12,714 research outputs found
Algebraic Theories over Nominal Sets
We investigate the foundations of a theory of algebraic data types with
variable binding inside classical universal algebra. In the first part, a
category-theoretic study of monads over the nominal sets of Gabbay and Pitts
leads us to introduce new notions of finitary based monads and uniform monads.
In a second part we spell out these notions in the language of universal
algebra, show how to recover the logics of Gabbay-Mathijssen and
Clouston-Pitts, and apply classical results from universal algebra.Comment: 16 page
Semantics out of context: nominal absolute denotations for first-order logic and computation
Call a semantics for a language with variables absolute when variables map to
fixed entities in the denotation. That is, a semantics is absolute when the
denotation of a variable a is a copy of itself in the denotation. We give a
trio of lattice-based, sets-based, and algebraic absolute semantics to
first-order logic. Possibly open predicates are directly interpreted as lattice
elements / sets / algebra elements, subject to suitable interpretations of the
connectives and quantifiers. In particular, universal quantification "forall
a.phi" is interpreted using a new notion of "fresh-finite" limit and using a
novel dual to substitution.
The interest of this semantics is partly in the non-trivial and beautiful
technical details, which also offer certain advantages over existing
semantics---but also the fact that such semantics exist at all suggests a new
way of looking at variables and the foundations of logic and computation, which
may be well-suited to the demands of modern computer science
Representation and duality of the untyped lambda-calculus in nominal lattice and topological semantics, with a proof of topological completeness
We give a semantics for the lambda-calculus based on a topological duality
theorem in nominal sets. A novel interpretation of lambda is given in terms of
adjoints, and lambda-terms are interpreted absolutely as sets (no valuation is
necessary)
The language of Stratified Sets is confluent and strongly normalising
We study the properties of the language of Stratified Sets (first-order logic
with and a stratification condition) as used in TST, TZT, and (with
stratifiability instead of stratification) in Quine's NF. We find that the
syntax forms a nominal algebra for substitution and that stratification and
stratifiability imply confluence and strong normalisation under rewrites
corresponding naturally to -conversion.Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1406.406
Finite and infinite support in nominal algebra and logic: nominal completeness theorems for free
By operations on models we show how to relate completeness with respect to
permissive-nominal models to completeness with respect to nominal models with
finite support. Models with finite support are a special case of
permissive-nominal models, so the construction hinges on generating from an
instance of the latter, some instance of the former in which sufficiently many
inequalities are preserved between elements. We do this using an infinite
generalisation of nominal atoms-abstraction.
The results are of interest in their own right, but also, we factor the
mathematics so as to maximise the chances that it could be used off-the-shelf
for other nominal reasoning systems too. Models with infinite support can be
easier to work with, so it is useful to have a semi-automatic theorem to
transfer results from classes of infinitely-supported nominal models to the
more restricted class of models with finite support.
In conclusion, we consider different permissive-nominal syntaxes and nominal
models and discuss how they relate to the results proved here
Coinduction up to in a fibrational setting
Bisimulation up-to enhances the coinductive proof method for bisimilarity,
providing efficient proof techniques for checking properties of different kinds
of systems. We prove the soundness of such techniques in a fibrational setting,
building on the seminal work of Hermida and Jacobs. This allows us to
systematically obtain up-to techniques not only for bisimilarity but for a
large class of coinductive predicates modelled as coalgebras. By tuning the
parameters of our framework, we obtain novel techniques for unary predicates
and nominal automata, a variant of the GSOS rule format for similarity, and a
new categorical treatment of weak bisimilarity
Strongly Complete Logics for Coalgebras
Coalgebras for a functor model different types of transition systems in a
uniform way. This paper focuses on a uniform account of finitary logics for
set-based coalgebras. In particular, a general construction of a logic from an
arbitrary set-functor is given and proven to be strongly complete under
additional assumptions. We proceed in three parts. Part I argues that sifted
colimit preserving functors are those functors that preserve universal
algebraic structure. Our main theorem here states that a functor preserves
sifted colimits if and only if it has a finitary presentation by operations and
equations. Moreover, the presentation of the category of algebras for the
functor is obtained compositionally from the presentations of the underlying
category and of the functor. Part II investigates algebras for a functor over
ind-completions and extends the theorem of J{\'o}nsson and Tarski on canonical
extensions of Boolean algebras with operators to this setting. Part III shows,
based on Part I, how to associate a finitary logic to any finite-sets
preserving functor T. Based on Part II we prove the logic to be strongly
complete under a reasonable condition on T
From nominal sets binding to functions and lambda-abstraction: connecting the logic of permutation models with the logic of functions
Permissive-Nominal Logic (PNL) extends first-order predicate logic with
term-formers that can bind names in their arguments. It takes a semantics in
(permissive-)nominal sets. In PNL, the forall-quantifier or lambda-binder are
just term-formers satisfying axioms, and their denotation is functions on
nominal atoms-abstraction.
Then we have higher-order logic (HOL) and its models in ordinary (i.e.
Zermelo-Fraenkel) sets; the denotation of forall or lambda is functions on full
or partial function spaces.
This raises the following question: how are these two models of binding
connected? What translation is possible between PNL and HOL, and between
nominal sets and functions?
We exhibit a translation of PNL into HOL, and from models of PNL to certain
models of HOL. It is natural, but also partial: we translate a restricted
subsystem of full PNL to HOL. The extra part which does not translate is the
symmetry properties of nominal sets with respect to permutations. To use a
little nominal jargon: we can translate names and binding, but not their
nominal equivariance properties. This seems reasonable since HOL---and ordinary
sets---are not equivariant.
Thus viewed through this translation, PNL and HOL and their models do
different things, but they enjoy non-trivial and rich subsystems which are
isomorphic
- …