25,022 research outputs found
A Utility-Theoretic Approach to Privacy in Online Services
Online offerings such as web search, news portals, and e-commerce applications face the challenge of providing high-quality service to a large, heterogeneous user base. Recent efforts have highlighted the potential to improve performance by introducing methods to personalize services based on special knowledge about users and their context. For example, a user's demographics, location, and past search and browsing may be useful in enhancing the results offered in response to web search queries. However, reasonable concerns about privacy by both users, providers, and government agencies acting on behalf of citizens, may limit access by services to such information. We introduce and explore an economics of privacy in personalization, where people can opt to share personal information, in a standing or on-demand manner, in return for expected enhancements in the quality of an online service. We focus on the example of web search and formulate realistic objective functions for search efficacy and privacy. We demonstrate how we can find a provably near-optimal optimization of the utility-privacy tradeoff in an efficient manner. We evaluate our methodology on data drawn from a log of the search activity of volunteer participants. We separately assess usersā preferences about privacy and utility via a large-scale survey, aimed at eliciting preferences about peoplesā willingness to trade the sharing of personal data in returns for gains in search efficiency. We show that a significant level of personalization can be achieved using a relatively small amount of information about users
Size versus truthfulness in the House Allocation problem
We study the House Allocation problem (also known as the Assignment problem),
i.e., the problem of allocating a set of objects among a set of agents, where
each agent has ordinal preferences (possibly involving ties) over a subset of
the objects. We focus on truthful mechanisms without monetary transfers for
finding large Pareto optimal matchings. It is straightforward to show that no
deterministic truthful mechanism can approximate a maximum cardinality Pareto
optimal matching with ratio better than 2. We thus consider randomised
mechanisms. We give a natural and explicit extension of the classical Random
Serial Dictatorship Mechanism (RSDM) specifically for the House Allocation
problem where preference lists can include ties. We thus obtain a universally
truthful randomised mechanism for finding a Pareto optimal matching and show
that it achieves an approximation ratio of . The same bound
holds even when agents have priorities (weights) and our goal is to find a
maximum weight (as opposed to maximum cardinality) Pareto optimal matching. On
the other hand we give a lower bound of on the approximation
ratio of any universally truthful Pareto optimal mechanism in settings with
strict preferences. In the case that the mechanism must additionally be
non-bossy with an additional technical assumption, we show by utilising a
result of Bade that an improved lower bound of holds. This
lower bound is tight since RSDM for strict preference lists is non-bossy. We
moreover interpret our problem in terms of the classical secretary problem and
prove that our mechanism provides the best randomised strategy of the
administrator who interviews the applicants.Comment: To appear in Algorithmica (preliminary version appeared in the
Proceedings of EC 2014
Explorations in Evolutionary Design of Online Auction Market Mechanisms
This paper describes the use of a genetic algorithm (GA) to find optimal parameter-values for trading agents that operate in virtual online auction āe-marketplacesā, where the rules of those marketplaces are also under simultaneous control of the GA. The aim is to use the GA to automatically design new mechanisms for agent-based e-marketplaces that are more efficient than online markets designed by (or populated by) humans. The space of possible auction-types explored by the GA includes the Continuous Double Auction (CDA) mechanism (as used in most of the worldās financial exchanges), and also two purely one-sided mechanisms. Surprisingly, the GA did not always settle on the CDA as an optimum. Instead, novel hybrid auction mechanisms were evolved, which are unlike any existing market mechanisms. In this paper we show that, when the market supply and demand schedules undergo sudden āshockā changes partway through the evaluation process, two-sided hybrid market mechanisms can evolve which may be unlike any human-designed auction and yet may also be significantly more efficient than any human designed market mechanism
Statistical Arbitrage Mining for Display Advertising
We study and formulate arbitrage in display advertising. Real-Time Bidding
(RTB) mimics stock spot exchanges and utilises computers to algorithmically buy
display ads per impression via a real-time auction. Despite the new automation,
the ad markets are still informationally inefficient due to the heavily
fragmented marketplaces. Two display impressions with similar or identical
effectiveness (e.g., measured by conversion or click-through rates for a
targeted audience) may sell for quite different prices at different market
segments or pricing schemes. In this paper, we propose a novel data mining
paradigm called Statistical Arbitrage Mining (SAM) focusing on mining and
exploiting price discrepancies between two pricing schemes. In essence, our
SAMer is a meta-bidder that hedges advertisers' risk between CPA (cost per
action)-based campaigns and CPM (cost per mille impressions)-based ad
inventories; it statistically assesses the potential profit and cost for an
incoming CPM bid request against a portfolio of CPA campaigns based on the
estimated conversion rate, bid landscape and other statistics learned from
historical data. In SAM, (i) functional optimisation is utilised to seek for
optimal bidding to maximise the expected arbitrage net profit, and (ii) a
portfolio-based risk management solution is leveraged to reallocate bid volume
and budget across the set of campaigns to make a risk and return trade-off. We
propose to jointly optimise both components in an EM fashion with high
efficiency to help the meta-bidder successfully catch the transient statistical
arbitrage opportunities in RTB. Both the offline experiments on a real-world
large-scale dataset and online A/B tests on a commercial platform demonstrate
the effectiveness of our proposed solution in exploiting arbitrage in various
model settings and market environments.Comment: In the proceedings of the 21st ACM SIGKDD international conference on
Knowledge discovery and data mining (KDD 2015
High-speed detection of emergent market clustering via an unsupervised parallel genetic algorithm
We implement a master-slave parallel genetic algorithm (PGA) with a bespoke
log-likelihood fitness function to identify emergent clusters within price
evolutions. We use graphics processing units (GPUs) to implement a PGA and
visualise the results using disjoint minimal spanning trees (MSTs). We
demonstrate that our GPU PGA, implemented on a commercially available general
purpose GPU, is able to recover stock clusters in sub-second speed, based on a
subset of stocks in the South African market. This represents a pragmatic
choice for low-cost, scalable parallel computing and is significantly faster
than a prototype serial implementation in an optimised C-based
fourth-generation programming language, although the results are not directly
comparable due to compiler differences. Combined with fast online intraday
correlation matrix estimation from high frequency data for cluster
identification, the proposed implementation offers cost-effective,
near-real-time risk assessment for financial practitioners.Comment: 10 pages, 5 figures, 4 tables, More thorough discussion of
implementatio
An Investigation Report on Auction Mechanism Design
Auctions are markets with strict regulations governing the information
available to traders in the market and the possible actions they can take.
Since well designed auctions achieve desirable economic outcomes, they have
been widely used in solving real-world optimization problems, and in
structuring stock or futures exchanges. Auctions also provide a very valuable
testing-ground for economic theory, and they play an important role in
computer-based control systems.
Auction mechanism design aims to manipulate the rules of an auction in order
to achieve specific goals. Economists traditionally use mathematical methods,
mainly game theory, to analyze auctions and design new auction forms. However,
due to the high complexity of auctions, the mathematical models are typically
simplified to obtain results, and this makes it difficult to apply results
derived from such models to market environments in the real world. As a result,
researchers are turning to empirical approaches.
This report aims to survey the theoretical and empirical approaches to
designing auction mechanisms and trading strategies with more weights on
empirical ones, and build the foundation for further research in the field
- ā¦