A framework for analyzing RFID distance bounding protocols

Many distance bounding protocols appropriate for the RFID technology have been proposed recently. Unfortunately, they are commonly designed without any formal approach, which leads to inaccurate analyzes and unfair comparisons. Motivated by this need, we introduce a unied framework that aims to improve analysis and design of distance bounding protocols. Our framework includes a thorough terminology about the frauds, adversary, and prover, thus disambiguating many misleading terms. It also explores the adversary's capabilities and strategies, and addresses the impact of the prover's ability to tamper with his device. It thus introduces some new concepts in the distance bounding domain as the black-box and white-box models, and the relation between the frauds with respect to these models. The relevancy and impact of the framework is nally demonstrated on a study case: Munilla-Peinado distance bounding protocol

Systematizing Genome Privacy Research: A Privacy-Enhancing Technologies Perspective

Rapid advances in human genomics are enabling researchers to gain a better understanding of the role of the genome in our health and well-being, stimulating hope for more effective and cost efficient healthcare. However, this also prompts a number of security and privacy concerns stemming from the distinctive characteristics of genomic data. To address them, a new research community has emerged and produced a large number of publications and initiatives. In this paper, we rely on a structured methodology to contextualize and provide a critical analysis of the current knowledge on privacy-enhancing technologies used for testing, storing, and sharing genomic data, using a representative sample of the work published in the past decade. We identify and discuss limitations, technical challenges, and issues faced by the community, focusing in particular on those that are inherently tied to the nature of the problem and are harder for the community alone to address. Finally, we report on the importance and difficulty of the identified challenges based on an online survey of genome data privacy expertsComment: To appear in the Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), Vol. 2019, Issue

Security of distance-bounding: A survey

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI linkDistance-bounding protocols allow a verifier to both authenticate a prover and evaluate whether the latter is located in his vicinity. These protocols are of particular interest in contactless systems, e.g., electronic payment or access control systems, which are vulnerable to distance-based frauds. This survey analyzes and compares in a unified manner many existing distance-bounding protocols with respect to several key security and complexity features

Computational and symbolic analysis of distance-bounding protocols

Contactless technologies are gaining more popularity everyday. Credit cards enabled with contactless payment, smart cards for transport ticketing, NFC-enabled mobile phones, and e-passports are just a few examples of contactless devices we are familiar with nowadays. Most secure systems meant for these devices presume physical proximity between the device and the reader terminal, due to their short communication range. In theory, a credit card should not be charged of an on-site purchase if the card is not up to a few centimeters away from the payment terminal. In practice, this is not always true. Indeed, some contactless payment protocols, such as Visa's payWave, have been shown vulnerable to relay attacks. In a relay attack, a man-in-the-middle uses one or more relay devices in order to make two distant devices believe they are close. Relay attacks have been implemented also to bypass keyless entry and start systems in various modern cars. Relay attacks can be defended against with distance-bounding protocols, which are security protocols that measure the round-trip times of a series of challenge/response rounds in order to guarantee physical proximity. A large number of these protocols have been proposed and more sophisticated attacks against them have been discovered. Thus, frameworks for systematic security analysis of these protocols have become of high interest. As traditional security models, distance-bounding security models sit within the two classical approaches: the computational and the symbolic models. In this thesis we propose frameworks for security analysis of distance-bounding protocols, within the two aforementioned models. First, we develop an automata-based computational framework that allows us to generically analyze a large class of distance-bounding protocols. Not only does the proposed framework allow us to straightforwardly deliver computational (in)security proofs but it also permits us to study problems such as optimal trade-offs between security and space complexity. Indeed, we solve this problem for a prominent class of protocols, and propose a protocol solution that is optimally secure amongst space-constrained protocols within the considered class. Second, by building up on an existing symbolic framework, we develop a causality-based characterization of distance-bounding security. This constitutes the first symbolic property that guarantees physical proximity without modeling continuous time or physical location. We extend further our formalism in order to capture a non-standard attack known as terrorist fraud. By using our definitions and the verification tool Tamarin, we conduct a security survey of over 25 protocols, which include industrial protocols based on the ISO/IEC 14443 standard such as NXP's MIFARE Plus with proximity check and Mastercard's PayPass payment protocol. For the industrial protocols we find attacks, propose fixes and deliver security proofs of the repaired versions

Design and Verification of Specialised Security Goals for Protocol Families

Communication Protocols form a fundamental backbone of our modern information networks. These protocols provide a framework to describe how agents - Computers, Smartphones, RFID Tags and more - should structure their communication. As a result, the security of these protocols is implicitly trusted to protect our personal data. In 1997, Lowe presented ‘A Hierarchy of Authentication Specifications’, formalising a set of security requirements that might be expected of communication protocols. The value of these requirements is that they can be formally tested and verified against a protocol specification. This allows a user to have confidence that their communications are protected in ways that are uniformly defined and universally agreed upon. Since that time, the range of objectives and applications of real-world protocols has grown. Novel requirements - such as checking the physical distance between participants, or evolving trust assumptions of intermediate nodes on the network - mean that new attack vectors are found on a frequent basis. The challenge, then, is to define security goals which will guarantee security, even when the nature of these attacks is not known. In this thesis, a methodology for the design of security goals is created. It is used to define a collection of specialised security goals for protocols in multiple different families, by considering tailor-made models for these specific scenarios. For complex requirements, theorems are proved that simplify analysis, allowing the verification of security goals to be efficiently modelled in automated prover tools

A Novel RFID Distance Bounding Protocol Based on Physically Unclonable Functions

The file attached to this record is the author's final peer reviewed version. The Publisher's final version can be found by following the DOI link.Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) systems are vulnerable to relay attacks (i.e., mafia, terrorist and distance frauds) when they are used for authentication purposes. Distance bounding protocols are particularly designed as a countermeasure against these attacks. These protocols aim to ensure that the tags are in a distant area by measuring the round-trip delays during a rapid challenge-response exchange of short authenticated messages. Terrorist fraud is the most challenging attack to avoid, because a legitimate user (a tag owner) collaborates with an attacker to defeat the authentication system. Many RFID distance bounding protocols have been proposed recently, with encouraging results. However, none of them provides the ideal security against the terrorist fraud. Motivated by this need, we first introduce a strong adversary model for Physically Unclonable Functions (PUFs) based authentication protocol in which the adversary has access to volatile memory of the tag. We show that the security of Sadeghi et al.’s PUF based authentication protocol is not secure in this model. We provide a new technique to improve the security of their protocol. Namely, in our scheme, even if an adversary has access to volatile memory she cannot obtain all long term keys to clone the tag. Next, we propose a novel RFID distance bounding protocol based on PUFs which satisfies the expected security requirements. Comparing to the previous protocols, the use of PUFs in our protocol enhances the system in terms of security, privacy and tag computational overhead. We also prove that our extended protocol with a final signature provides the ideal security against all those frauds, remarkably the terrorist fraud. Besides that, our protocols enjoy the attractive properties of PUFs, which provide the most cost efficient and reliable means to fingerprint chips based on their physical properties