Next generation of growth-sparing techniques: preliminary clinical results of a magnetically controlled growing rod in 14 patients

Session 3A - Early Onset Scoliosis: Paper no. 33SUMMARY: Growth-sparing techniques are commonly used for the treatment of progressive EOS. The standard growing rod (GR) technique requires multiple surgeries for lengthening. The preliminary results of MCGR has shown the comparable outcomes to standard GR without the need for repeated surgery which can be expected to reduce the overall complication rate in GR surgery. INTRODUCTION: The growing rod (GR) technique for management of progressive Early-Onset Scoliosis (EOS) is a viable alternative but with a high complication rate attributed to frequent surgical lengthenings. The safety and efficacy of a non-invasive Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) has been previously reported in a porcine model. We are reporting the preliminary results of this technique in EOS. METHODS: Retrospective review of prospectively collected multi-center data. Only patients who underwent MCGR surgery and at least 3 subsequent spinal distractions were included in this preliminary review. Distractions were performed in clinic without anesthesia or analgesics. T1-T12 and T1-S1 height and the distraction distance inside the actuator were analyzed in addition to conventional clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: Patients (N=14; 7 F and 7 M) had a mean age of 8y+10m (3y+6m to 12y+7m) and underwent a total of 14 index surgeries (SR: index single rod in 5 and DR: dual rod in 9) and 91 distractions. There were 5 idiopathic, 4 neuromuscular, 2 congenital, 2 syndromic and one NF. Mean follow-up (FU) was 10 months (5.8-18.2). Mean Cobb changed from 57° pre-op to 35° post-op and correction was maintained (35°) at latest FU. T1-T12 increased by 4 mm for SR and 10 mm for DR with mean monthly gain of 0.5 and 1.39, respectively. T1-S1 gain was 4 mm for SR and 17 mm for DR with mean monthly gain of 0.5 mm for SR and 2.35 mm for DR. The mean interval between index surgery and the first distraction was 66 days and thereafter was 43 days. Complications included one superficial infection in (SR), one prominent implant (DR) and minimal loss of initial distraction in three after index MCGR (all SR). Overall, partial loss of distraction was observed following 14 of the 91 distractions (one DR and 13 SR). This loss was regained in subsequent distractions. There was no neurologic deficit or implant failure. CONCLUSION: MCGR appears to be safe and provided adequate distraction similar to the standard GR technique without the need for repeated surgeries. DR patients had better initial curve correction and greater spinal height. No major complications were observed during the short follow-up period. The FDA has not cleared the drug and/or medical device for the use described in this presentation (i.e., the drug or medical device is being discussed for an ‘off label’ use).postprin

Analysis of the backpack loading efects on the human gait

Gait is a simple activity of daily life and one of the main abilities of the human being. Often during leisure, labour and sports activities, loads are carried over (e.g. backpack) during gait. These circumstantial loads can generate instability and increase biomechanicalstress over the human tissues and systems, especially on the locomotor, balance and postural regulation systems. According to Wearing (2006), subjects that carry a transitory or intermittent load will be able to find relatively efficient solutions to compensate its effects.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

Digital Workflows and Material Sciences in Dental Medicine

The trend of digitalization is an omnipresent phenomenon nowadays – in social life and in the dental community. Advancement in digital technology has fostered research into new dental materials for the use of these workflows, particularly in the field of prosthodontics and oral implantology.CAD/CAM-technology has been the game changer for the production of tooth-borne and implant-supported (monolithic) reconstructions: from optical scanning, to on-screen designing, and rapid prototyping using milling or 3D-printing. In this context, the continuous development and speedy progress in digital workflows and dental materials ensure new opportunities in dentistry.The objective of this Special Issue is to provide an update on the current knowledge with state-of-the-art theory and practical information on digital workflows to determine the uptake of technological innovations in dental materials science. In addition, emphasis is placed on identifying future research needs to manage the continuous increase in digitalization in combination with dental materials and to accomplish their clinical translation.This Special Issue welcomes all types of studies and reviews considering the perspectives of the various stakeholders with regard to digital dentistry and dental materials