4,624 research outputs found
NP-hardness of circuit minimization for multi-output functions
Can we design efficient algorithms for finding fast algorithms? This question is captured by various circuit minimization problems, and algorithms for the corresponding tasks have significant practical applications. Following the work of Cook and Levin in the early 1970s, a central question is whether minimizing the circuit size of an explicitly given function is NP-complete. While this is known to hold in restricted models such as DNFs, making progress with respect to more expressive classes of circuits has been elusive.
In this work, we establish the first NP-hardness result for circuit minimization of total functions in the setting of general (unrestricted) Boolean circuits. More precisely, we show that computing the minimum circuit size of a given multi-output Boolean function f : {0,1}^n ? {0,1}^m is NP-hard under many-one polynomial-time randomized reductions. Our argument builds on a simpler NP-hardness proof for the circuit minimization problem for (single-output) Boolean functions under an extended set of generators.
Complementing these results, we investigate the computational hardness of minimizing communication. We establish that several variants of this problem are NP-hard under deterministic reductions. In particular, unless ? = ??, no polynomial-time computable function can approximate the deterministic two-party communication complexity of a partial Boolean function up to a polynomial. This has consequences for the class of structural results that one might hope to show about the communication complexity of partial functions
Pre-Reduction Graph Products: Hardnesses of Properly Learning DFAs and Approximating EDP on DAGs
The study of graph products is a major research topic and typically concerns
the term , e.g., to show that . In this paper, we
study graph products in a non-standard form where is a
"reduction", a transformation of any graph into an instance of an intended
optimization problem. We resolve some open problems as applications.
(1) A tight -approximation hardness for the minimum
consistent deterministic finite automaton (DFA) problem, where is the
sample size. Due to Board and Pitt [Theoretical Computer Science 1992], this
implies the hardness of properly learning DFAs assuming (the
weakest possible assumption).
(2) A tight hardness for the edge-disjoint paths (EDP)
problem on directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where denotes the number of
vertices.
(3) A tight hardness of packing vertex-disjoint -cycles for large .
(4) An alternative (and perhaps simpler) proof for the hardness of properly
learning DNF, CNF and intersection of halfspaces [Alekhnovich et al., FOCS 2004
and J. Comput.Syst.Sci. 2008]
Curvature and Optimal Algorithms for Learning and Minimizing Submodular Functions
We investigate three related and important problems connected to machine
learning: approximating a submodular function everywhere, learning a submodular
function (in a PAC-like setting [53]), and constrained minimization of
submodular functions. We show that the complexity of all three problems depends
on the 'curvature' of the submodular function, and provide lower and upper
bounds that refine and improve previous results [3, 16, 18, 52]. Our proof
techniques are fairly generic. We either use a black-box transformation of the
function (for approximation and learning), or a transformation of algorithms to
use an appropriate surrogate function (for minimization). Curiously, curvature
has been known to influence approximations for submodular maximization [7, 55],
but its effect on minimization, approximation and learning has hitherto been
open. We complete this picture, and also support our theoretical claims by
empirical results.Comment: 21 pages. A shorter version appeared in Advances of NIPS-201
From Gap-ETH to FPT-Inapproximability: Clique, Dominating Set, and More
We consider questions that arise from the intersection between the areas of
polynomial-time approximation algorithms, subexponential-time algorithms, and
fixed-parameter tractable algorithms. The questions, which have been asked
several times (e.g., [Marx08, FGMS12, DF13]), are whether there is a
non-trivial FPT-approximation algorithm for the Maximum Clique (Clique) and
Minimum Dominating Set (DomSet) problems parameterized by the size of the
optimal solution. In particular, letting be the optimum and be
the size of the input, is there an algorithm that runs in
time and outputs a solution of size
, for any functions and that are independent of (for
Clique, we want )?
In this paper, we show that both Clique and DomSet admit no non-trivial
FPT-approximation algorithm, i.e., there is no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Clique and no
-FPT-approximation algorithm for DomSet, for any function
(e.g., this holds even if is the Ackermann function). In fact, our results
imply something even stronger: The best way to solve Clique and DomSet, even
approximately, is to essentially enumerate all possibilities. Our results hold
under the Gap Exponential Time Hypothesis (Gap-ETH) [Dinur16, MR16], which
states that no -time algorithm can distinguish between a satisfiable
3SAT formula and one which is not even -satisfiable for some
constant .
Besides Clique and DomSet, we also rule out non-trivial FPT-approximation for
Maximum Balanced Biclique, Maximum Subgraphs with Hereditary Properties, and
Maximum Induced Matching in bipartite graphs. Additionally, we rule out
-FPT-approximation algorithm for Densest -Subgraph although this
ratio does not yet match the trivial -approximation algorithm.Comment: 43 pages. To appear in FOCS'1
Complexity of Discrete Energy Minimization Problems
Discrete energy minimization is widely-used in computer vision and machine
learning for problems such as MAP inference in graphical models. The problem,
in general, is notoriously intractable, and finding the global optimal solution
is known to be NP-hard. However, is it possible to approximate this problem
with a reasonable ratio bound on the solution quality in polynomial time? We
show in this paper that the answer is no. Specifically, we show that general
energy minimization, even in the 2-label pairwise case, and planar energy
minimization with three or more labels are exp-APX-complete. This finding rules
out the existence of any approximation algorithm with a sub-exponential
approximation ratio in the input size for these two problems, including
constant factor approximations. Moreover, we collect and review the
computational complexity of several subclass problems and arrange them on a
complexity scale consisting of three major complexity classes -- PO, APX, and
exp-APX, corresponding to problems that are solvable, approximable, and
inapproximable in polynomial time. Problems in the first two complexity classes
can serve as alternative tractable formulations to the inapproximable ones.
This paper can help vision researchers to select an appropriate model for an
application or guide them in designing new algorithms.Comment: ECCV'16 accepte
Hardness and inapproximability results for minimum verification set and minimum path decision tree problems
Minimization of decision trees is a well studied problem. In this work, we introduce two new problems related to minimization of decision trees. The problems are called minimum verification set (MinVS) and minimum path decision tree (MinPathDT) problems. Decision tree problems ask the question "What is the unknown given object?". MinVS problem on the other hand asks the question "Is the unknown object z?", for a given object z. Hence it is not an identification, but rather a verification problem. MinPathDT problem aims to construct a decision tree where only the cost of the root-to-leaf path corresponding to a given object is minimized, whereas decision tree problems in general try to minimize the overall cost of decision trees considering all the
objects. Therefore, MinVS and MinPathDT are seemingly easier problems.
However, in this work we prove that MinVS and MinPathDT problems are both NP-complete and cannot be approximated within a factor in o(lg n) unless P = NP
Inapproximability of Combinatorial Optimization Problems
We survey results on the hardness of approximating combinatorial optimization
problems
- …