Asymptotic Consensus Without Self-Confidence

This paper studies asymptotic consensus in systems in which agents do not necessarily have self-confidence, i.e., may disregard their own value during execution of the update rule. We show that the prevalent hypothesis of self-confidence in many convergence results can be replaced by the existence of aperiodic cores. These are stable aperiodic subgraphs, which allow to virtually store information about an agent's value distributedly in the network. Our results are applicable to systems with message delays and memory loss.Comment: 13 page

Approximate Consensus in Highly Dynamic Networks: The Role of Averaging Algorithms

In this paper, we investigate the approximate consensus problem in highly dynamic networks in which topology may change continually and unpredictably. We prove that in both synchronous and partially synchronous systems, approximate consensus is solvable if and only if the communication graph in each round has a rooted spanning tree, i.e., there is a coordinator at each time. The striking point in this result is that the coordinator is not required to be unique and can change arbitrarily from round to round. Interestingly, the class of averaging algorithms, which are memoryless and require no process identifiers, entirely captures the solvability issue of approximate consensus in that the problem is solvable if and only if it can be solved using any averaging algorithm. Concerning the time complexity of averaging algorithms, we show that approximate consensus can be achieved with precision of $\varepsilon$ in a coordinated network model in $O(n^{n+1} \log\frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ synchronous rounds, and in $O(\Delta n^{n\Delta+1} \log\frac{1}{\varepsilon})$ rounds when the maximum round delay for a message to be delivered is $\Delta$. While in general, an upper bound on the time complexity of averaging algorithms has to be exponential, we investigate various network models in which this exponential bound in the number of nodes reduces to a polynomial bound. We apply our results to networked systems with a fixed topology and classical benign fault models, and deduce both known and new results for approximate consensus in these systems. In particular, we show that for solving approximate consensus, a complete network can tolerate up to 2n-3 arbitrarily located link faults at every round, in contrast with the impossibility result established by Santoro and Widmayer (STACS '89) showing that exact consensus is not solvable with n-1 link faults per round originating from the same node

How to decide consensus? A combinatorial necessary and sufficient condition and a proof that consensus is decidable but NP-hard

A set of stochastic matrices ${\cal P}$ is a consensus set if for every sequence of matrices $P(1), P(2), \ldots$ whose elements belong to ${\cal P}$ and every initial state $x(0)$, the sequence of states defined by $x(t) = P(t) P(t-1) \cdots P(1) x(0)$ converges to a vector whose entries are all identical. In this paper, we introduce an "avoiding set condition" for compact sets of matrices and prove in our main theorem that this explicit combinatorial condition is both necessary and sufficient for consensus. We show that several of the conditions for consensus proposed in the literature can be directly derived from the avoiding set condition. The avoiding set condition is easy to check with an elementary algorithm, and so our result also establishes that consensus is algorithmically decidable. Direct verification of the avoiding set condition may require more than a polynomial time number of operations. This is however likely to be the case for any consensus checking algorithm since we also prove in this paper that unless $P=NP$, consensus cannot be decided in polynomial time