245 research outputs found
Partial Weighted MaxSAT for Optimal Planning
Abstract. We consider the problem of computing optimal plans for proposi-tional planning problems with action costs. In the spirit of leveraging advances in general-purpose automated reasoning for that setting, we develop an approach that operates by solving a sequence of partial weighted MaxSAT problems, each of which corresponds to a step-bounded variant of the problem at hand. Our ap-proach is the first SAT-based system in which a proof of cost-optimality is ob-tained using a MaxSAT procedure. It is also the first system of this kind to incor-porate an admissible planning heuristic. We perform a detailed empirical eval-uation of our work using benchmarks from a number of International Planning Competitions.
Partial Weighted MaxSAT for Optimal Planning
We consider the problem of computing optimal plans for propositional planning problems with action costs. In the spirit of leveraging advances in general-purpose automated reasoning for that setting, we develop an approach that operates by solving a sequence of partial weighted MaxSAT problems, each of which corresponds to a step-bounded variant of the problem at hand. Our approach is the first SAT-based system in which a proof of cost-optimality is obtained using a MaxSAT procedure. It is also the first system of this kind to incorporate an admissible planning heuristic. We perform a detailed empirical evaluation of our work using benchmarks from a number of International Planning Competitions.NICTA is funded by the Australian Government as represented by the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy
and the Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence program.
This work was also supported by EC FP7-IST grant 215181-CogX
On Different Strategies for Eliminating Redundant Actions from Plans
Satisficing planning engines are often able to generate plans in a reasonable time, however, plans are often far from optimal. Such plans often contain a high number of redundant actions, that are actions, which can be removed without affecting the validity of the plans. Existing approaches for determining and eliminating redundant actions work in polynomial time, however, do not guarantee eliminating the "best" set of redundant actions, since such a problem is NP-complete. We introduce an approach which encodes the problem of determining the "best" set of redundant actions (i.e. having the maximum total-cost) as a weighted MaxSAT problem. Moreover, we adapt the existing polynomial technique which greedily tries to eliminate an action and its dependants from the plan in order to eliminate more expensive redundant actions. The proposed approaches are empirically compared to existing approaches on plans generated by state-of-the-art planning engines on standard planning benchmark
Solving Linux Upgradeability Problems Using Boolean Optimization
Managing the software complexity of package-based systems can be regarded as
one of the main challenges in software architectures. Upgrades are required on
a short time basis and systems are expected to be reliable and consistent after
that. For each package in the system, a set of dependencies and a set of
conflicts have to be taken into account. Although this problem is
computationally hard to solve, efficient tools are required. In the best
scenario, the solutions provided should also be optimal in order to better
fulfill users requirements and expectations. This paper describes two different
tools, both based on Boolean satisfiability (SAT), for solving Linux
upgradeability problems. The problem instances used in the evaluation of these
tools were mainly obtained from real environments, and are subject to two
different lexicographic optimization criteria. The developed tools can provide
optimal solutions for many of the instances, but a few challenges remain.
Moreover, it is our understanding that this problem has many similarities with
other configuration problems, and therefore the same techniques can be used in
other domains.Comment: In Proceedings LoCoCo 2010, arXiv:1007.083
Low-rank semidefinite programming for the MAX2SAT problem
This paper proposes a new algorithm for solving MAX2SAT problems based on
combining search methods with semidefinite programming approaches. Semidefinite
programming techniques are well-known as a theoretical tool for approximating
maximum satisfiability problems, but their application has traditionally been
very limited by their speed and randomized nature. Our approach overcomes this
difficult by using a recent approach to low-rank semidefinite programming,
specialized to work in an incremental fashion suitable for use in an exact
search algorithm. The method can be used both within complete or incomplete
solver, and we demonstrate on a variety of problems from recent competitions.
Our experiments show that the approach is faster (sometimes by orders of
magnitude) than existing state-of-the-art complete and incomplete solvers,
representing a substantial advance in search methods specialized for MAX2SAT
problems.Comment: Accepted at AAAI'19. The code can be found at
https://github.com/locuslab/mixsa
On Optimization Modulo Theories, MaxSMT and Sorting Networks
Optimization Modulo Theories (OMT) is an extension of SMT which allows for
finding models that optimize given objectives. (Partial weighted) MaxSMT --or
equivalently OMT with Pseudo-Boolean objective functions, OMT+PB-- is a
very-relevant strict subcase of OMT. We classify existing approaches for MaxSMT
or OMT+PB in two groups: MaxSAT-based approaches exploit the efficiency of
state-of-the-art MAXSAT solvers, but they are specific-purpose and not always
applicable; OMT-based approaches are general-purpose, but they suffer from
intrinsic inefficiencies on MaxSMT/OMT+PB problems.
We identify a major source of such inefficiencies, and we address it by
enhancing OMT by means of bidirectional sorting networks. We implemented this
idea on top of the OptiMathSAT OMT solver. We run an extensive empirical
evaluation on a variety of problems, comparing MaxSAT-based and OMT-based
techniques, with and without sorting networks, implemented on top of
OptiMathSAT and {\nu}Z. The results support the effectiveness of this idea, and
provide interesting insights about the different approaches.Comment: 17 pages, submitted at Tacas 1
Incremental Cardinality Constraints for MaxSAT
Maximum Satisfiability (MaxSAT) is an optimization variant of the Boolean
Satisfiability (SAT) problem. In general, MaxSAT algorithms perform a
succession of SAT solver calls to reach an optimum solution making extensive
use of cardinality constraints. Many of these algorithms are non-incremental in
nature, i.e. at each iteration the formula is rebuilt and no knowledge is
reused from one iteration to another. In this paper, we exploit the knowledge
acquired across iterations using novel schemes to use cardinality constraints
in an incremental fashion. We integrate these schemes with several MaxSAT
algorithms. Our experimental results show a significant performance boost for
these algo- rithms as compared to their non-incremental counterparts. These
results suggest that incremental cardinality constraints could be beneficial
for other constraint solving domains.Comment: 18 pages, 4 figures, 1 table. Final version published in Principles
and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP) 201
- …