100 research outputs found

    Parameterized Algorithms for Finding Large Sparse Subgraphs:Kernelization and Beyond

    Get PDF

    Minimal reducible bounds for induced-hereditary properties

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet (Ma,⊆) and (La,⊆) be the lattices of additive induced-hereditary properties of graphs and additive hereditary properties of graphs, respectively. A property R∈Ma (∈La) is called a minimal reducible bound for a property P∈Ma (∈La) if in the interval (P,R) of the lattice Ma (La) there are only irreducible properties. The set of all minimal reducible bounds of a property P∈Ma in the lattice Ma we denote by BM(P). Analogously, the set of all minimal reducible bounds of a property P∈La in La is denoted by BL(P).We establish a method to determine minimal reducible bounds for additive degenerate induced-hereditary (hereditary) properties of graphs. We show that this method can be successfully used to determine already known minimal reducible bounds for k-degenerate graphs and outerplanar graphs in the lattice La. Moreover, in terms of this method we describe the sets of minimal reducible bounds for partial k-trees and the graphs with restricted order of components in La and k-degenerate graphs in Ma

    Minimal reducible bounds for the class of k-degenerate graphs

    Get PDF
    AbstractLet (La,⊆) be the lattice of hereditary and additive properties of graphs. A reducible property R∈La is called minimal reducible bound for a property P∈La if in the interval (P,R) of the lattice La, there are only irreducible properties. We prove that the set B(Dk)={Dp∘Dq:k=p+q+1} is the covering set of minimal reducible bounds for the class Dk of all k-degenerate graphs

    On percolation and the bunkbed conjecture

    Full text link
    We study a problem on edge percolation on product graphs G×K2G\times K_2. Here GG is any finite graph and K2K_2 consists of two vertices {0,1}\{0,1\} connected by an edge. Every edge in G×K2G\times K_2 is present with probability pp independent of other edges. The Bunkbed conjecture states that for all GG and pp the probability that (u,0)(u,0) is in the same component as (v,0)(v,0) is greater than or equal to the probability that (u,0)(u,0) is in the same component as (v,1)(v,1) for every pair of vertices u,vGu,v\in G. We generalize this conjecture and formulate and prove similar statements for randomly directed graphs. The methods lead to a proof of the original conjecture for special classes of graphs GG, in particular outerplanar graphs.Comment: 13 pages, improved exposition thanks to anonymous referee. To appear in CP

    Online choosability of graphs

    Get PDF
    We study several problems in graph coloring. In list coloring, each vertex vv has a set L(v)L(v) of available colors and must be assigned a color from this set so that adjacent vertices receive distinct colors; such a coloring is an LL-coloring, and we then say that GG is LL-colorable. Given a graph GG and a function f:V(G)Nf:V(G)\to\N, we say that GG is ff-choosable if GG is LL-colorable for any list assignment LL such that L(v)f(v)|L(v)|\ge f(v) for all vV(G)v\in V(G). When f(v)=kf(v)=k for all vv and GG is ff-choosable, we say that GG is kk-choosable. The least kk such that GG is kk-choosable is the choice number, denoted ch(G)\ch(G). We focus on an online version of this problem, which is modeled by the Lister/Painter game. The game is played on a graph in which every vertex has a positive number of tokens. In each round, Lister marks a nonempty subset MM of uncolored vertices, removing one token at each marked vertex. Painter responds by selecting a subset DD of MM that forms an independent set in GG. A color distinct from those used on previous rounds is given to all vertices in DD. Lister wins by marking a vertex that has no tokens, and Painter wins by coloring all vertices in GG. When Painter has a winning strategy, we say that GG is ff-paintable. If f(v)=kf(v)=k for all vv and GG is ff-paintable, then we say that GG is kk-paintable. The least kk such that GG is kk-paintable is the paint number, denoted \pa(G). In Chapter 2, we develop useful tools for studying the Lister/Painter game. We study the paintability of graph joins and of complete bipartite graphs. In particular, \pa(K_{k,r})\le k if and only if r<kkr<k^k. In Chapter 3, we study the Lister/Painter game with the added restriction that the proper coloring produced by Painter must also satisfy some property P\mathcal{P}. The main result of Chapter 3 provides a general method to give a winning strategy for Painter when a strategy for the list coloring problem is already known. One example of a property P\mathcal{P} is that of having an rr-dynamic coloring, where a proper coloring is rr-dynamic if each vertex vv has at least min{r,d(v)}\min\set{r,d(v)} distinct colors in its neighborhood. For any graph GG and any rr, we give upper bounds on how many tokens are necessary for Painter to produce an rr-dynamic coloring of GG. The upper bounds are in terms of rr and the genus of a surface on which GG embeds. In Chapter 4, we study a version of the Lister/Painter game in which Painter must assign mm colors to each vertex so that adjacent vertices receive disjoint color sets. We characterize the graphs in which 2m2m tokens is sufficient to produce such a coloring. We strengthen Brooks' Theorem as well as Thomassen's result that planar graphs are 5-choosable. In Chapter 5, we study sum-paintability. The sum-paint number of a graph GG, denoted \spa(G), is the least f(v)\sum f(v) over all ff such that GG is ff-paintable. We prove the easy upper bound: \spa(G)\le|V(G)|+|E(G)|. When \spa(G)=|V(G)|+|E(G)|, we say that GG is sp-greedy. We determine the sum-paintability of generalized theta-graphs. The generalized theta-graph Θ1,,k\Theta_{\ell_1,\dots,\ell_k} consists of two vertices joined by kk paths of lengths \VEC \ell1k. We conjecture that outerplanar graphs are sp-greedy and prove several partial results toward this conjecture. In Chapter 6, we study what happens when Painter is allowed to allocate tokens as Lister marks vertices. The slow-coloring game is played by Lister and Painter on a graph GG. Lister marks a nonempty set of uncolored vertices and scores 1 point for each marked vertex. Painter colors all vertices in an independent subset of the marked vertices with a color distinct from those used previously in the game. The game ends when all vertices have been colored. The sum-color cost of a graph GG, denoted \scc(G), is the maximum score Lister can guarantee in the slow-coloring game on GG. We prove several general lower and upper bounds for \scc(G). In more detail, we study trees and prove sharp upper and lower bounds over all trees with nn vertices. We give a formula to determine \scc(G) exactly when α(G)2\alpha(G)\le2. Separately, we prove that \scc(G)=\spa(G) if and only if GG is a disjoint union of cliques. Lastly, we give lower and upper bounds on \scc(K_{r,s})
    corecore