246,288 research outputs found
Nominal Unification from a Higher-Order Perspective
Nominal Logic is a version of first-order logic with equality, name-binding,
renaming via name-swapping and freshness of names. Contrarily to higher-order
logic, bindable names, called atoms, and instantiable variables are considered
as distinct entities. Moreover, atoms are capturable by instantiations,
breaking a fundamental principle of lambda-calculus. Despite these differences,
nominal unification can be seen from a higher-order perspective. From this
view, we show that nominal unification can be reduced to a particular fragment
of higher-order unification problems: Higher-Order Pattern Unification. This
reduction proves that nominal unification can be decided in quadratic
deterministic time, using the linear algorithm for Higher-Order Pattern
Unification. We also prove that the translation preserves most generality of
unifiers
Goal Translation for a Hammer for Coq (Extended Abstract)
Hammers are tools that provide general purpose automation for formal proof
assistants. Despite the gaining popularity of the more advanced versions of
type theory, there are no hammers for such systems. We present an extension of
the various hammer components to type theory: (i) a translation of a
significant part of the Coq logic into the format of automated proof systems;
(ii) a proof reconstruction mechanism based on a Ben-Yelles-type algorithm
combined with limited rewriting, congruence closure and a first-order
generalization of the left rules of Dyckhoff's system LJT.Comment: In Proceedings HaTT 2016, arXiv:1606.0542
The Vampire and the FOOL
This paper presents new features recently implemented in the theorem prover
Vampire, namely support for first-order logic with a first class boolean sort
(FOOL) and polymorphic arrays. In addition to having a first class boolean
sort, FOOL also contains if-then-else and let-in expressions. We argue that
presented extensions facilitate reasoning-based program analysis, both by
increasing the expressivity of first-order reasoners and by gains in
efficiency
Learning-Assisted Automated Reasoning with Flyspeck
The considerable mathematical knowledge encoded by the Flyspeck project is
combined with external automated theorem provers (ATPs) and machine-learning
premise selection methods trained on the proofs, producing an AI system capable
of answering a wide range of mathematical queries automatically. The
performance of this architecture is evaluated in a bootstrapping scenario
emulating the development of Flyspeck from axioms to the last theorem, each
time using only the previous theorems and proofs. It is shown that 39% of the
14185 theorems could be proved in a push-button mode (without any high-level
advice and user interaction) in 30 seconds of real time on a fourteen-CPU
workstation. The necessary work involves: (i) an implementation of sound
translations of the HOL Light logic to ATP formalisms: untyped first-order,
polymorphic typed first-order, and typed higher-order, (ii) export of the
dependency information from HOL Light and ATP proofs for the machine learners,
and (iii) choice of suitable representations and methods for learning from
previous proofs, and their integration as advisors with HOL Light. This work is
described and discussed here, and an initial analysis of the body of proofs
that were found fully automatically is provided
A Foundational View on Integration Problems
The integration of reasoning and computation services across system and
language boundaries is a challenging problem of computer science. In this
paper, we use integration for the scenario where we have two systems that we
integrate by moving problems and solutions between them. While this scenario is
often approached from an engineering perspective, we take a foundational view.
Based on the generic declarative language MMT, we develop a theoretical
framework for system integration using theories and partial theory morphisms.
Because MMT permits representations of the meta-logical foundations themselves,
this includes integration across logics. We discuss safe and unsafe integration
schemes and devise a general form of safe integration
On the uniform one-dimensional fragment
The uniform one-dimensional fragment of first-order logic, U1, is a recently
introduced formalism that extends two-variable logic in a natural way to
contexts with relations of all arities. We survey properties of U1 and
investigate its relationship to description logics designed to accommodate
higher arity relations, with particular attention given to DLR_reg. We also
define a description logic version of a variant of U1 and prove a range of new
results concerning the expressivity of U1 and related logics
Mass problems and intuitionistic higher-order logic
In this paper we study a model of intuitionistic higher-order logic which we
call \emph{the Muchnik topos}. The Muchnik topos may be defined briefly as the
category of sheaves of sets over the topological space consisting of the Turing
degrees, where the Turing cones form a base for the topology. We note that our
Muchnik topos interpretation of intuitionistic mathematics is an extension of
the well known Kolmogorov/Muchnik interpretation of intuitionistic
propositional calculus via Muchnik degrees, i.e., mass problems under weak
reducibility. We introduce a new sheaf representation of the intuitionistic
real numbers, \emph{the Muchnik reals}, which are different from the Cauchy
reals and the Dedekind reals. Within the Muchnik topos we obtain a \emph{choice
principle} and a \emph{bounding principle} where range over Muchnik
reals, ranges over functions from Muchnik reals to Muchnik reals, and
is a formula not containing or . For the convenience of the
reader, we explain all of the essential background material on intuitionism,
sheaf theory, intuitionistic higher-order logic, Turing degrees, mass problems,
Muchnik degrees, and Kolmogorov's calculus of problems. We also provide an
English translation of Muchnik's 1963 paper on Muchnik degrees.Comment: 44 page
- …