329 research outputs found
Self-Adaptive Surrogate-Assisted Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy
This paper presents a novel mechanism to adapt surrogate-assisted
population-based algorithms. This mechanism is applied to ACM-ES, a recently
proposed surrogate-assisted variant of CMA-ES. The resulting algorithm,
saACM-ES, adjusts online the lifelength of the current surrogate model (the
number of CMA-ES generations before learning a new surrogate) and the surrogate
hyper-parameters. Both heuristics significantly improve the quality of the
surrogate model, yielding a significant speed-up of saACM-ES compared to the
ACM-ES and CMA-ES baselines. The empirical validation of saACM-ES on the
BBOB-2012 noiseless testbed demonstrates the efficiency and the scalability
w.r.t the problem dimension and the population size of the proposed approach,
that reaches new best results on some of the benchmark problems.Comment: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2012) (2012
A hybrid swarm-based algorithm for single-objective optimization problems involving high-cost analyses
In many technical fields, single-objective optimization procedures in
continuous domains involve expensive numerical simulations. In this context, an
improvement of the Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) algorithm, called the Artificial
super-Bee enhanced Colony (AsBeC), is presented. AsBeC is designed to provide
fast convergence speed, high solution accuracy and robust performance over a
wide range of problems. It implements enhancements of the ABC structure and
hybridizations with interpolation strategies. The latter are inspired by the
quadratic trust region approach for local investigation and by an efficient
global optimizer for separable problems. Each modification and their combined
effects are studied with appropriate metrics on a numerical benchmark, which is
also used for comparing AsBeC with some effective ABC variants and other
derivative-free algorithms. In addition, the presented algorithm is validated
on two recent benchmarks adopted for competitions in international conferences.
Results show remarkable competitiveness and robustness for AsBeC.Comment: 19 pages, 4 figures, Springer Swarm Intelligenc
Alternative Restart Strategies for CMA-ES
This paper focuses on the restart strategy of CMA-ES on multi-modal
functions. A first alternative strategy proceeds by decreasing the initial
step-size of the mutation while doubling the population size at each restart. A
second strategy adaptively allocates the computational budget among the restart
settings in the BIPOP scheme. Both restart strategies are validated on the BBOB
benchmark; their generality is also demonstrated on an independent real-world
problem suite related to spacecraft trajectory optimization
Maximum Likelihood-based Online Adaptation of Hyper-parameters in CMA-ES
The Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy (CMA-ES) is widely
accepted as a robust derivative-free continuous optimization algorithm for
non-linear and non-convex optimization problems. CMA-ES is well known to be
almost parameterless, meaning that only one hyper-parameter, the population
size, is proposed to be tuned by the user. In this paper, we propose a
principled approach called self-CMA-ES to achieve the online adaptation of
CMA-ES hyper-parameters in order to improve its overall performance.
Experimental results show that for larger-than-default population size, the
default settings of hyper-parameters of CMA-ES are far from being optimal, and
that self-CMA-ES allows for dynamically approaching optimal settings.Comment: 13th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature
(PPSN 2014) (2014
Sequential vs. Integrated Algorithm Selection and Configuration: A Case Study for the Modular CMA-ES
When faced with a specific optimization problem, choosing which algorithm to
use is always a tough task. Not only is there a vast variety of algorithms to
select from, but these algorithms often are controlled by many hyperparameters,
which need to be tuned in order to achieve the best performance possible.
Usually, this problem is separated into two parts: algorithm selection and
algorithm configuration. With the significant advances made in Machine
Learning, however, these problems can be integrated into a combined algorithm
selection and hyperparameter optimization task, commonly known as the CASH
problem. In this work we compare sequential and integrated algorithm selection
and configuration approaches for the case of selecting and tuning the best out
of 4608 variants of the Covariance Matrix Adaptation Evolution Strategy
(CMA-ES) tested on the Black Box Optimization Benchmark (BBOB) suite. We first
show that the ranking of the modular CMA-ES variants depends to a large extent
on the quality of the hyperparameters. This implies that even a sequential
approach based on complete enumeration of the algorithm space will likely
result in sub-optimal solutions. In fact, we show that the integrated approach
manages to provide competitive results at a much smaller computational cost. We
also compare two different mixed-integer algorithm configuration techniques,
called irace and Mixed-Integer Parallel Efficient Global Optimization
(MIP-EGO). While we show that the two methods differ significantly in their
treatment of the exploration-exploitation balance, their overall performances
are very similar
A Computationally Efficient Limited Memory CMA-ES for Large Scale Optimization
We propose a computationally efficient limited memory Covariance Matrix
Adaptation Evolution Strategy for large scale optimization, which we call the
LM-CMA-ES. The LM-CMA-ES is a stochastic, derivative-free algorithm for
numerical optimization of non-linear, non-convex optimization problems in
continuous domain. Inspired by the limited memory BFGS method of Liu and
Nocedal (1989), the LM-CMA-ES samples candidate solutions according to a
covariance matrix reproduced from direction vectors selected during the
optimization process. The decomposition of the covariance matrix into Cholesky
factors allows to reduce the time and memory complexity of the sampling to
, where is the number of decision variables. When is large
(e.g., > 1000), even relatively small values of (e.g., ) are
sufficient to efficiently solve fully non-separable problems and to reduce the
overall run-time.Comment: Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO'2014) (2014
Quantifying the Impact of Parameter Tuning on Nature-Inspired Algorithms
The problem of parameterization is often central to the effective deployment
of nature-inspired algorithms. However, finding the optimal set of parameter
values for a combination of problem instance and solution method is highly
challenging, and few concrete guidelines exist on how and when such tuning may
be performed. Previous work tends to either focus on a specific algorithm or
use benchmark problems, and both of these restrictions limit the applicability
of any findings. Here, we examine a number of different algorithms, and study
them in a "problem agnostic" fashion (i.e., one that is not tied to specific
instances) by considering their performance on fitness landscapes with varying
characteristics. Using this approach, we make a number of observations on which
algorithms may (or may not) benefit from tuning, and in which specific
circumstances.Comment: 8 pages, 7 figures. Accepted at the European Conference on Artificial
Life (ECAL) 2013, Taormina, Ital
- …