15 research outputs found

    On the existence of 0/1 polytopes with high semidefinite extension complexity

    Full text link
    In Rothvo\ss{} it was shown that there exists a 0/1 polytope (a polytope whose vertices are in \{0,1\}^{n}) such that any higher-dimensional polytope projecting to it must have 2^{\Omega(n)} facets, i.e., its linear extension complexity is exponential. The question whether there exists a 0/1 polytope with high PSD extension complexity was left open. We answer this question in the affirmative by showing that there is a 0/1 polytope such that any spectrahedron projecting to it must be the intersection of a semidefinite cone of dimension~2^{\Omega(n)} and an affine space. Our proof relies on a new technique to rescale semidefinite factorizations

    On the existence of 0/1 polytopes with high semidefinite extension complexity

    Get PDF
    In Rothvoß (Math Program 142(1–2):255–268, 2013) it was shown that there exists a 0/1 polytope (a polytope whose vertices are in {0, 1}n) such that any higher-dimensional polytope projecting to it must have 2Ω(n) facets, i.e., its linear extension complexity is exponential. The question whether there exists a 0/1 polytope with high positive semidefinite extension complexity was left open. We answer this question in the affirmative by showing that there is a 0/1 polytope such that any spectrahedron projecting to it must be the intersection of a semidefinite cone of dimension 2Ω(n) and an affine space. Our proof relies on a new technique to rescale semidefinite factorizations

    Computing approximate PSD factorizations

    Get PDF
    We give an algorithm for computing approximate PSD factorizations of nonnegative matrices. The running time of the algorithm is polynomial in the dimensions of the input matrix, but exponential in the PSD rank and the approximation error. The main ingredient is an exact factorization algorithm when the rows and columns of the factors are constrained to lie in a general polyhedron. This strictly generalizes nonnegative matrix factorizations which can be captured by letting this polyhedron to be the nonnegative orthant.Comment: 10 page

    The matching polytope does not admit fully-polynomial size relaxation schemes

    Full text link
    The groundbreaking work of Rothvo{\ss} [arxiv:1311.2369] established that every linear program expressing the matching polytope has an exponential number of inequalities (formally, the matching polytope has exponential extension complexity). We generalize this result by deriving strong bounds on the polyhedral inapproximability of the matching polytope: for fixed 0<ε<10 < \varepsilon < 1, every polyhedral (1+ε/n)(1 + \varepsilon / n)-approximation requires an exponential number of inequalities, where nn is the number of vertices. This is sharp given the well-known ρ\rho-approximation of size O((nρ/(ρ1)))O(\binom{n}{\rho/(\rho-1)}) provided by the odd-sets of size up to ρ/(ρ1)\rho/(\rho-1). Thus matching is the first problem in PP, whose natural linear encoding does not admit a fully polynomial-size relaxation scheme (the polyhedral equivalent of an FPTAS), which provides a sharp separation from the polynomial-size relaxation scheme obtained e.g., via constant-sized odd-sets mentioned above. Our approach reuses ideas from Rothvo{\ss} [arxiv:1311.2369], however the main lower bounding technique is different. While the original proof is based on the hyperplane separation bound (also called the rectangle corruption bound), we employ the information-theoretic notion of common information as introduced in Braun and Pokutta [http://eccc.hpi-web.de/report/2013/056/], which allows to analyze perturbations of slack matrices. It turns out that the high extension complexity for the matching polytope stem from the same source of hardness as for the correlation polytope: a direct sum structure.Comment: 21 pages, 3 figure

    Semidefinite descriptions of the convex hull of rotation matrices

    Full text link
    We study the convex hull of SO(n)SO(n), thought of as the set of n×nn\times n orthogonal matrices with unit determinant, from the point of view of semidefinite programming. We show that the convex hull of SO(n)SO(n) is doubly spectrahedral, i.e. both it and its polar have a description as the intersection of a cone of positive semidefinite matrices with an affine subspace. Our spectrahedral representations are explicit, and are of minimum size, in the sense that there are no smaller spectrahedral representations of these convex bodies.Comment: 29 pages, 1 figur

    Exponential Lower Bounds for Polytopes in Combinatorial Optimization

    Get PDF
    We solve a 20-year old problem posed by Yannakakis and prove that there exists no polynomial-size linear program (LP) whose associated polytope projects to the traveling salesman polytope, even if the LP is not required to be symmetric. Moreover, we prove that this holds also for the cut polytope and the stable set polytope. These results were discovered through a new connection that we make between one-way quantum communication protocols and semidefinite programming reformulations of LPs.Comment: 19 pages, 4 figures. This version of the paper will appear in the Journal of the ACM. The earlier conference version in STOC'12 had the title "Linear vs. Semidefinite Extended Formulations: Exponential Separation and Strong Lower Bounds
    corecore