigated surgery were introduced several years ago. We have developed a novel, computer-assisted operation method for THA following the concept of "femur first"/"combined anteversion", which incorporates various aspects of performing a functional optimization of the cup position, and comprehensively addresses range of motion (ROM) as well as cup containment and alignment parameters. Hence, the purpose of this study is to assess whether the artificial joint's ROM can be improved by this computer-assisted operation method. Second, the clinical and radiological outcome will be evaluated.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>A registered patient- and observer-blinded randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients between the ages of 50 and 75 admitted for primary unilateral THA will be included. Patients will be randomly allocated to either receive minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA or the conventional minimally invasive THA procedure. Self-reported functional status and health-related quality of life (questionnaires) will be assessed both preoperatively and postoperatively. Perioperative complications will be registered. Radiographic evaluation will take place up to 6 weeks postoperatively with a computed tomography (CT) scan. Component position will be evaluated by an independent external institute on a 3D reconstruction of the femur/pelvis using image-processing software. Postoperative ROM will be calculated by an algorithm which automatically determines bony and prosthetic impingements.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>In the past, computer navigation has improved the accuracy of component positioning. So far, there are only few objective data quantifying the risks and benefits of computer navigated THA. Therefore, this study has been designed to compare minimally invasive computer-navigated "femur first" THA with a conventional technique for minimally invasive THA. The results of this trial will be presented as soon as they become available.</p> <p>Trial registration number</p> <p>DRKS00000739</p

The Effect of Robotic Technology on Perioperative Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Introduction Robotic technology has recently regained momentum in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but the effects of this technology on accuracy of implant positioning, intraoperative soft tissue injury and postoperative functional rehabilitation remain unknown. The objectives of this research thesis were to compare a comprehensive range of radiological objectives and perioperative outcomes in conventional jig-based TKA versus robotic-arm assisted TKA, and use optical motion capture technology to quantify the effects of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) resection on knee biomechanics. Methods A series of prospective cohort studies were undertaken in patients with established knee osteoarthritis undergoing primary conventional jig-based TKA versus robotic-arm assisted TKA. Predefined radiological and perioperative study outcomes were recorded by independent observers. Optical motion capture technology during robotic TKA was used to quantify the effects of ACL and PCL resection on knee biomechanics. Results Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with improved accuracy of implant positioning, reduced periarticular soft tissue injury, decreased bone trauma, improved postoperative functional rehabilitation, and reduced early systemic inflammatory response compared to conventional jig-based TKA. The Macroscopic Soft Tissue Injury (MASTI) classification system was developed and validated for grading intraoperative periarticular soft tissue injury and bone trauma during TKA. ACL resection created flexion-extension mismatch by increasing the extension gap more than the flexion gap, whilst PCL resection increased the flexion gap proportionally more than the extension gap and created mediolateral laxity in knee flexion but not in extension. Conclusion Robotic-arm assisted TKA was associated with increased accuracy of implant positioning, reduced iatrogenic soft tissue injury, and improved functional rehabilitation compared to conventional jig-based TKA. ACL and PCL resections created unique changes in knee biomechanics that affected flexion-extension gaps and mediolateral soft tissue tension during TKA. On the basis of this thesis, further clinical trials have been established to determine the long-term clinical significance of these findings

Recent trends, technical concepts and components of computer-assisted orthopedic surgery systems: A comprehensive review

Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (CAOS) systems have become one of the most important and challenging types of system in clinical orthopedics, as they enable precise treatment of musculoskeletal diseases, employing modern clinical navigation systems and surgical tools. This paper brings a comprehensive review of recent trends and possibilities of CAOS systems. There are three types of the surgical planning systems, including: systems based on the volumetric images (computer tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasound images), further systems utilize either 2D or 3D fluoroscopic images, and the last one utilizes the kinetic information about the joints and morphological information about the target bones. This complex review is focused on three fundamental aspects of CAOS systems: their essential components, types of CAOS systems, and mechanical tools used in CAOS systems. In this review, we also outline the possibilities for using ultrasound computer-assisted orthopedic surgery (UCAOS) systems as an alternative to conventionally used CAOS systems.Web of Science1923art. no. 519

Can custom 3D printed implants successfully reconstruct massive acetabular defects? A 3D-CT assessment

We report on the accuracy, measured with three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) postoperatively, in positioning custom 3D printed titanium components in patients with large acetabular defects. Twenty patients (13 females and 7 males) received custom-made acetabular implants between 2016 and 2018; the mean age was 66 years (SD = 11.6) and their mean body mass index was 28 (SD = 6.1). The median time to follow up was 25.5 months, range: 12 to 40 months. We describe a comparison method that uses the 3D models of CT-generated preoperative plans and the postoperative CT scans to quantify the discrepancy between planned and achieved component positions. Our primary outcome measures were the 3D-CT-measured difference between planned and achieved a component position in six degrees of freedom: center of rotation (CoR), component rotation, inclination (INC), and version (VER) of the cup. Our secondary outcome measures were: Oxford hip score, walking status, and complication rate. All components (100%) were positioned within 10 mm of planned CoR (in the three planes). Eighteen (95%) components were not rotated by more than 10° compared to the plan. Eleven (58%) components were positioned within 5° of planned cup angle (INC and VER). To date one complication has occurred, a periprosthetic fracture. This is the largest study in which postoperative 3D-CT measurements and clinical outcomes of custom-made acetabular components have been assessed. Accurate pre-op planning and the adoption of custom 3D printed implants show promising results in complex hip revision surgery