2,841 research outputs found
Algebraic foundations for qualitative calculi and networks
A qualitative representation is like an ordinary representation of a
relation algebra, but instead of requiring , as
we do for ordinary representations, we only require that , for each in the algebra. A constraint
network is qualitatively satisfiable if its nodes can be mapped to elements of
a qualitative representation, preserving the constraints. If a constraint
network is satisfiable then it is clearly qualitatively satisfiable, but the
converse can fail. However, for a wide range of relation algebras including the
point algebra, the Allen Interval Algebra, RCC8 and many others, a network is
satisfiable if and only if it is qualitatively satisfiable.
Unlike ordinary composition, the weak composition arising from qualitative
representations need not be associative, so we can generalise by considering
network satisfaction problems over non-associative algebras. We prove that
computationally, qualitative representations have many advantages over ordinary
representations: whereas many finite relation algebras have only infinite
representations, every finite qualitatively representable algebra has a finite
qualitative representation; the representability problem for (the atom
structures of) finite non-associative algebras is NP-complete; the network
satisfaction problem over a finite qualitatively representable algebra is
always in NP; the validity of equations over qualitative representations is
co-NP-complete. On the other hand we prove that there is no finite
axiomatisation of the class of qualitatively representable algebras.Comment: 22 page
Constraint Network Satisfaction for Finite Relation Algebras
Network satisfaction problems (NSPs) for finite relation algebras are computational decision problems, studied intensively since the 1990s. The major open research challenge in this field is to understand which of these problems are solvable by polynomial-time algorithms. Since there are known examples of undecidable NSPs of finite relation algebras it is advisable to restrict the scope of such a classification attempt to well-behaved subclasses of relation algebras. The class of relation algebras with a normal representation is such a well-behaved subclass. Many well-known examples of relation algebras, such as the Point Algebra, RCC5, and Allen’s Interval Algebra admit a normal representation. The great advantage of finite relation algebras with normal representations is that their NSP is essentially the same as a constraint satisfaction problem (CSP). For a relational structure B the problem CSP(B) is the computational problem to decide whether a given finite relational structure C has a homomorphism to B. The study of CSPs has a long and rich history, culminating for the time being in the celebrated proofs of the Feder-Vardi dichotomy conjecture. Bulatov and Zhuk independently proved that for every finite structure B the problem CSP(B) is in P or NP-complete. Both proofs rely on the universal-algebraic approach, a powerful theory that connects algebraic properties of structures B with complexity results for the decision problems CSP(B).
Our contributions to the field are divided into three parts. Firstly, we provide two algebraic criteria for NP-hardness of NSPs. Our second result is a complete classification of the complexity of NSPs for symmetric relation algebras with a flexible atom; these problems are in P or NP-complete. Our result is obtained via a decidable condition on the relation algebra which implies polynomial-time tractability of the NSP. As a third contribution we prove that for a large class of NSPs, non-hardness implies that the problems can even be solved by Datalog programs, unless P = NP. This result can be used to strengthen the dichotomy result for NSPs of symmetric relation algebras with a flexible atom: every such problem can be solved by a Datalog program or is NP-complete. Our proof relies equally on known results and new observations in the algebraic analysis of finite structures.
The CSPs that emerge from NSPs are typically of the form CSP(B) for an infinite structure B and therefore do not fall into the scope of the dichotomy result for finite structures. In this thesis we study NSPs of finite relation algebras with normal representations by the universal algebraic methods which were developed for the study of finite and infinite-domain CSPs. We additionally make use of model theory and a Ramsey-type result of Nešetril and Rödl.
Our contributions to the field are divided into three parts. Firstly, we provide two algebraic criteria for NP-hardness of NSPs. Our second result is a complete classification of the complexity of NSPs for symmetric relation algebras with a flexible atom; these problems are in P or NP-complete. Our result is obtained via a decidable condition on the relation algebra which implies polynomial-time tractability of the NSP. As a third contribution we prove that for a large class of NSPs the containment in P implies that the problems can even be solved by Datalog programs, unless P = NP. As a third contribution we prove that for a large class of NSPs, non-hardness implies that the problems can even be solved by Datalog programs, unless P = NP. This result can be used to strengthen the dichotomy result for NSPs of symmetric relation algebras with a flexible atom: every such problem can be solved by a Datalog program or is NP-complete. Our proof relies equally on known results and new observations in the algebraic analysis of finite structures
A Dichotomy Theorem for the Inverse Satisfiability Problem
The inverse satisfiability problem over a set of Boolean relations Gamma (Inv-SAT(Gamma)) is the computational decision problem of, given a set of models R, deciding whether there exists a SAT(Gamma) instance with R as its set of models. This problem is co-NP-complete in general and a dichotomy theorem for finite ? containing the constant Boolean relations was obtained by Kavvadias and Sideri. In this paper we remove the latter condition and prove that Inv-SAT(Gamma) is always either tractable or co-NP-complete for all finite sets of relations Gamma, thus solving a problem open since 1998. Very little of the techniques used by Kavvadias and Sideri are applicable and we have to turn to more recently developed algebraic approaches based on partial polymorphisms. We also consider the case when ? is infinite, where the situation differs markedly from the case of SAT. More precisely, we show that there exists infinite Gamma such that Inv-SAT(Gamma) is tractable even though there exists finite Delta is subset of Gamma such that Inv-SAT(Delta) is co-NP-complete
Efficient enumeration of solutions produced by closure operations
In this paper we address the problem of generating all elements obtained by
the saturation of an initial set by some operations. More precisely, we prove
that we can generate the closure of a boolean relation (a set of boolean
vectors) by polymorphisms with a polynomial delay. Therefore we can compute
with polynomial delay the closure of a family of sets by any set of "set
operations": union, intersection, symmetric difference, subsets, supersets
). To do so, we study the problem: for a set
of operations , decide whether an element belongs to the closure
by of a family of elements. In the boolean case, we prove that
is in P for any set of boolean operations
. When the input vectors are over a domain larger than two
elements, we prove that the generic enumeration method fails, since
is NP-hard for some . We also study the
problem of generating minimal or maximal elements of closures and prove that
some of them are related to well known enumeration problems such as the
enumeration of the circuits of a matroid or the enumeration of maximal
independent sets of a hypergraph. This article improves on previous works of
the same authors.Comment: 30 pages, 1 figure. Long version of the article arXiv:1509.05623 of
the same name which appeared in STACS 2016. Final version for DMTCS journa
- …