1,714 research outputs found

    A survey of localization in wireless sensor network

    Get PDF
    Localization is one of the key techniques in wireless sensor network. The location estimation methods can be classified into target/source localization and node self-localization. In target localization, we mainly introduce the energy-based method. Then we investigate the node self-localization methods. Since the widespread adoption of the wireless sensor network, the localization methods are different in various applications. And there are several challenges in some special scenarios. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of these challenges: localization in non-line-of-sight, node selection criteria for localization in energy-constrained network, scheduling the sensor node to optimize the tradeoff between localization performance and energy consumption, cooperative node localization, and localization algorithm in heterogeneous network. Finally, we introduce the evaluation criteria for localization in wireless sensor network

    RFID Localisation For Internet Of Things Smart Homes: A Survey

    Full text link
    The Internet of Things (IoT) enables numerous business opportunities in fields as diverse as e-health, smart cities, smart homes, among many others. The IoT incorporates multiple long-range, short-range, and personal area wireless networks and technologies into the designs of IoT applications. Localisation in indoor positioning systems plays an important role in the IoT. Location Based IoT applications range from tracking objects and people in real-time, assets management, agriculture, assisted monitoring technologies for healthcare, and smart homes, to name a few. Radio Frequency based systems for indoor positioning such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) is a key enabler technology for the IoT due to its costeffective, high readability rates, automatic identification and, importantly, its energy efficiency characteristic. This paper reviews the state-of-the-art RFID technologies in IoT Smart Homes applications. It presents several comparable studies of RFID based projects in smart homes and discusses the applications, techniques, algorithms, and challenges of adopting RFID technologies in IoT smart home systems.Comment: 18 pages, 2 figures, 3 table

    RF Localization in Indoor Environment

    Get PDF
    In this paper indoor localization system based on the RF power measurements of the Received Signal Strength (RSS) in WLAN environment is presented. Today, the most viable solution for localization is the RSS fingerprinting based approach, where in order to establish a relationship between RSS values and location, different machine learning approaches are used. The advantage of this approach based on WLAN technology is that it does not need new infrastructure (it reuses already and widely deployed equipment), and the RSS measurement is part of the normal operating mode of wireless equipment. We derive the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound (CRLB) of localization accuracy for RSS measurements. In analysis of the bound we give insight in localization performance and deployment issues of a localization system, which could help designing an efficient localization system. To compare different machine learning approaches we developed a localization system based on an artificial neural network, k-nearest neighbors, probabilistic method based on the Gaussian kernel and the histogram method. We tested the developed system in real world WLAN indoor environment, where realistic RSS measurements were collected. Experimental comparison of the results has been investigated and average location estimation error of around 2 meters was obtained

    Group-In: Group Inference from Wireless Traces of Mobile Devices

    Full text link
    This paper proposes Group-In, a wireless scanning system to detect static or mobile people groups in indoor or outdoor environments. Group-In collects only wireless traces from the Bluetooth-enabled mobile devices for group inference. The key problem addressed in this work is to detect not only static groups but also moving groups with a multi-phased approach based only noisy wireless Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSIs) observed by multiple wireless scanners without localization support. We propose new centralized and decentralized schemes to process the sparse and noisy wireless data, and leverage graph-based clustering techniques for group detection from short-term and long-term aspects. Group-In provides two outcomes: 1) group detection in short time intervals such as two minutes and 2) long-term linkages such as a month. To verify the performance, we conduct two experimental studies. One consists of 27 controlled scenarios in the lab environments. The other is a real-world scenario where we place Bluetooth scanners in an office environment, and employees carry beacons for more than one month. Both the controlled and real-world experiments result in high accuracy group detection in short time intervals and sampling liberties in terms of the Jaccard index and pairwise similarity coefficient.Comment: This work has been funded by the EU Horizon 2020 Programme under Grant Agreements No. 731993 AUTOPILOT and No.871249 LOCUS projects. The content of this paper does not reflect the official opinion of the EU. Responsibility for the information and views expressed therein lies entirely with the authors. Proc. of ACM/IEEE IPSN'20, 202

    Thirty Years of Machine Learning: The Road to Pareto-Optimal Wireless Networks

    Full text link
    Future wireless networks have a substantial potential in terms of supporting a broad range of complex compelling applications both in military and civilian fields, where the users are able to enjoy high-rate, low-latency, low-cost and reliable information services. Achieving this ambitious goal requires new radio techniques for adaptive learning and intelligent decision making because of the complex heterogeneous nature of the network structures and wireless services. Machine learning (ML) algorithms have great success in supporting big data analytics, efficient parameter estimation and interactive decision making. Hence, in this article, we review the thirty-year history of ML by elaborating on supervised learning, unsupervised learning, reinforcement learning and deep learning. Furthermore, we investigate their employment in the compelling applications of wireless networks, including heterogeneous networks (HetNets), cognitive radios (CR), Internet of things (IoT), machine to machine networks (M2M), and so on. This article aims for assisting the readers in clarifying the motivation and methodology of the various ML algorithms, so as to invoke them for hitherto unexplored services as well as scenarios of future wireless networks.Comment: 46 pages, 22 fig

    ์‚ฌ๋ฌผ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฌด์„  ์‹ค๋‚ด ์ธก์œ„ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ) -- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ •๋ณด๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2022.2. ๊น€์„ฑ์ฒ .์‹ค๋‚ด ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋Š” ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์•ˆ๋‚ด, ์Šค๋งˆํŠธ ๊ณต์žฅ์—์„œ์˜ ์ž์› ๊ด€๋ฆฌ, ์‹ค๋‚ด ๋กœ๋ด‡์˜ ์ž์œจ์ฃผํ–‰ ๋“ฑ ๋งŽ์€ ๋ถ„์•ผ์— ์ ‘๋ชฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฌ๋ฌผ์ธํ„ฐ๋„ท ์‘์šฉ์—๋„ ํ•„์ˆ˜์ ์ธ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์œ„์น˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์„œ๋น„์Šค๋ฅผ ๊ตฌํ˜„ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•ด์„œ๋Š” ์ •ํ™•ํ•œ ์œ„์น˜ ์ •๋ณด๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ • ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์ด ํ•ต์‹ฌ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ์•ผ์™ธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ„์„ฑํ•ญ๋ฒ•์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด์„œ ์œ„์น˜ ์ •๋ณด๋ฅผ ํš๋“ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์œ„ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ „ํŒŒ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์„ธ๊ธฐ ๋ฐ ๋„๋‹ฌ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์ •๋ฐ€ํ•œ ์‹ค๋‚ด ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„ธ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๋‹ค๋ฃฌ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ €, ๋น„๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ์˜ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ • ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œ์ผœ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์œ„์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ํ•˜์ด๋ธŒ๋ฆฌ๋“œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•˜ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€๋“€์–ผ ๋ฐด๋“œ ๋Œ€์—ญ์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์„ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์‡„๋Ÿ‰์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ธก์œ„ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ, ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ •๋ถ€ ๋‹จ๊ณ„๋งŒ์„ ๋ฐ์ดํ„ฐ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ํ•™์Šต์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊นŠ์€ ์‹ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ํšŒ๊ท€ ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ ๋Œ€์ฒดํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์ด๋‹ค. ์ ์ ˆํžˆ ํ•™์Šต๋œ ๊นŠ์€ ํšŒ๊ท€ ๋ชจ๋ธ์˜ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๋น„๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์‹ค๋‚ด ๊ด‘์„ ์ถ”์  ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๋ชจ์˜์‹คํ—˜์œผ๋กœ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ๊ธฐ์กด ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด์„œ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ค‘๊ฐ„๊ฐ’์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ 22.3% ์ด์ƒ ์ค„์ผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์€ ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ AP ์œ„์น˜๋ณ€ํ™” ๋“ฑ์— ๊ฐ•์ธํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœ, ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์—์„œ ๋‹จ์ผ ๋Œ€์—ญ ์ˆ˜์‹ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์„ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ธก์ •ํ–ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๋น„๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์€ ์‹ค๋‚ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋†’์ด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ผ ๋Œ€์—ญ ์ˆ˜์‹ ์‹ ํ˜ธ์„ธ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์€ ๊ธฐ์กด์— ์ด์šฉ๋˜๋Š” ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด, ๋ธ”๋ฃจํˆฌ์Šค, ์ง๋น„ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜์‹œ์„ค์— ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ ์šฉ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋„๋ฆฌ ์ด์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์„ธ๊ธฐ์˜ ๋‹จ์ผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์†์‹ค ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ •์€ ์ƒ๋‹นํ•œ ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์ง€๋…€์„œ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ์›์ธ์€ ๋‹จ์ผ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์†์‹ค ๋ชจ๋ธ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ์ „ํŒŒ ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐ˜์˜ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์–ด๋ ต๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค๋‚ด ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ •์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ, ์ค‘์ฒฉ๋œ ๋‹ค์ค‘ ์ƒํƒœ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๊ฐ์‡„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ƒˆ๋กญ๊ฒŒ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ชจ๋ธ์€ ๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ ๋ฐ ๋น„๊ฐ€์‹œ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์—์„œ์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ํŠน์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ์ž ์žฌ์ ์ธ ํ›„๋ณด ์ƒํƒœ๋“ค์„ ์ง€๋‹Œ๋‹ค. ํ•œ ์ˆœ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ˆ˜์‹  ์‹ ํ˜ธ ์„ธ๊ธฐ ์ธก์ •์น˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ค€ ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ๋ณ„๋กœ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์†์‹ค ๋ชจ๋ธ ์ƒํƒœ๋ฅผ ๊ฒฐ์ •ํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ์œจ์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ ์œ„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ๋ณ„ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ์†์‹ค๋ชจ๋ธ ์ƒํƒœ์˜ ์กฐํ•ฉ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ธก์œ„ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•  ์ง€ํ‘œ๋กœ์„œ ๋น„์šฉํ•จ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ •์˜ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ฐ ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ๋ณ„ ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ฑ„๋„ ๋ชจ๋ธ์„ ์ฐพ๋Š”๋ฐ ํ•„์š”ํ•œ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ ๋ณต์žก๋„๋Š” ๊ธฐ์ง€๊ตญ ์ˆ˜์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ธฐํ•˜๊ธ‰์ˆ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ, ์œ ์ „ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ํƒ์ƒ‰์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณ„์‚ฐ๋Ÿ‰์„ ์–ต์ œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹ค๋‚ด ๊ด‘์„ ์ถ”์  ๋ชจ์˜์‹คํ—˜์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ๊ณผ ์‹ค์ธก ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ๊ฒ€์ฆ์„ ์ง„ํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์€ ์‹ค์ œ ์‹ค๋‚ด ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๊ธฐ๋ฒ•๋“ค์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์ • ์˜ค์ฐจ๋ฅผ ์•ฝ 31% ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํ‰๊ท ์ ์œผ๋กœ 1.92 m ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ๋‹ฌ์„ฑํ•จ์„ ํ™•์ธํ–ˆ๋‹ค. ๋งˆ์ง€๋ง‰์œผ๋กœ FTM ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•œ ์‹ค๋‚ด ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์  ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์Šค๋งˆํŠธํฐ์˜ ๋‚ด์žฅ ๊ด€์„ฑ ์„ผ์„œ์™€ ์™€์ดํŒŒ์ด ํ†ต์‹ ์—์„œ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” FTM ํ”„๋กœํ† ์ฝœ์„ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์ถ”์ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ํ•˜์ง€๋งŒ ์‹ค๋‚ด์˜ ๋ณต์žกํ•œ ๋‹ค์ค‘๊ฒฝ๋กœ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•œ ํ”ผํฌ ๊ฒ€์ถœ ์‹คํŒจ๋Š” ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ธก์ •์น˜์— ํŽธํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๋””๋ฐ”์ด์Šค์˜ ์ข…๋ฅ˜์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์˜ˆ์ƒ์น˜ ๋ชปํ•œ ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์˜ค์ฐจ๊ฐ€ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ํ™˜๊ฒฝ์—์„œ FTM ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ถ”์ •์„ ์ด์šฉํ•  ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์˜ค์ฐจ๋“ค์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์•ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•ด ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ™•์žฅ ์นผ๋งŒ ํ•„ํ„ฐ์™€ ๊ฒฐํ•ฉํ•˜์—ฌ FTM ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์ „ํ•„ํ„ฐ๋ง ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ด์ƒ๊ฐ’์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ , ๊ฑฐ๋ฆฌ ์ธก์ •์น˜์˜ ํŽธํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ์ œ๊ฑฐํ•˜์—ฌ ์œ„์น˜ ์ถ”์  ์ •ํ™•๋„๋ฅผ ํ–ฅ์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค. ์‹ค๋‚ด์—์„œ์˜ ์‹คํ—˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜์€ ๊ฑฐ์น˜ ์ธก์ •์น˜์˜ ํŽธํ–ฅ์„ฑ์„ ์•ฝ 44-65% ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œ์ผฐ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ตœ์ข…์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ์ž์˜ ์œ„์น˜๋ฅผ ์„œ๋ธŒ๋ฏธํ„ฐ๊ธ‰์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”์ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ–ˆ๋‹ค.Indoor location-based services (LBS) can be combined with various applications such as indoor navigation for smartphone users, resource management in smart factories, and autonomous driving of robots. It is also indispensable for Internet of Things (IoT) applications. For various LBS, accurate location information is essential. Therefore, a proper ranging and positioning algorithm is important. For outdoors, the global navigation satellite system (GNSS) is available to provide position information. However, the GNSS is inappropriate indoors owing to the issue of the blocking of the signals from satellites. It is necessary to develop a technology that can replace GNSS in GNSS-denied environments. Among the various alternative systems, the one of promising technology is to use a Wi-Fi system that has already been applied to many commercial devices, and the infrastructure is in place in many regions. In this dissertation, Wi-Fi based indoor localization methods are presented. In the specific, I propose the three major issues related to accurate indoor localization using received signal strength (RSS) and fine timing measurement (FTM) protocol in the 802.11 standard for my dissertation topics. First, I propose a hybrid localization algorithm to boost the accuracy of range-based localization by improving the ranging accuracy under indoor non-line-of-sight (NLOS) conditions. I replaced the ranging part of the rule-based localization method with a deep regression model that uses data-driven learning with dual-band received signal strength (RSS). The ranging error caused by the NLOS conditions was effectively reduced by using the deep regression method. As a consequence, the positioning error could be reduced under NLOS conditions. The performance of the proposed method was verified through a ray-tracing-based simulation for indoor spaces. The proposed scheme showed a reduction in the positioning error of at least 22.3% in terms of the median root mean square error. Next, I study on positioning algorithm that considering NLOS conditions for each APs, using single band RSS measurement. The single band RSS information is widely used for indoor localization because they can be easily implemented by using existing infrastructure like Wi-Fi, Blutooth, or Zigbee. However, range estimation with a single pathloss model produces considerable errors, which degrade the positioning performance. This problem mainly arises because the single pathloss model cannot reflect diverse indoor radio wave propagation characteristics. In this study, I develop a new overlapping multi-state model to consider multiple candidates of pathloss models including line-of-sight (LOS) and NLOS states, and propose an efficient way to select a proper model for each reference node involved in the localization process. To this end, I formulate a cost function whose value varies widely depending on the choice of pathloss model of each access point. Because the computational complexity to find an optimal channel model for each reference node exponentially increases with the number of reference nodes, I apply a genetic algorithm to significantly reduce the complexity so that the proposed method can be executed in real-time. Experimental validations with ray-tracing simulations and RSS measurements at a real site confirm the improvement of localization accuracy for Wi-Fi in indoor environments. The proposed method achieves up to 1.92~m mean positioning error under a practical indoor environment and produces a performance improvement of 31.09\% over the benchmark scenario. Finally, I investigate accurate indoor tracking algorithm using FTM protocol in this dissertation. By using the FTM ranging and the built-in sensors in a smartphone, it is possible to track the user's location in indoor. However, the failure of first peak detection due to the multipath effect causes a bias in the FTM ranging results in the practical indoor environment. Additionally, the unexpected ranging error dependent on device type also degrades the indoor positioning accuracy. In this study, I considered the factors of ranging error in the FTM protocol in practical indoor environment, and proposed a method to compensate ranging error. I designed an EKF-based tracking algorithm that adaptively removes outliers from the FTM result and corrects bias to increase positioning accuracy. The experimental results verified that the proposed algorithm reduces the average ofthe ranging bias by 43-65\% in an indoor scenarios, and can achieve the sub-meter accuracy in average route mean squared error of user's position in the experiment scenarios.Abstract i Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii 1 INTRODUCTION 1 2 Hybrid Approach for Indoor Localization Using Received Signal Strength of Dual-BandWi-Fi 6 2.1 Motivation 6 2.2 Preliminary 8 2.3 System model 11 2.4 Proposed Ranging Method 13 2.5 Performance Evaluation 16 2.5.1 Ray-Tracing-Based Simulation 16 2.5.2 Analysis of the Ranging Accuracy 21 2.5.3 Analysis of the Neural Network Structure 25 2.5.4 Analysis of Positioning Accuracy 26 2.6 Summary 29 3 Genetic Algorithm for Path Loss Model Selection in Signal Strength Based Indoor Localization 31 3.1 Motivation 31 3.2 Preliminary 34 3.2.1 RSS-based Ranging Techniques 35 3.2.2 Positioning Technique 37 3.3 Proposed localization method 38 3.3.1 Localization Algorithm with Overlapped Multi-State Path Loss Model 38 3.3.2 Localization with Genetic Algorithm-Based Search 41 3.4 Performance evaluation 46 3.4.1 Numerical simulation 50 3.4.2 Experimental results 56 3.5 Summary 60 4 Indoor User Tracking with Self-calibrating Range Bias Using FTM Protocol 62 4.1 Motivation 62 4.2 Preliminary 63 4.2.1 FTM ranging 63 4.2.2 PDR-based trajectory estimation 65 4.3 EKF design for adaptive compensation of ranging bias 66 4.4 Performance evaluation 69 4.4.1 Experimental scenario 69 4.4.2 Experimental results 70 4.5 Summary 75 5 Conclusion 76 Abstract (In Korean) 89๋ฐ•

    RSS-based wireless LAN indoor localization and tracking using deep architectures

    Get PDF
    Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) positioning is a challenging task indoors due to environmental constraints and the unpredictable behavior of signal propagation, even at a fixed location. The aim of this work is to develop deep learning-based approaches for indoor localization and tracking by utilizing Received Signal Strength (RSS). The study proposes Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), One and Two Dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks (1D CNN and 2D CNN), and Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) deep networks architectures for WLAN indoor positioning based on the data obtained by actual RSS measurements from an existing WLAN infrastructure in a mobile user scenario. The results, using different types of deep architectures including MLP, CNNs, and LSTMs with existing WLAN algorithms, are presented. The Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is used as the assessment criterion. The proposed LSTM Model 2 achieved a dynamic positioning RMSE error of 1.73 m, which outperforms probabilistic WLAN algorithms such as Memoryless Positioning (RMSE: 10.35 m) and Nonparametric Information (NI) filter with variable acceleration (RMSE: 5.2 m) under the same experiment environment.ECSEL Joint Undertaking ; European Union's H2020 Framework Programme (H2020/2014-2020) Grant ; National Authority TUBITA
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore