Universal Communication, Universal Graphs, and Graph Labeling

We introduce a communication model called universal SMP, in which Alice and Bob receive a function f belonging to a family ?, and inputs x and y. Alice and Bob use shared randomness to send a message to a third party who cannot see f, x, y, or the shared randomness, and must decide f(x,y). Our main application of universal SMP is to relate communication complexity to graph labeling, where the goal is to give a short label to each vertex in a graph, so that adjacency or other functions of two vertices x and y can be determined from the labels ?(x), ?(y). We give a universal SMP protocol using O(k^2) bits of communication for deciding whether two vertices have distance at most k in distributive lattices (generalizing the k-Hamming Distance problem in communication complexity), and explain how this implies a O(k^2 log n) labeling scheme for deciding dist(x,y) ? k on distributive lattices with size n; in contrast, we show that a universal SMP protocol for determining dist(x,y) ? 2 in modular lattices (a superset of distributive lattices) has super-constant ?(n^{1/4}) communication cost. On the other hand, we demonstrate that many graph families known to have efficient adjacency labeling schemes, such as trees, low-arboricity graphs, and planar graphs, admit constant-cost communication protocols for adjacency. Trees also have an O(k) protocol for deciding dist(x,y) ? k and planar graphs have an O(1) protocol for dist(x,y) ? 2, which implies a new O(log n) labeling scheme for the same problem on planar graphs

Near-Optimal Induced Universal Graphs for Bounded Degree Graphs

A graph $U$ is an induced universal graph for a family $F$ of graphs if every graph in $F$ is a vertex-induced subgraph of $U$. For the family of all undirected graphs on $n$ vertices Alstrup, Kaplan, Thorup, and Zwick [STOC 2015] give an induced universal graph with $O\!\left(2^{n/2}\right)$ vertices, matching a lower bound by Moon [Proc. Glasgow Math. Assoc. 1965]. Let $k= \lceil D/2 \rceil$. Improving asymptotically on previous results by Butler [Graphs and Combinatorics 2009] and Esperet, Arnaud and Ochem [IPL 2008], we give an induced universal graph with $O\!\left(\frac{k2^k}{k!}n^k \right)$ vertices for the family of graphs with $n$ vertices of maximum degree $D$. For constant $D$, Butler gives a lower bound of $\Omega\!\left(n^{D/2}\right)$. For an odd constant $D\geq 3$, Esperet et al. and Alon and Capalbo [SODA 2008] give a graph with $O\!\left(n^{k-\frac{1}{D}}\right)$ vertices. Using their techniques for any (including constant) even values of $D$ gives asymptotically worse bounds than we present. For large $D$, i.e. when $D = \Omega\left(\log^3 n\right)$, the previous best upper bound was ${n\choose\lceil D/2\rceil} n^{O(1)}$ due to Adjiashvili and Rotbart [ICALP 2014]. We give upper and lower bounds showing that the size is ${\lfloor n/2\rfloor\choose\lfloor D/2 \rfloor}2^{\pm\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{D}\right)}$. Hence the optimal size is $2^{\tilde{O}(D)}$ and our construction is within a factor of $2^{\tilde{O}\left(\sqrt{D}\right)}$ from this. The previous results were larger by at least a factor of $2^{\Omega(D)}$. As a part of the above, proving a conjecture by Esperet et al., we construct an induced universal graph with $2n-1$ vertices for the family of graphs with max degree $2$. In addition, we give results for acyclic graphs with max degree $2$ and cycle graphs. Our results imply the first labeling schemes that for any $D$ are at most $o(n)$ bits from optimal

Sparser Johnson-Lindenstrauss Transforms

We give two different and simple constructions for dimensionality reduction in $\ell_2$ via linear mappings that are sparse: only an $O(\varepsilon)$-fraction of entries in each column of our embedding matrices are non-zero to achieve distortion $1+\varepsilon$ with high probability, while still achieving the asymptotically optimal number of rows. These are the first constructions to provide subconstant sparsity for all values of parameters, improving upon previous works of Achlioptas (JCSS 2003) and Dasgupta, Kumar, and Sarl\'{o}s (STOC 2010). Such distributions can be used to speed up applications where $\ell_2$ dimensionality reduction is used.Comment: v6: journal version, minor changes, added Remark 23; v5: modified abstract, fixed typos, added open problem section; v4: simplified section 4 by giving 1 analysis that covers both constructions; v3: proof of Theorem 25 in v2 was written incorrectly, now fixed; v2: Added another construction achieving same upper bound, and added proof of near-tight lower bound for DKS schem