2,016 research outputs found
Average-case Approximation Ratio of Scheduling without Payments
Apart from the principles and methodologies inherited from Economics and Game
Theory, the studies in Algorithmic Mechanism Design typically employ the
worst-case analysis and approximation schemes of Theoretical Computer Science.
For instance, the approximation ratio, which is the canonical measure of
evaluating how well an incentive-compatible mechanism approximately optimizes
the objective, is defined in the worst-case sense. It compares the performance
of the optimal mechanism against the performance of a truthful mechanism, for
all possible inputs.
In this paper, we take the average-case analysis approach, and tackle one of
the primary motivating problems in Algorithmic Mechanism Design -- the
scheduling problem [Nisan and Ronen 1999]. One version of this problem which
includes a verification component is studied by [Koutsoupias 2014]. It was
shown that the problem has a tight approximation ratio bound of (n+1)/2 for the
single-task setting, where n is the number of machines. We show, however, when
the costs of the machines to executing the task follow any independent and
identical distribution, the average-case approximation ratio of the mechanism
given in [Koutsoupias 2014] is upper bounded by a constant. This positive
result asymptotically separates the average-case ratio from the worst-case
ratio, and indicates that the optimal mechanism for the problem actually works
well on average, although in the worst-case the expected cost of the mechanism
is Theta(n) times that of the optimal cost
Bribeproof mechanisms for two-values domains
Schummer (Journal of Economic Theory 2000) introduced the concept of
bribeproof mechanism which, in a context where monetary transfer between agents
is possible, requires that manipulations through bribes are ruled out.
Unfortunately, in many domains, the only bribeproof mechanisms are the trivial
ones which return a fixed outcome.
This work presents one of the few constructions of non-trivial bribeproof
mechanisms for these quasi-linear environments. Though the suggested
construction applies to rather restricted domains, the results obtained are
tight: For several natural problems, the method yields the only possible
bribeproof mechanism and no such mechanism is possible on more general domains.Comment: Extended abstract accepted to SAGT 2016. This ArXiv version corrects
typos in the proofs of Theorem 7 and Claims 28-29 of prior ArXiv versio
Collusion in Peer-to-Peer Systems
Peer-to-peer systems have reached a widespread use, ranging from academic and industrial applications to home entertainment. The key advantage of this paradigm lies in its scalability and flexibility, consequences of the participants sharing their resources for the common welfare. Security in such systems is a desirable goal. For example, when mission-critical operations or bank transactions are involved, their effectiveness strongly depends on the perception that users have about the system dependability and trustworthiness. A major threat to the security of these systems is the phenomenon of collusion. Peers can be selfish colluders, when they try to fool the system to gain unfair advantages over other peers, or malicious, when their purpose is to subvert the system or disturb other users. The problem, however, has received so far only a marginal attention by the research community. While several solutions exist to counter attacks in peer-to-peer systems, very few of them are meant to directly counter colluders and their attacks. Reputation, micro-payments, and concepts of game theory are currently used as the main means to obtain fairness in the usage of the resources. Our goal is to provide an overview of the topic by examining the key issues involved. We measure the relevance of the problem in the current literature and the effectiveness of existing philosophies against it, to suggest fruitful directions in the further development of the field
Security and Privacy Issues in Wireless Mesh Networks: A Survey
This book chapter identifies various security threats in wireless mesh
network (WMN). Keeping in mind the critical requirement of security and user
privacy in WMNs, this chapter provides a comprehensive overview of various
possible attacks on different layers of the communication protocol stack for
WMNs and their corresponding defense mechanisms. First, it identifies the
security vulnerabilities in the physical, link, network, transport, application
layers. Furthermore, various possible attacks on the key management protocols,
user authentication and access control protocols, and user privacy preservation
protocols are presented. After enumerating various possible attacks, the
chapter provides a detailed discussion on various existing security mechanisms
and protocols to defend against and wherever possible prevent the possible
attacks. Comparative analyses are also presented on the security schemes with
regards to the cryptographic schemes used, key management strategies deployed,
use of any trusted third party, computation and communication overhead involved
etc. The chapter then presents a brief discussion on various trust management
approaches for WMNs since trust and reputation-based schemes are increasingly
becoming popular for enforcing security in wireless networks. A number of open
problems in security and privacy issues for WMNs are subsequently discussed
before the chapter is finally concluded.Comment: 62 pages, 12 figures, 6 tables. This chapter is an extension of the
author's previous submission in arXiv submission: arXiv:1102.1226. There are
some text overlaps with the previous submissio
Betrayal, Distrust, and Rationality: Smart Counter-Collusion Contracts for Verifiable Cloud Computing
Cloud computing has become an irreversible trend. Together comes the pressing
need for verifiability, to assure the client the correctness of computation
outsourced to the cloud. Existing verifiable computation techniques all have a
high overhead, thus if being deployed in the clouds, would render cloud
computing more expensive than the on-premises counterpart. To achieve
verifiability at a reasonable cost, we leverage game theory and propose a smart
contract based solution. In a nutshell, a client lets two clouds compute the
same task, and uses smart contracts to stimulate tension, betrayal and distrust
between the clouds, so that rational clouds will not collude and cheat. In the
absence of collusion, verification of correctness can be done easily by
crosschecking the results from the two clouds. We provide a formal analysis of
the games induced by the contracts, and prove that the contracts will be
effective under certain reasonable assumptions. By resorting to game theory and
smart contracts, we are able to avoid heavy cryptographic protocols. The client
only needs to pay two clouds to compute in the clear, and a small transaction
fee to use the smart contracts. We also conducted a feasibility study that
involves implementing the contracts in Solidity and running them on the
official Ethereum network.Comment: Published in ACM CCS 2017, this is the full version with all
appendice
- …