3,377 research outputs found
Minimum Convex Partitions and Maximum Empty Polytopes
Let be a set of points in . A Steiner convex partition
is a tiling of with empty convex bodies. For every integer ,
we show that admits a Steiner convex partition with at most tiles. This bound is the best possible for points in general
position in the plane, and it is best possible apart from constant factors in
every fixed dimension . We also give the first constant-factor
approximation algorithm for computing a minimum Steiner convex partition of a
planar point set in general position. Establishing a tight lower bound for the
maximum volume of a tile in a Steiner convex partition of any points in the
unit cube is equivalent to a famous problem of Danzer and Rogers. It is
conjectured that the volume of the largest tile is .
Here we give a -approximation algorithm for computing the
maximum volume of an empty convex body amidst given points in the
-dimensional unit box .Comment: 16 pages, 4 figures; revised write-up with some running times
improve
The cross covariogram of a pair of polygons determines both polygons, with a few exceptions
The cross covariogram g_{K,L} of two convex sets K and L in R^n is the
function which associates to each x in R^n the volume of the intersection of K
and L+x.
Very recently Averkov and Bianchi [AB] have confirmed Matheron's conjecture
on the covariogram problem, that asserts that any planar convex body K is
determined by the knowledge of g_{K,K}.
The problem of determining the sets from their covariogram is relevant in
probability, in statistical shape recognition and in the determination of the
atomic structure of a quasicrystal from X-ray diffraction images.
We prove that when K and L are convex polygons (and also when K and L are
planar convex cones) g_{K,L} determines both K and L, up to a described family
of exceptions. These results imply that, when K and L are in these classes, the
information provided by the cross covariogram is so rich as to determine not
only one unknown body, as required by Matheron's conjecture, but two bodies,
with a few classified exceptions.
These results are also used by Bianchi [Bia] to prove that any convex
polytope P in R^3 is determined by g_{P,P}.Comment: 26 pages, 9 figure
On -Gons and -Holes in Point Sets
We consider a variation of the classical Erd\H{o}s-Szekeres problems on the
existence and number of convex -gons and -holes (empty -gons) in a set
of points in the plane. Allowing the -gons to be non-convex, we show
bounds and structural results on maximizing and minimizing their numbers. Most
noteworthy, for any and sufficiently large , we give a quadratic lower
bound for the number of -holes, and show that this number is maximized by
sets in convex position
On -Guarding Thin Orthogonal Polygons
Guarding a polygon with few guards is an old and well-studied problem in
computational geometry. Here we consider the following variant: We assume that
the polygon is orthogonal and thin in some sense, and we consider a point
to guard a point if and only if the minimum axis-aligned rectangle spanned
by and is inside the polygon. A simple proof shows that this problem is
NP-hard on orthogonal polygons with holes, even if the polygon is thin. If
there are no holes, then a thin polygon becomes a tree polygon in the sense
that the so-called dual graph of the polygon is a tree. It was known that
finding the minimum set of -guards is polynomial for tree polygons, but the
run-time was . We show here that with a different approach
the running time becomes linear, answering a question posed by Biedl et al.
(SoCG 2011). Furthermore, the approach is much more general, allowing to
specify subsets of points to guard and guards to use, and it generalizes to
polygons with holes or thickness , becoming fixed-parameter tractable in
.Comment: 18 page
- …